This snapshot, taken on
10/08/2011
, shows web content acquired for preservation by The National Archives. External links, forms and search may not work in archived websites and contact details are likely to be out of date.
 
 
The UK Government Web Archive does not use cookies but some may be left in your browser from archived websites.
Cabinet Office

6. Persons convicted of an offence outside England and Wales

After section 63H of the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 (for which see section 5) insert -

“63I Retention of material: persons convicted of an offence outside England and Wales

  1. This section applies to material falling within subsection (2) relating to a person who is convicted of an offence under the law of any country or territory outside England and Wales.
  2. Material falls within this subsection if it is -
    1. fingerprints taken from the person under section 61(6D) (power to take fingerprints without consent in relation to offences outside England and Wales), or
    2. a DNA profile derived from a DNA sample taken from the person under section 62(2A) or 63(3E) (powers to take intimate and non-intimate samples in relation to offences outside England and Wales).
  3. The material may be retained indefinitely.”

The Public Reading Stage was open for comments for three weeks from 15 February to 7 March 2011 and has now closed. Your suggestions will be considered by Parliamentarians as the Bill passes through the House of Commons. Thank you for your suggestions.

4 Responses to 6. Persons convicted of an offence outside England and Wales

  1. If the offence was not breaking any of our own countries laws then the data should be destroyed.

    All the data should be dealt with according to our laws, if the data was obtained in a way that would not be allowed in this country then it should be destroyed.

    The data should not be held indefinitely by default it should be held in accordance with the previous sections of this bill.

    I am only talking about British citizens and not citizens of other countries.

    • grumpy old woman says:

      In one breath we support the Government looking into the ECoHR decision in the S v Marper case and in another we say that we should not retain biometric data of those who commit offences outside of the UK.

      Where we believe that the UK should abide by and adapt to decisions taken by the ECoHR then we should remember that we are a part of Europe and so, at the very least, we should consider those offences committed by UK nationals which contravene the laws of other European countries.

      We should also remember that in this day of modern technology it is not unheard of for offences to be committed abroad without the perpetrator ever leaving UK soil.

  2. Neil Macehiter says:

    Why is this material held indefinitely by default

  3. John Jackson says:

    There can be no justification for keeping material, unless the offence is a “Qualifying Offence” in the UK.