This snapshot, taken on
08/01/2011
, shows web content acquired for preservation by The National Archives. External links, forms and search may not work in archived websites and contact details are likely to be out of date.
 
 
The UK Government Web Archive does not use cookies but some may be left in your browser from archived websites.
Advanced search
Top image
Global conversations

David Miliband

(Archived), London

Iraq Defence Agreement

Posted 06 June 2009 by David Miliband  |  4 comments

Iraq will always be divisive in British politics but I hope the announcement today of a new defence agreement will be widely welcomed. UK troops are leaving but we will maintain support for the Iraqi military .  Today our Baghdad embassy representative signed an agreement with the Iraqi Defence Minister on future defence cooperation with Iraq. Once the agreement is ratified by both countries - hopefully later this month - the UK will provide training for the Iraqi navy around the port of Umm Qasr, as well as helping the Iraqis to protect the nearby oil platforms. We will also increase our defence section at the embassy in Baghdad, and provide training in the UK for Iraqi officers.

Engagement at economic level is growing. So is cultural and educational engagement. Now the military relationship can be put on a stable basis.



David Miliband
06 June 2009
Tags:

Share this with:


Recent comments

>> Mr. Secretary, Has the removal of U.K. forces happened sooner, or later than you...<<
James P. Miller
07 June 2009

>> "Iraq will always be divisive in British politics." The news this morning of yet...<<
Slightly Optimistic
07 June 2009

See all comments (5) ›

Have an opinion?




Not a Euro Army

Posted 04 July 2008 by David Miliband  |  6 comments

Sometimes eurosceptics are thought to have good tunes because they are the only ones humming.  On reform of the Common Agricultural Policy and the European Union's financial management there is a pro-European case for reform.  But the truth is that these problems are not the fundamental reason for no votes in referenda on Europe - there are bigger questions about the purpose and direction of the EU.  This is what I tried to address in my speech last night.

Security and defence policy is a hard case and a good case for thinking about the appropriate European role.  NATO is the foundation of security but does not act everywhere and needs civilian and policing complements.  But defence policy is a core national authority so this is a matter for intergovernmental work not the "community method".  On this French and British thinking is similar.  What we need are capabilities to act where NATO doesn't (e.g. Bosnia today) or where it needs partners (e.g. Kosovo).

It's not frightening - it's sensible.



David Miliband
04 July 2008
Tags:

Share this with:


Recent comments

>> When we can all agree on common rules of engagement and military behaviour then perhaps a European...<<
Paul Everest
04 July 2008

>> "these problems are not the fundamental reason for no votes in referenda on Europe" - Quite...<<
James Woodfield
06 July 2008

See all comments (7) ›

Have an opinion?




Full archive of blog entries