Data monitoring and evaluation
Advice, examples and resources to help you use data when evaluating to improve school performance.
Data monitoring and evaluation topics
Refine by:
- Select Year
-
DDLSL RAISEonline: an essential tool for school improvement
These two training sessions aim to develop data-literate school leaders (DDLSL). There is one session for primary leaders and one for secondary leaders and each contains a presentation, presenter's notes, handouts, a RAISEonline full report for 2010 and a delegate’s workbook.
-
DDLSL RAISEonline: an essential tool for school improvement – Primary
Data-literacy is promoted using RAISEonline reports in a CPD training package aimed at school leaders which includes a comprehensive delegate’s handbook for reference. The PowerPoint provides opportunity for interaction with the school’s own RAISEonline report and the anonymous report provided, noting observations in the delegate’s workbook.
-
DDLSL RAISEonline: an essential tool for school improvement – Secondary
Data-literacy is promoted using RAISEonline reports in a CPD training package aimed at school leaders which includes a comprehensive delegate’s handbook for reference. The presentations provide opportunity for interaction with the school’s own RAISEonline report and the anonymous report provided, noting observations in the delegate’s workbook.
-
-
ESP Data library
Develop your use of data with the range of materials in the Evaluating School Performance (ESP) library.
-
Achievement in sixth forms
Describes the three main value added systems for judging achievement and standards in a sixth form: Advanced Level Information System (ALIS), Advanced Level Performance System (Alps) and Learner Achievement Tracker (LAT).
-
Alps benchmarks and database - 2010
Alps (Advanced Level Performance System) is a system of analysis and training used to raise student achievement and participation in post-16 A, AS and BTEC qualifications. This paper describes the Alps database and benchmark data for the A level benchmark.
-
Average point scores
Describes how the various types of APS are derived: Pupil APS, Subject APS, Overall Key Stage 1 APS and Overall Key Stage 2 APS.
-
Comparisons
The comparison of pupils' attainment and progress with the expectations and estimates that you have for them and with external benchmarks is a key element of the school evaluation process.
-
Confidence in results
Describes the concept of confidence in analysing pupil performance.
-
Contextual information
Advice on collecting and using contextual information to create a more complete picture of a school and analyse pupil progress.
-
Contextual value added
Describes a sequence of four steps to show contextual value added for a pupil. Step 1, prior attainment, gives the best estimate of results. Step 2 adds characteristics such as gender and EAL. Step 3 adjusts the estimate based on the school's prior attainment, and Step 4 calculates the contextual value added as the difference between the estimated result and the actual one.
-
Contextual value added scatter plots
Describes the use of the plots to show results when contextual factors (such as special education needs) have already been taken into account in the graph and so the reasons are more likely to be within the control of the school. RAISEonline results can be filtered to show particular groups.
-
Contextual value added school score
Explains how the score is affected by the shrinkage factor which draws school scores towards the national mean. Multiplying the average of all pupil scores by the shrinkage factor gives the final school contextual value added measure.
-
Contextual value added snake plot
Interactive tool to foster understanding of confidence levels and school comparison generally through the contextually value added snake plot. Each school is indicated by its pink confidence interval and schools with small confidence intervals are obscured by the others. The blue line indicates each school's contextual value added score in percentile rank order.
-
Conversion data
Describes how conversion tables and conversion matrices can show how prior attainment predicts levels, and the kinds of investigations that this may prompt.
-
Families
Describes how London's 'families' of schools allow comparison of pupil achievement data.
-
Introduction to Advanced Level Information System
Introduction to the Advanced Level Information System (ALIS), which provides performance indicators for post-16 students across all sectors of education and includes analysis of A level, AS level, Applied A Levels, BTEC National and International Baccalaureate Examinations.
-
Introduction to CEM Secondary Pre-16 Information Systems
An introduction to the pre-16 information systems from the Centre for Evaluation & Monitoring, including the Middle Years Information System (MidYIS) and Year Eleven Information System (Yellis). These information systems provide innovative tests used to form a baseline for value added measures in secondary schools.
-
Level analysis
Looking at current attainment by the percentage of pupils achieving a level or grade helps to compare performance, identify improvement and target resources. The data can be displayed in cumulative levels, threshold levels and actual levels.
-
Matched data
Information on matched data, where individual data about pupils results are matched to their prior attainment and also their background information (gender, ethnicity, etc.).
-
Mean and median
Description and examples of different analysis techniques for assessing pupil data, looking at median, quartiles and percentiles.
-
National comparison charts – post-16
Value added charts allowing comparisons of subjects to national performance, showing performance from a range of prior attainments and taking account of any significant difference from the norm.
-
Ordinal methods
Describes the statistical techniques sometimes used to analyse Key Stage 4 and post-16 data, where point scores are not allocated to grades.
-
P scales
Information about the P scales, including the background, assessment criteria and the importance of these scales in improving the outcome of pupils. P scales are assessment criteria that have been developed to help assess pupils with special educational needs (SEN) who are working below level 1 of the National Curriculum.
-
Percentile rank
Describes the effect of percentile rank in attainment and contextual value added.
-
Performance Indicators in Primary Schools: Feedback report – Key Stages 1 + 2
Report describing the feedback from PIPS assessments available from the end of Year 1 through to the end of Year 6.
