Skip navigation |

A written constitution?

Speech by Lord Bingham of Cornhill, at the Judicial Studies Board Annual Lecture 2004

01/01/2004

 

Lord Bingham wondered whether, "at long last", the UK should adopt some form of fixed and written constitution.

He considered the arguments for and against such a move - including the example of the United States - and the question of whether the written law would truly be simplified by a single constitutional document.

"The most potent argument against a codified constitution is, as it seems to me, the degree of inflexibility which it necessarily, and intentionally, imposes. However wise, well-balanced and comprehensive the terms of a constitution may be at the time of its adoption, the passage of time is bound to render some of its provisions obsolete, mischievous or embarrassing."

 

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies on the Judicial Office website. To find out more about the cookies, see our privacy policy.