sitemap | help
Click here to access to our stories featuring images from our collections and related materials ranging from Unusual takes, voices to biographies and more. Click here to find a feature debate and other debates related to some of our subjects and topics found with the READ section, please note, you need to be a registered user to participate in debates Click here to browse or search for images and related materials.  Alternatively use the advanced search for more detailed queries. Click here to create your own web galleries using our image collections or to personalise your experience within Ingenious.  Please note that you need to be a registered user to work with the CREATE tools.  Go to the 'Register' link to utilise Ingenious Create Tools Menu Log in Menu Search
Spacer image
Spacer image
save to my links [ + ]read caption
Topic: The Medium
The Medium
Picture: 10400466s2ebed.jpg

TV astronomer Patrick Moore has inspired generations of star-gazers since 1957, now augmented by a comprehensive website hosted by the BBC.
Credit: Patrick Moore


Do you feel dumb? According to a variety of experts you should. Accusations of dumbing down science have been flying thick and fast for centuries. Mathematician Charles Babbage published The Decline of British Science in 1830, acc

Genuine consultation is essential if science is to be celebrated by the public

using the scientific establishment of elitism. The same establishment points accusatory fingers of falling standards today, mainly at the state of science on TV.

Much of the creative side of television is in the hands of bright young things for whom the word ‘mouse’ has only distant zoological connotations. They wield sophisticated computer technology, allowing full scope for their imagination. The flesh and colour of dinosaurs is extrapolated from musty fossil skeletons, the Big Bang is simulated in a visual spectacle, and molecules are invested with personalities. All this makes for highly gawpable TV.

Picture: 10322921s2ebed.jpg
Charles Babbage, mathematician and pioneer of machine computing, c 1860s.
Credit: Science Museum/Science & Society Picture Library
Critics level accusations of shameless sentimentality and science-as-soap-opera, but these programmes garner previously unimagined audience figures for science-based programmes. If you’ve enjoyed Walking with Dinosaurs, you’re more likely to take a waltz through a museum, or wrangle with a book on the subject. More information on science is available than ever before, and the public verdict is ‘Bring it on!’.

A less obvious technological revolution is taking place at the interface between mass media and its previously passive audience. Suddenly TV is no longer a one-way form of communication. Almost every science programme comes with a website as standard, and you’re encouraged to join in. Choose your level of engagement: take part in a poll on an issue; se
Picture: 10415156s2ebed.jpg
The first recorded television picture taken from a TV screen, 1926.
Credit: NMPFT
nd a comment to programme makers; or engage in discussions ranging from parallel universes to designer babies.

The trend towards creating a space for voices to be heard, a type of democratisation, is a crucial one for science. It is only relatively recently that policy-makers have realised that garnering support for science is not a case of shouting more loudly, it’s about listening more carefully. Genuine consultation is essential if science is to be celebrated by the public rather than condemned as arrogant and authoritarian. By taking the first step, providing a non-threatening forum for public engagement with science, television is doing science a great service.

Spacer image

Spacer image
Topic: The Message
Spacer image
Although scientific breakthroughs are thrilling and scientists often lead interesting lives, they publish their results in a deliberately jargon-filled and often turgid style. Newspapers want hype and drama, but scientists feel ill-equipped to met this demand. Is ‘dumbing down’ the only solution?  > more

Spacer image
Topic: The Motive
Spacer image
Why do scientists need to bother with the popularisation of science? Because modern science cannot ignore the general public. Science needs political support for research funds and liberal laws. It has to become more appealing or lose that support.  > more
Click here to print this page in a printer friendly format  > Printer friendly version > Back to top
© NMSI. All rights reserved. | terms of use | sitemap | contact us | accessibility | privacy | who we are
Spacer image
Spacer image
Read More
Please click here to explore this topic further and to access our our stories featuring images from our collections and related materials ranging from Unusual takes, voices to biographies and more.
If your browser is not javascript enabled then click here to Read More. To learn how to javascript enable your browser click here.
  right arrow Voices - of people involved
  right arrow Unusual Takes - the unexpected angle

See caption
Topic: The Medium - click here to see related images
Related to: