| Brendan, thank you for inviting me here today and giving
me the opportunity to talk about what I believe to be one of the most
important priorities for government, unions and industry.
And, despite what is sometimes written in the media, I believe that
we share a common vision for manufacturing in our country.
We all want a successful manufacturing sector producing value-added
products and well-paid, highly skilled jobs. You and I know that the
best of British manufacturing is, and always has been, the best in the
world and that's why it has a future.
British manufacturing doesn't 'live on thin air' it:
· accounts for a sixth of our national output;
· contributes over £150 billion to the economy;
· employs 3.5 million people; and it
· supports 2.4 million service sector jobs.
Since I have been Secretary of State, I have made clear that
'manufacturing matters'. I have actively driven a pro-Manufacturing
approach in my department and within Government.
That's why I published the first manufacturing strategy for over 30
years after close consultation with both industry and unions. The
strategy is not a passive document. It sets out clear approach and
argues that Government, Industry and Unions all have the responsibility
to help improve the sector.
Industry - committing to skills development, to investment and best
practice;
and Unions - helping to develop high performance workplaces and better
skills for the workforce and your members.
Because this is the only way we are going to help British
manufacturing compete in a challenging global economy.
· Look at China - the world's largest population is set to become
the world's largest economy - now producing four times as many graduates
as a decade ago;
· or India - three million graduates a year - literate, skilled,
productive and with comparatively low wages, yet huge purchasing power;
· and the new Central and Eastern European Member States of the EU -
many with wages a fraction of ours - now in the single market.
We are never going to be compete on cost alone - and nor should we
try to. Our response must be innovation - using faster, cleaner
processes to offer high value products and services that the world wants
to buy.
In government there is a lot we can do to help promote innovation. At
the DTI - and I must say rumours of our demise have been much
exaggerated - it is our top priority.
We are the Department of Trade and Industry, but I see my department
as much as the Department for Trade and Innovation - because innovation
policy is part and parcel of our industrial policy.
We no longer accept the approach that says 'invest first, innovate
later' - because it doesn't work. Not for the companies who ended up
going to the wall, or the workers who lost their jobs because the
business was uncompetitive.
Instead we invest in innovation - to help create the new
manufacturing companies of the future.
Like the National Metals Technology Centre in South Yorkshire -
funded by a £3million DTI/RDA grant, working with our universities to
ensure that 'Made in Sheffield' has the same resonance in the 21st
century as it had in the last.
Or the Institute of Bioinformatics in Durham, again funded with a
£4million DTI/RDA grant, bringing the best research, clinical and
engineering expertise together to create the new wonder drugs of the
future.
Great examples of investment in innovation. But this is not the whole
picture. We do have world-beating companies in the UK, but we also have
too few of them. So we are working hard to spread the success of the
best to the rest.
We've more than doubled the Science Budget since 1997 to £3.3
billion by 2007/8. And we've increased resources for knowledge and
technology transfer, so that manufacturers can capitalise on it.
We've extended the R&D tax credit regime, which is already
providing £600m of assistance, so that more manufacturing companies
benefit from it.
Just this week the DTI received £205m to drive forward our
Technology strategy. This will be of huge benefit to manufacturing
companies - aerospace, automotive and IGTs are all set to benefit from
this investment.
And the spending round has secured £12million to the hugely
successful Manufacturing Advisory Service - a programme that has boosted
manufacturing by more than £53million, delivering an average £100,000
added value to every manufacturer that goes through the full programme.
I also recognise - as Brendan, and others have said today - the
impact public procurement can have in driving innovation through our
manufacturing sector.
Government has a key role to play through the goods and services it
procures, in driving innovation and growth in manufacturing. I believe
that public procurement in the UK is rightly underpinned by principles
of fair and open competition - protectionism would not be in the
long-term interests of either the manufacturing sector or the British
taxpayer.
But, I recognise that we must do more to give UK based manufacturers
the support and information needed to compete more effectively for
Government contracts both at home and abroad.
