This snapshot, taken on
04/01/2012
, shows web content acquired for preservation by The National Archives. External links, forms and search may not work in archived websites and contact details are likely to be out of date.
 
 
The UK Government Web Archive does not use cookies but some may be left in your browser from archived websites.
Skip to main content
Main content

News

Hedgerows can be managed better for wildlife

28 December 2011, by Adele Rackley

Simple changes to hedgerow management could significantly improve winter habitats and food supplies for wildlife, according to new research by the Centre for Ecology & Hydrology.

Hawthorn

Hedgerow berries are an essential food for small mammals and birds, including blackbirds, fieldfares and redwings, and their flowers provide nectar for pollinating insects. When and how often hedges are trimmed makes a big difference to the amount of both flowers and berries they produce.

'These emerging results have national and even international implications, as there are an increasing number of countries implementing agri-environment schemes or other forms of hedgerow management regulations,' says Dr Joanna Staley of the Centre for Ecology & Hydrology, who led the research.

The study, published in Biological Conservation, compared the effects of different management regimes on hawthorn hedges over five years. It found that cutting every three years rather than annually produced 2.1 times more flowers and 3.4 times the mass of berries.

Cutting every two years also increased flowers and berry provision, but the increase in berry weight depended on the hedges being cut in late winter rather than autumn.

Hedgerows have been part of our landscape for centuries and are important for farming, culture and archaeology as well as wildlife. They have to be actively managed to stop them spreading.

Common practice is to cut them back every year, typically in late summer or early autumn directly after harvest, which removes young berries before winter starts. In England, 41 per cent of hedgerows are now under one of three agri-environment scheme (AES) options, which aim to reduce cutting frequency to increase the flowers and berries available to wildlife. The most popular option, which covers 32 per cent of managed hedgerows in England, is to cut every two years.

So measures are in place to manage hedges in the interests of wildlife, but this is the first time the benefits of each scheme have been rigorously tested and compared.

The research team carried out their five-year experiment in Cambridgeshire. They managed 32 sections of hawthorn hedge by cutting back every one, two or three years, either in autumn or winter.

The team then used a simple model to explore the impacts of their results on England's hedgerows. This showed that moving to a three-year cutting regime would substantially increase the resources available to over-wintering birds and pollinators in most years.

If those hedges currently under the most popular AES option (cutting every two years) were instead managed under a three-year cutting regime, the weight of berries would increase by an estimated 40 per cent.

Alternatively, if these were timed every two years in later winter rather than autumn, berry weight is estimated to increase by 20 per cent.

There are further benefits to cutting in winter rather than autumn. For example several butterfly species lay eggs in late summer or early autumn, many of which may be removed if hedgerows are cut before they hatch. The decline of the brown hairstreak butterfly population – a species considered seriously under threat in the UK – has been partly attributed to annual trimming of hedgerows.

'It's fortunate that we effectively have a ready-made channel in the AES that can quickly turn these findings into action,' says Staley.

'We are broadening the research to cover a wider range of hedgerow species and across more sites to allow us to generate robust evidence to help revise and improve future policies,' she concludes.

This study is part of ongoing research funded by DEFRA, in partnership with Natural England.


Staley, JT et al. Long-term effects of hedgerow management policies on resource provision for wildlife. Biological Conservation, (2011). doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2011.09.006


Interesting? Spread the word using the 'tools' menu on the right.


Your comments

The evidence is there from trials; it is also there from simple seasonal observation. Year after year, the flail appears earlier and with more savage results on the otherwise wonderful mixed hedges of our quiet Shropshire lanes. Last year the cutting began on August 8th and continued for 3 months, taking every last hawberry, rosehip, blackberry, sloe, wild apple and plum and reducing these dying hedgerows to 'hedgehog', gappy stumps, needing the addition of fencing to be stock-proof.
Each year I have seen the flocks of fieldfares and redwings reduce; the autumn and winter food is no longer there for them.
I can only hope that agri-environment schemes do not come too late to save what used to be a vital food-resource network. I suggest that the principal difficulty to overcome is the peer pressure exerted on local farmers preventing them from letting their hedges grow and expand, even for a year or two. It is deemed that you're a lazy and untidy farmer if you don't cut your hedges, every year, within an inch of their lives.
A cultural change is needed - I can only hope that the NFU and similar bodies will become active in urgently promoting that change.

B. Farr, Shropshire, UK
Monday, 2 January 2012 - 20:49