Frequently asked Questions
To read documents in PDF format you will need a copy of the freely available Adobe Acrobat Reader.
· Letter of appointment from Lord Falconer to Lord Hutton dated 22 July 2003.
from the Secretary of the Cabinet to Permanent Secretaries
dated 7 August 2003 regarding internal disciplinary process.
How much did the Hutton Inquiry cost?
The costs incurred by the Inquiry itself were £1.68 million for the financial year 2003/2004. These are the costs to the Department for Constitutional Affairs, as the sponsor department for the Inquiry. A breakdown of these costs is available on this website. Written Ministerial statements were made in both Houses of Parliament regarding the cost of the Inquiry to Government on 6 May.
When will the Report be published?
Lord Hutton will deliver a statement in Court 76 at the Royal Courts of Justice on Wednesday 28 January 2004, the date on which his report will be published. The statement will be delivered at 12.30pm after the report has been laid before Parliament but before its publication. This timing was arranged after discussions between Lord Hutton, the DCA and House authorities. The statement will be a substantial summary of Lord Hutton's findings. Publication of the Report will take place at 1.30pm.
Will Lord Hutton be holding a press conference?
Lord Hutton will read out his statement summarising his Report to
the media in Court 76 at the Royal Courts of Justice on 28 January, beginning at 12.30pm.
The Court will be open at 11.45am. He will not give media interviews before or after passing his Report
to Lord Falconer, nor will he be taking questions from the media in the Royal Courts of Justice.
Will members of the public be able to attend?
Yes. Although this is primarily a media event, 10 seats will be
made available in Court 76 at the Royal Courts of Justice. The Court will open at 11.45am. An annex, in Court 75,
will also be set up, where there will be seating for 40 members of the public who will be able to view
the statement on screens. Seats will be available on a 'first come' 'first served' basis.
Tickets for the public will be allocated by staff at the Royal
Courts of Justice at 10.00am on Wednesday 28 January, at the Bell
Yard entrance of the Royal Courts of Justice.
Will the Report, or just an executive summary, go on the website?
The Report will be published in full on this website in both HTML and PDF format at 1.30pm on 28 January, at the same time as the Report is published in Parliament.
A copy of Lord Hutton's statement to the media on 28 January will also be posted on this website.
What will happen to the Inquiry now?
There will be no further statements about the Report from or on behalf of the
Inquiry, once the Report is published. The secretariat will continue in place
for a few weeks to pay bills and transfer documents to the National Archives.
Can anyone submit further evidence to the Inquiry once it is published?
No. Lord Hutton has completed his Report.
How soon after presenting the Report to Lord Falconer will it be provided to Parliament?
Immediately - statements will be made by the Prime Minister in the Commons and by Lord Falconer in the Lords on 28 January.
Who, if anyone, will receive an advance copy of the Report?
Lord Hutton intends that the six parties represented at the Inquiry will have 24 hours notice of the Report.
Parties will be required to sign an undertaking not to reveal the contents of the Report before publication.
Will Opposition party leaders have a chance to read it before it is presented to Parliament?
The Government has announced that the leaders of the Opposition will have access to the Report at 6.00am on the day it is published.
Who are the parties to the Inquiry?
The Parties to the Inquiry are:
Dr Kelly's Family
The Speaker's Council
What happens next with regard to the Coroner's Inquest?
After the Report is published the Coroner will need to decide whether there are grounds for him to reopen his inquest.
What evidence is not being made available?
The following is not being made available:
a. There are about three pages of evidence being withheld on National Security grounds.
b. Some evidence will be redacted before publication to remove
certain sensitive information on personal privacy grounds
e.g. home addresses and telephone numbers.
c. Some evidence will not be published at all on personal
privacy grounds, for example personal witness statements,
chronologies and other notes.
d. We are not disclosing the content of personal witness
statements, notes and chronologies as these are simply advance
notice to the Inquiry of what an individual witness intends
to say. All relevant evidence from these documents will be
or will have been disclosed during examination and thus in
the public domain through the transcripts of evidence given.
e. No one was asked for a witness statement and they are
not a requirement of the Inquiry process. What witnesses were
asked to do was provide a note of any points or issues they
wanted to come out during their examination. The Inquiry did
tell witnesses that these notes would be received under a
duty of confidentiality and would not be disclosed with all
the other evidence by the Inquiry team. Provision of these
notes is a matter for individuals. It is for individual witnesses
to confirm whether or not they have provided them and to release
the contents should they wish to.”
Lord Hutton has also made a statement about
how he has dealt with those submissions made to the Inquiry after the conclusion
of the hearings stage.
Are providers of information to the Inquiry protected
from future legal proceedings?
The Hutton Inquiry is protected from any legal proceedings
coming from information disclosed during the Inquiry, e.g.
slander and libel, so long as publication of that material
is consistent with the needs of the Inquiry and is not malicious.
Providers of information will need to take their own legal advice
on this matter. The Cabinet Secretary has stated that nothing
which any Government official provides to the Inquiry by way
of evidence, whether orally or in writing, will be used in subsequent
disciplinary proceedings against that official or any other
official, subject to the limitations set out in his letter of
Back to Top