We are making progress here too. Together with the Secretary of State
for Defence we have established a coherent Defence Industrial Strategy
for the first time. A strategy that acknowledges the positive impact
major defence projects can have both on the UK's economy and
manufacturing jobs.
This is, of course, just the beginning. The action plan we're setting
out today ensures we keep up the momentum. I'm delighted that Kevin
Smith of GKN and Jacqui Smith, Minister for Industry will jointly chair
a Manufacturing Forum, working with unions and others to take the plan
forward and monitor it's delivery.
We recognise the huge restructuring that has taken place in UK
manufacturing in the last few decades. I am not blind to the loss of
traditional manufacturing jobs. I know the pain and uncertainty caused
to workers, their families and communities because I've seen them first
hand in my own constituency in Leicester, once the centre of Britain's
textile and clothing industry.
But my real concern is that, while we understand the pain of those
who have lost their jobs, we risk putting off new recruits in the sector
by talking down it's prospects for the future.
Contrary to the popular myth that there are no jobs left in UK
manufacturing - the reality is that - according to figures published
yesterday - there are nearly 64,000 vacancies in the sector.
That's 64,000 jobs that need filling today with skilled, enthusiastic
people. But what chance do we have of filling these - of recruiting the
engineers and technicians of the future - if all young people ever hear
is 'doom and gloom' about the sector?
Yes, in a global economy the sector faces challenges, but the fact is
new jobs in manufacturing are being created all the time. Around 250,000
manufacturing vacancies were reported to Jobcentre Plus in the last year
alone. So let's not talk the sector down, British manufacturing has a
good story to tell and there are good jobs that need filling.
We need to get more people into manufacturing jobs, which is why I
can say today that Charles Clarke and I want to work more closely with
the unions, business and other stakeholders, to ensure there is a steady
stream of people emerging from our educational institutions with the
right skills needed for a career in modern manufacturing.
To do this, I believe we need to actively promote a positive image of
the sector in schools, both to children and teachers.
We need to look at the bigger picture in the sector - and the
encouraging signs for the future.
In 2003 manufacturing output in the UK grew 0.4% - above the US
(0.3%) and Germany (0.2%), and above that in France, where output fell
(-0.7%). Orders are also picking up, and productivity is up over a fifth
since 1997.
Manufacturing productivity increased by over a fifth between 1997 and
2003 - and export volumes in the UK are up by 75% in the last 10 years
and have doubled in the last 15 years.
As you know Britain remains the top inward investment destination in
Europe - with projects up 14% on last year - and it's great news that
this year 30% of them were in high value manufacturing like electronics,
biotechnology, and pharmaceuticals.
And I warmly welcome the fact that the numbers of Modern
Apprenticeship trainees, surely one of the best barometers for the
sectors future, is up from 75,000 in 1997 to over 255,000 this year.
If we are going to build confidence we also need to celebrate our
manufacturing successes, to draw attention to those leading-edge
industries where British based companies, and their workers, lead the
world:
· Our aerospace industry - the largest outside the US - a market
forecast to grow by at least 25 per cent in real terms, to £250 billion
a year in the next 20 years;
· Our car industry - which contributes over £8.5 billion to the
economy, employing almost a quarter of a million people.
· Our biotechnology sector is the largest in Europe - 2nd only to
the US, and our pharmaceuticals industry - worth £250 billion - is
growing at a rate of almost 5% a year.
Of course, I recognise that championing the best will not, on its
own, overcome some of the problems of the rest. Unions and manufacturers
want the Government to 'put its money where its mouth is' and I
understand that.
But through our manufacturing strategy - delivered in partnership
with unions and industry, with today's review of that strategy, and with
our recent spending settlement - that is exactly what we are doing.
To close - we can't stop the shift of low value, labour intensive
production to lower wage economies. Manufacturing, like all other areas
of our economy must compete on the basis of value-added and high skills.
But the strategy and the action plan we're publishing today - driven
forward by the Manufacturing Forum - shows us the way forward.
Now is the time everyone to focus on a positive future for British
manufacturing.
Thank You.
|