-
Point scores
Describes how the point score is calculated by multiplying the NC level by 6, then adding 3. Point score = (Level × 6) & 3. Point scores are the basis for average point score (APS) analyses.
-
Prior attainment
Describes how using a prior attainment value for a pupil shows the progress made by the pupil and the variation not attributed to prior attainment. It provides a basis for setting the pupil's targets.
-
Progress chart
Also known as a chances graph and conversion matrix.
-
Progress in National Curriculum levels
Describes the educational levels in the National Curriculum, which sets standards of attainment for pupils in each subject ranging from levels 1 to 8. For GCSE the range is from A* to G. At the end of each National Curriculum key stage, pupils are expected to reach a certain level.
-
Question level analysis
A question level analysis makes use of a pupil's response to individual questions from national or optional tests.
-
Regression analysis
Describes linear and multiple regression and their role in comparing performance across schools or other groups of data. A regression line is a line drawn through a scatter plot of two variables. The line is chosen so that it comes as close to the points as possible and shows the best fit of the data points.
-
Reports and Analysis wizard
Screenshot from RAISEonline Reports and Analysis wizard, showing how it allows practitioners to view all analyses or select analyses.
-
Residuals and RPIs
Describes residuals in relation to relative performance indicators and how they show departmental and yearly differences in pupil attainment.
-
Scatter plots
Describes the role of scatter graphs in assessing pupil performance and making comparisons.
-
Statistical neighbours
Describes how the results of neighbouring schools comparable to the school whose performance is being measured can be used to create benchmarks.
-
Sublevels
Table showing how levels and sublevels correspond to point scores. Sublevels show 1a as strong, 1b as sound and 1c as a weak level 1.
-
Trend analysis
Explains that trend graphs can use and display data in different ways.
-
Trend graphs
Describes a sequence of four steps to show contextual value added for a pupil. Step 1, prior attainment, gives the best prediction of results. Step 2 adds characteristics such as gender and EAL. Step 3 adjusts prediction based on the school's prior attainment, and Step 4 calculates the contextual value added as the difference between the predicted result and the actual one. Spreadsheets illustrate the steps but the results there may differ from RAISEonline results.
-
Value added graphs
Description and examples of value added graphs for analysing pupil attainment.
-
-
SEN and LDD progression data
Schools, school improvement professionals and local authorities (LAs) can use these data sets from 2007, 2008 and 2009 to benchmark the attainment and progress of learners with special educational needs (SEN) and learning difficulties and disabilities (LDD). They can also find guides to analysing the data, case studies and a target setting resource.
-
Guide to SEN and LDD progression data (2009)
Schools, school improvement professionals and local authorities (LAs) can use this guide alongside the 2007 and 2008 progression data sets to benchmark the attainment and progression of learners with special educational needs (SEN) and learning difficulties and disabilities (LDD). This is part of SEN and LDD progression data.
-
Raising ambition in target setting at a Leicestershire school
This case study looks at how a cross-phase school used the progression materials to raise ambition in target setting for learners with special educational needs (SEN) and learning difficulties and disabilities (LDD). It includes what was done and how, the impact and next steps. This supports SEN and LDD progression data.
-
Extending expectations for 14–25-year-olds at a Medway school
This case study looks at how a school with an autistic unit and further education centre extended high expectations for learners with special educational needs (SEN) and learning difficulties and disabilities (LDD). It includes what was done and how, the impact and next steps. This supports SEN and LDD progression data.
-
Improving assessment, target setting and tracking
This case study looks at how a local authority (LA) worked to improve assessment, target setting and tracking for learners with special educational needs (SEN) and learning difficulties and disabilities (LDD). It includes what was done and how, the impact and next steps. This supports SEN and LDD progression data.
-
-
DDLSL RAISEonline: an essential tool for school improvement – Secondary
Data-literacy is promoted using RAISEonline reports in a CPD training package aimed at school leaders which includes a comprehensive delegate’s handbook for reference. The presentations provide opportunity for interaction with the school’s own RAISEonline report and the anonymous report provided, noting observations in the delegate’s workbook.
-
Effective use of data by LA and school working together to improve pupil progress
David wanted to improve achievement at Key Stage 3 and 4 by establishing a progress-based curriculum underpinned by a bespoke tracking and monitoring system. This is a user-generated case study.
-
Effective use of data by LA and school working together to improve pupil progress
David wanted to improve achievement at Key Stage 3 and 4 by establishing a progress-based curriculum underpinned by a bespoke tracking and monitoring system. This is a user-generated case study.
-
-
No-one left behind: Effective use of performance data to inform Wave 1 and Wave 2 interventions
Remo and Alan record how a secondary school in Haringey used data when tackling underperformance with tailored teaching. This is a user-generated case study.
-
No-one left behind: Effective use of performance data to inform Wave 1 and Wave 2 interventions
Remo and Alan record how a secondary school in Haringey used data when tackling underperformance with tailored teaching. This is a user-generated case study.
-
-
The impact of visual tracking on student progress
Joe discusses raising the achievement of working class boys beyond target expectations. This a user-generated case study.
-
The impact of visual tracking on student progress
Joe discusses raising the achievement of working class boys beyond target expectations. This a user-generated case study.
-
