This snapshot, taken on
08/09/2010
, shows web content acquired for preservation by The National Archives. External links, forms and search may not work in archived websites and contact details are likely to be out of date.
 
 
The UK Government Web Archive does not use cookies but some may be left in your browser from archived websites.

Are quality assurance schemes cost-effective?

In quality-assured settings the quality of provision is much higher, especially for childminding. However, quality assurance membership is not necessary for settings to achieve an outstanding judgement: many settings not in quality assurance schemes are outstanding. Nor is being part of a quality assurance scheme sufficient to ensure a good or better judgement: many quality assurance scheme members are judged satisfactory and a few inadequate.

Taking part in a quality assurance scheme involves considerable investment of staff time, and often a financial cost. The providers and staff team need to be motivated to work towards achieving the standards of a quality assurance scheme over a sustained period.

Providers themselves see some value but are not always convinced the effort has been worth it in terms of improved outcomes for children or improved take-up by parents.

Girl painting