Skip navigation |

Mohamed, R (on the application of) and The Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs - index for 10 February 2010

The Queen on the application of Binyam Mohamed and The Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs

10 February 2010

Judgment Index
(by paragraph number)

Lord Chief Justice of England and Wales 1 – 9

  • Terrorism 10 – 13
  • Torture 14 - 24
  • The claim for disclosure 25 - 33
  • Open Justice 34 - 42
  • Control Principle 43 - 47
  • Conclusion 48 - 58

Master of the Rolls 59

  • The factual and procedural history 60 - 73
    • The first and second certificates and events leading up to the fourth judgment
      74 - 81
    • The fourth judgment 82 - 90
    • The third certificate, the CIA letter, Mr Halperin and Secretary of State Clinton 91 - 102
    • The fifth judgment 103 - 114
    • This appeal and Judge Kessler's memorandum opinion in the US 115 - 128
    • Discussion and analysis
    • The role of the court and the executive 129 - 135
    • Summary of my conclusion on this appeal 136 - 141
    • Before Judge Kessler's Opinion: the risk to national security: the fifth judgment 142 - 153
    • Before Judge Kessler's Opinion: the risk to national security: assessment 154 - 174
    • The public interest in the redacted paragraphs being disclosed 175 - 185
    • Before Judge Kessler's Opinion: the balancing exercise 186 - 191
    • The risk to national security in the light of Judge Kessler's Opinion 192 - 203
  • Concluding remarks 204 - 207

Sir Anthony May

  • Introduction 208 - 209
  • The Divisional Court's six judgments 210 - 259
  • Satellite litigation 260 - 261
  • The issue and points of principle 262
  • Grounds of Appeal 263
  • The relevant time 264
  • The first ground of appeal 265 - 283
  • Discussion 284 - 290
  • Judge Kessler's Memorandum Opinion 291 - 296

Further information...

 

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies on the Judicial Office website. To find out more about the cookies, see our privacy policy.