Office of Public Sector Information

Office of Public Sector Information

Navigation

Main navigation

 16 May 2009

Photographs of Lords and MPs

Posted in: Creative Commons | Parliament              

42 Supporters so far - add your name

Posted by: Joe Anderson

Public Sector Information Holder: UK Parliament

Information Asset: Photographs of Lords and MPs

The problem

Wikipedia can't use pictures the British Parliament has of its members as they are not licensed under a free licence (one which allows them to copied, modified, and redistributed, even commercially).

My ideal solution

I would like Parliament to license its photographs under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 2.5 UK: Scotland (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.5/scotland/), Attribution-Share Alike 2.0 UK: England & Wales (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.0/uk/) or Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/)

What I would do

Upload photographs to Wikipedia, or similar sites, and include them in the relevant pages.

Posted at Saturday, 16 May 2009 18:19:55 (GMT Standard Time, UTC+00:00)  Comments [2] #   

 7 July 2008

Efficiency & Fairness White Paper

Posted in: Copyright notice | Creative Commons | OPSI | White Paper              

4 Supporters so far - add your name

Posted by: William Heath

Public Sector Information Holder: Office of Public Sector Information

Information Asset: Efficiency & Fairness white paper and future white papers

The problem

This is a minor irritation not a big issue. But the (c) Crown copyright notice on recent Cabinet Office Excellence and fairness white paper reads:

"The text in this document may be reproduced free of charge in any format or media without requiring specific permission. This is subject to the material not being used in a derogatory manner or in a misleading context."

This sounds like a tax on dissent. It casts government in a bad light because it's hard to see how it would be enforced or damages assessed.

My ideal solution

Wouldn't
It
Be
Better
If
(Wibbi)
there were simply a crown copyright or creative commons notice, and people were allowed to quote this publicly paid-for material for any purpose - critical, satirical, polemic or just plain old discussing policy which is surely what a white paper is intended for.

What I would do

Exactly the same as I do now, except I wouldnt gripe about it.

Also we would all lose that nagging feeling that
a) we might face sanctions for quoting extracts and being critical and
b) government is still being paranoid and unreasonable.

Posted at Monday, 07 July 2008 09:34:44 (GMT Standard Time, UTC+00:00)  Comments [1] #