This snapshot, taken on
, shows web content acquired for preservation by The National Archives. External links, forms and search may not work in archived websites and contact details are likely to be out of date.
The UK Government Web Archive does not use cookies but some may be left in your browser from archived websites.

Logistics, artillery and engineering roles are crucial posts for women 30 November 2010

The MOD has completed a review into the policy that excludes female members of the Armed Forces from carrying out ground close-combat roles, where they may have to kill the enemy face to face, and decided that it should remain unchanged.

Women play crucial role in front-line operations, from logistics and artillery to engineering and engagement.Women play an active part in front-line operations, undertaking crucial posts in areas such as logistics, artillery and engineering but they cannot join the infantry or serve in small tactical combat arms teams where they are required to close with and kill the enemy face to face.

More women on the front line

The policy was last reviewed in 2002 and the European Commission Equal Treatment Directive requires the UK to conduct a reassessment every eight years. Operations in Iraq and Afghanistan since 2002 meant there was considerably more evidence of women serving on the front line to be reviewed.

The study looked at recent literature on the effectiveness of mixed gender teams in close-combat roles; the roles that women are undertaking in current operations; the experiences of both male and female military personnel who have served together on the front line and evidence from other countries who have deployed women to close with and kill the enemy.

Capability not in doubt

Minister for Defence Personnel, Welfare and Veterans, Andrew Robathan, said: “The Service Chiefs and I all agree that women are fundamental to the operational effectiveness of Britain’s Armed Forces, bringing talent and skills across the board.

"Their capability is not in doubt; they win the highest decorations for valour and demonstrate independence and initiative.

“We looked closely at the findings of this review but the conclusions were inconclusive. There was no evidence to show that a change in current policy would be beneficial or risk free and so a decision was made to take a precautionary approach and maintain the current position.”

Grave consequences

There is no question that some women would be able to meet the standard required of personnel performing in close-combat roles, both physically and psychologically. The key issue is the potential impact of having both men and women in small teams.

Under the conditions of high-intensity close-quarter battle, team cohesion becomes of much greater importance, and failure can have far-reaching and grave consequences.

None of the research has answered the key question of the impact that gender mixing would have on the combat team in close combat conditions. Accordingly, the MOD has decided that the case for lifting the current restrictions on women serving in close combat teams has not been made.

The full report, including the research, has been published on the MOD website.