- The applicant may appeal to the High Court if -
- the Secretary of State makes a decision of the kind mentioned in section 84(3)(b), and
- the High Court gives permission for an appeal against the decision.
- On such an appeal, the High Court must make its decision only on the basis of the evidence that was available to the Secretary of State.
- If the High Court decides that it appears as mentioned in condition A in section 82, it must make an order to that effect.
- Otherwise it must dismiss the appeal.
- A conviction or caution to which an order under subsection (3) relates becomes a disregarded conviction or caution when the period of 14 days beginning with the day on which the order was made has ended.
- There is no appeal from a decision of the High Court under this section.
89. Appeal against refusal to disregard convictions or cautions
The Public Reading Stage was open for comments for three weeks from 15 February to 7 March 2011 and has now closed. Your suggestions will be considered by Parliamentarians as the Bill passes through the House of Commons. Thank you for your suggestions.

March 5, 2011 at 8:30 pm
I do not understand the rationale behind 2. If the Secretary of State has not sought out sufficient relevant information, but that information does exist, then surely the judiciary should be in a position to consider that information as part of a hearing. This basically seems to be assessing whether the Secretary of State made an appropriate decision rather than whether the Secretary of State undertook sufficient research to make that decision.
Is it common for an appeal against a decision by the High Court to be prevented by statute?