This snapshot, taken on
03/07/2009
, shows web content acquired for preservation by The National Archives. External links, forms and search may not work in archived websites and contact details are likely to be out of date.
 
 
The UK Government Web Archive does not use cookies but some may be left in your browser from archived websites.

Dominic Asquith

Ambassador to Egypt

FCO Logo
Thursday 11 June, 2009

Obama’s speech

Much has already been written, Twittered and spoken about “the speech”.  There’s no denying it was a good one and an important one. It is significant for what it says and the clarity with which it sets out the difficulties we face.

But perhaps more importantly, it gives real prominence (because of who Obama is and where he said what he said) to the fact that there is a group of forward-thinking western leaders trying to grapple with one of the most complex problems we face.  How do we overcome the misperceptions between the West and Islam which foment or are cynically used to foment such inhuman violence? 

These leaders are sincere in their effort and are working on a shared agenda.  But they can’t make the running alone.  Gestures need responses.  In everyday life, gesture and response contain the risk of embarrassment and rejection. But if you sit on your hands or never open your mouth but to say “not interested, don’t believe you”, think how mad you’d go.  Moreover, it’s not natural.

Obama’s speech did not come from a blue sky.  His team have been building up to it.   On the British side,  the Prince of Wales in 2006 (at Al Azhar of course) and David Miliband over the past months have been talking very openly about it. David Miliband even advanced the revolutionary idea that we should get away from seeing Muslims as Muslims, but rather as people who are occupied in a variety of activities.  My first thought about someone is not to say “Oh, she’s a Muslim” and then “she’s also a journalist”. My first thought is “she’s a journalist”.  My second thought may be  “I’d better be careful what I say!”  I genuinely do not think what religion she is.  That’s not lessening the importance of religion in any way.  It’s merely refusing to let a set of preconceptions affect how you respond to someone.

What was odd about the day of the speech was the contrast between the event itself – an extraordinary example of mass communication thanks to modern technology and the draw that Obama manages to have for so many millions of people – taking place in a city that was eerily silent. What happened to 17million Cairenes?  As one Egyptian said to me that day, “What will Obama think? It’s as if Cairo is under siege.”

But there was another really peculiar feature that day.  Why were the only protesters I saw a dozen foreigners outside the gates of the University, who sounded American?  They appeared rather tired and bored.  I didn’t get the sense their heart was in it.  One message of the speech was to face tensions squarely and with candour.  To speak clearly and plainly.  It is certainly an extraordinary day when the presence of the President of the US, however charismatic and popular he may be, draws no crowd protesting enthusiastically.  

  • Share this with:
Comments:

Hi Dom...It seems to me that everybody is trying a new approach, or better, a different one. Might prove useful but I do believe that the battle for the hearts and minds is taking a new shape. Nothing is wrong with that but maybe a more subtle way of looking at it might indicate that an action is required by both Muslims and the West. Personally, I don’t think that the coming years would see a drastic change but it is worth it. Words are not going to counter what the tanks did to a certain type of minds. The sugar-coated realism of Obama needs consistent actions and a sustained methodology. If I were you, I would start devising means, factual ones, to re-engage and remedy what has been done or perceived to be.

Posted by Ahmed Reda on June 15, 2009 at 01:58 PM BST #

Hello. Very nice blog. How true. And isn't it a pity how the media in each country portrays to the public its own point of view, flooding them with preconceptions and deeply affecting how people view other cultures and religions? Ahmed

Posted by Ahmed Hawas on June 15, 2009 at 10:33 PM BST #

"My first thought about someone is not to say “Oh, she’s a Muslim” that is a wise view of point I like it

Posted by Dalia on June 21, 2009 at 09:28 AM BST #

Yes, actions will determine whether people believe that the words are sincere. That is why we are always working up practical projects, particularly on education and training. And "we" is more than just the Embassy - it includes all those working on building understanding between Egypt and Britain. But changing the way we talk to each other and about our different points of view is also essential. Unless people believe you respect them, they won't want to partner you in a project. And I agree, that is why the media are so important: the problem is that violence sells. The same seems to be true of contemporary films, where the audience seems to desire revenge rather than forgiveness.

Posted by Dominic Asquith on June 25, 2009 at 11:26 AM BST #

Post a Comment:
  • HTML Syntax: NOT allowed

Calendar

Search

Feeds

Tag cloud

Blogroll