This snapshot, taken on
05/05/2010
, shows web content acquired for preservation by The National Archives. External links, forms and search may not work in archived websites and contact details are likely to be out of date.
 
 
The UK Government Web Archive does not use cookies but some may be left in your browser from archived websites.

How we work:

Read more about what we do in our editor's highlights

Supporting improvement:

Listening and consulting:

Delivering value for money:

List this issue's full contents

Print this issue

Welcome to the February 2010 issue

Inside view from Her Majesty's Chief Inspector

An article in the last edition of Ofsted News went into some detail in response to a number of myths building up about the new school inspection framework. Following that, we also put on our website answers to a number of ’frequently asked questions’ about the new inspection arrangements to try to resolve any remaining concerns.

Nevertheless these myths are still surfacing from time to time; myths like the one about the school marked down for a hole in its fence, or the school which failed its inspection because the inspector was offered coffee before being asked for identification. And just as concerning for some, are the stories suggesting schools and colleges can’t be found good or outstanding if test and academic results aren’t good, even if children, young people and adult learners are making significant progress against the odds.

Read more