Herding Catapults

When we first started thinking about the need for physical centres to support innovation in the summer of 2009, we had some very specific ideas.  At that point, we had been an agency for just over two years and we were beginning to understand the specifics of several of the areas we were supporting – and saw what adding a physical centre to the infrastructure could achieve.  We also had the heritage of the Micro- and Nano-Technology Centres to deal with – where one version of a centres concept had been implemented in too distributed a manner – so had developed very clear views about the need for focus and clarity of purpose.

The use of centres was not a new insight, and others had developed the idea before, but we saw real complementarity with our existing tools and we talked about our new enthusiasm to anyone who would listen.  The Government of the day commissioned Hermann Hauser to investigate the potential for centres as a new component of the UK innovation landscape.  His report was duly delivered and proselytised.  Meanwhile, James Dyson had been looking at innovation and published a broader view of the innovation landscape but nonetheless made similar suggestions about the need for centres.  Although the change of government caused a slight delay in the process, the Coalition recognised the logic of the argument and the Prime Minster announced the setting up of an elite network of technology and innovation centres in October 2010 – and gave us responsibility for making it happen.

The first phase was conceptually easy – although it turned out to be fraught with practical challenges – because we had in mind our ideas from the previous year.  Centres would have a strong element of shared equipment – whether it was expensive, fast-developing or difficult to operate didn't matter that much, it was equipment that was vital to achieve rapid progress.  There was also an element of the need for multidisciplinary working, but we were aware of the counter argument that, in a globally connected world, this could be achieved virtually.  The High-value Manufacturing Catapult and the Offshore Renewable Energy Catapult are good examples of this sort of centre.  In both cases, the importance of providing central resources had been already recognised – and so there were already centres out there, distributed around the UK localised in areas of strength.  The development of the Catapults in these areas will be largely concerned with coordinating, extending and building upon these existing activities.

 The Cell Therapy and Satellite Applications Catapults represent a subtle evolution of this concept.  In addition to the need for shared equipment, because they are less wellestablished as areas of activity, they are much more dependent for success on multidisciplinary working and have complex supply chains that have to operate synchronously for the final products and services to be delivered. They also share a high cost of final testing – either for safety and efficacy in humans or by launching into space!  Both these Catapults are being set up as single centres to maximise the focus for the totality of UK activities, and they need to build inclusive communities around them.

 The Catapults in the next phase, the first of which was announced at the end of January, are different again.  Over the last year or so, we have been consulting widely on where we should focus this third tranche of centres.  We have, not surprisingly, had a lot of suggestions about where we should invest the money and effort.  Because we stimulated the thinking in several different areas, we got a lot of comparable feedback from different areas in at the same time.  That enabled us to see patterns in the responses we might not have seen if we had carried out the exercise over a longer timeframe.  What we saw was convergence in several areas – and it is in those areas that we are proposing to set up Catapults.

 It will not have escaped anyone's notice that the digital world is inexorably melding with the physical world.  The music industry was first to notice the effects – the need to develop wholly new business models, the challenge of controlling distribution rights for a product that is inherently digital and so on.  The rest of the media industry is now on a similar path.  The retail industry is already changing and who knows what will be next.  Many other sectors are capable of being "digitised" and going through variations of the changes that these areas have already gone through.  Already we are seeing the transfer of knowledge and practices between these different markets, and we are noticing that those who learn from the earlier transformations seem to be taking advantage of the change rather being adversely affected by it.  This need to transfer insight and knowledge from one area to another – very different – one, combined with the range of technologies needed to make the changes, is why this new Connected Digital Economy will be the subject of a Catapult.

 The final two areas will be announced in the coming weeks and are likely to have similar characteristics to the Connected Digital Economy Catapult.

 There were other areas that we looked at as possible Catapults.  The same consultation process has led us to believe that in these areas, although there is strong potential, centres are not part of the answer at the moment.  Instead, we will implement programmes using our conventional tools to address the innovation challenges we gathered from these communities.

 The quest to implement a new network of centres to accelerate innovation in the UK has been a fascinating one.  We have learned that many of the assumptions we started with are not universally true and that centres are not always the answer.  The timescale over which we have carried out the consultation has also given us a novel view of how apparently different areas can come together.  As a result, we are excited about the Catapults we are now helping into existence - and better prepared for the problems we may encounter as they grow.

 

Last updated on Friday 27 April 2012 at 11:17

  • Recent Comments

    Post your comment
  • David Bott|11/04/12 at 3:58 PM

    Tony

    I am not sure what question you are asking - or what feedback you want! Only the High Value Manufacturing Catapult is up and running - and since it was built out of pre-existing components many of which have a track record of delivery and impact, you can search their own websites for relevant stories. The Offshore Renewable Energy, Cell Therapies and Satellite Applications will all be opening later this year and Connected Digital Economy, Future Cities and Transport Systems are being specified and built to open early next year. We don't expect measurable impact for a while yet, but all these areas have identifiable growth markets and strong UK capability.

    As to Iain's quote - which was originally that we are "the UK's best kept secret" - is a source of frustration to us that many companies do not know about us and therefore cannot be supported by our programmes. We publish press releases of those who are successful in our competitions and success stories of both projects and programmes. It feels like many in the UK are happier bemoaning our (national) lack of success than helping spread the word that there are many innovative and successful companies in the UK!

    David

    tony smee|06/04/12 at 5:51 PM

    Hi David,
    Why no feedback? All the compliments and positive comments seem to be masking some basic economics.
    Can the public not know when a catapult centre has actually done something that earned money, or created jobs, or stimulated growth.
    It was interesting to hear Iain Gray call the TSB Swindon's greatest kept secret. Why so secretive & mysterious? Why not share some of the "cutting edge technology" with the rest of society.

    Colin Sworder|02/04/12 at 11:25 AM

    There seems to be no appreciation of the off-grid markets. The include the whole of rural and urban Asia, Africa and South America. These markets are orders of magnitude larger than the subsidised, Western economies present, and funding is becoming available. The model is different from traditional centralised power generation distributed by a grid. Community sized Renewable Energy power generation, close to the point of consumption is affordable and can provide reliable power. Off-grid power systems require much greater systems design and integration than grid-tied schemes. These markets require a commercially viable model There are no subsidies and probably never will be.

    Richard Miller, Head of Sustainability|27/03/12 at 10:58 AM

    Chris
    Thank you for your comments. We are very conscious that future cities will inevitably contain emergent features that arise unplanned from the way in which people use the infrastructure, as well as designed and planned features. A city is not an engineering problem that can be attempted without accounting for people. We are therefore keen that the social and behavioural sciences play their full part in the Catapult alongside the infrastructural technologies.

    One of the key messages that came through in the consultation process was the need to put citizens at the heart of the city, and to create cities with a strong economy, a light environmental footprint and a great quality of life. We can’t do that by ignoring the human side of cities. How to best fully integrate the human and technological is a subject for more debate as we begin to shape the Catapult.

    Chris|22/03/12 at 12:19 PM

    Whilst the announcement of the catapults is very welcome and urgent in many respects, I am interested in with respect to the future cities catapult how the vertical and horizontal integration between the communities that occupy the space will have direct meaningful involvement in the development of new technologies that shape that space. we have experimented in the past with utopian ideals of the new town idea but top down clearly doesnt work. However ther is clearly a need to ensure that UK cities do adopt cutting edge approaches to remain competitive but equally places people want to live rather than derive a living.

Leave a Comment
*Required fields
Please enter the contents of the verification image. This is to help us prevent automated ‘spam’ comments.
Post comment
Copyright © 2013