Skip to main content | section navigation
You are in :
8 May 2009 HEFCE logo
To  Heads of HEFCE-funded further education colleges
Telephone 0117 931 7317
Facsimile 0117 931 7203

Circular letter number 10/2009

For further information contact David Hill, tel 0117 931 7482, e-mail

Dear Principal

Capital funding for directly funded further education colleges for 2009-10: allocations for the period April to July 2009

1.   This letter sets out the allocation of capital funding for learning and teaching infrastructure in further education colleges (FECs) funded directly by HEFCE for the four months April to July 2009 (see Annex A). Allocations for colleges that are members of HEFCE-recognised consortia led by an FEC are included within the lead colleges’ allocations.

2.   A total of £20 million is being provided for the financial year 2009-10, but it will not be possible to calculate the allocations for the final eight months until June 2009. This is due to some colleges becoming directly funded from August 2009 as a result of HEFCE-recognised consortia dissolving, along with a number of other data changes.

3.   Funding for the period August 2009 to March 2010 will, therefore, be advised in July 2009.

Purpose of the funds

4.   The allocations for 2009-10 are to help raise the quality of higher education (HE) learning and teaching facilities in FECs, in order to enhance the learning experience of their HE students. We expect colleges to use the funds in ways that will support their strategy for HE most effectively. The funds may be used to contribute towards:

  • investment in equipment, particularly IT-related equipment, used in learning and teaching, and in e-learning
  • replacement of premises for learning and teaching
  • refurbishment of existing teaching spaces, particularly with regard to IT-related enhancements, including improvements to internal IT networks or supporting infrastructure.

5.   The funds should be used for HE provision and may be subject to audit in the normal way. We recognise, however, that it may be neither feasible nor desirable to construct ring-fenced boundaries between higher and further education (FE). For example, equipment may be used by both HE and FE students. So we look to colleges to adopt a pragmatic approach, whereby the primary focus of the projects is on HE even if there are links with, and spin-off benefits at the margin for, FE.

Eligibility and allocation method

6.   This is not a competitive bidding process. All directly funded FECs that meet the conditions in paragraphs 8 and 9 will receive an allocation.

7.   Previously, in allocating capital funds to colleges, we have adopted a formula method for distributing funds that was consistent with our wider policies for funding FECs. These aim to encourage collaboration between institutions, while supporting diversity of provision. We want to discourage small, isolated pockets of HE, and to help develop stronger HE portfolios in the larger HE providers and where there are networks between HE providers. We have decided to continue to use the same method for distributing these capital funds.

Allocations and payment of funds

8.   The allocations for each directly funded FEC are at Annex A. They are based on:

  • 2008-09 resource for mainstream and non-mainstream provision
  • 2008-09 Training and Development Agency for Schools teacher training resource
  • 2008-09 widening participation allocations
  • 2008-09 targeted allocations.

9.   The total resource has been weighted according to the size of the college, based on 2008 09 full-time equivalent (FTE) students. Thus FECs with 800 or more directly funded HE FTE students will receive twice the rate of funds per FTE allocated to colleges with fewer than 800 FTEs. Colleges with fewer than 100 directly funded HE FTE students can access the funds, provided that they are developing their HE activity in collaboration with other FECs and/or higher education institutions so that the aggregate HE provision is at least 100 FTE places.

10.   We shall request a monitoring return for the full year’s funding from colleges in March 2009, reporting on the use of these funds. These returns may be subject to audit. In the event that we are not satisfied that the funds have been used for the purposes described in paragraph 4 we may seek to reclaim some or all of the funding provided.

11.   We expect colleges to take account of the need to reduce carbon emissions – as well as securing value for money – in making decisions about how these funds are spent.

Yours sincerely

Sir Alan Langlands
Chief Executive


Annex A

[ MS Excel 31K ]