This collection of evidence rarely steps outside the territory defined by AFs 2 and 3. There is reasonably secure evidence that the pupil fulfils the level 4 criteria for AF2, but the evidence for the use of inference here is limited and the level 4 criteria for AF3 are only partially met. The test paper answers provide some slight evidence of the ability to make comments relevant to AFs 4, 5 and 6 in ways that begin to meet some of the level 4 criteria. In AF2 there are many examples of the level 4 criteria being met. However, within the limits of these tasks, the evidence for AFs 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7 remains undeveloped.
There are level 4 judgements for AFs 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6. This more than meets the minimum requirements for level 4. However, the criteria for AFs 4, 5 and 6 are not met that fully or consistently and the range of evidence in the collection is somewhat limited, so the overall level judgement is low level 4.