This snapshot, taken on
17/06/2009
, shows web content acquired for preservation by The National Archives. External links, forms and search may not work in archived websites and contact details are likely to be out of date.
 
 
The UK Government Web Archive does not use cookies but some may be left in your browser from archived websites.

News

   

NEWS RELEASE

Ref: 22/09
Date: 3 February 2009

Nobel House, 17 Smith Square, London SW1P 3JR
Out of hours telephone 020 7270 8960

Government response to Anderson Review of 2007 Foot and Mouth Outbreak

The Government has accepted all 26 of the main recommendations made by Sir Iain Anderson on the response to the 2007 outbreak of Foot and Mouth Disease (FMD), Environment Secretary Hilary Benn announced today.

Mr Benn has published the Government’s response to Sir Iain’s review, which found that ‘in analysing how the 2007 outbreak was handled, with its innumerable, interwoven decisions and actions, we found much to applaud, along with some deficiencies. On balance, the positive easily outweighs the negative.”

Sir Iain’s 26 recommendations focussed on eight main lessons:

  • Maintain vigilance;
  • Be prepared;
  • React with speed and certainty;
  • Explain policies, plans and practices;
  • Respect local knowledge;
  • Risk assessment and cost benefit analysis;
  • Data and information management systems;
  • Base decisions on best available science.

Publishing the Government’s response to Sir Iain’s review, Mr Benn said:

“I am grateful to Sir Iain for his review and for his recognition of how Government and the livestock industry tackled the outbreak together. However, even though most aspects were handled well, I acknowledge that there are always lessons to learn and ways we can do better.

“Our response to Sir Iain’s review contains a range of actions, commitments and decisions, some of which have already been implemented and some of which are still in progress.

“Since 2007, we have dealt with other exotic diseases, and have applied what we have learned through dealing with Foot and Mouth Disease. As a result we are now better prepared.  I am committed to continuing to work with the industry to ensure that we are as prepared as possible for future events.”

In addition to accepting the recommendations in the main body of the report, the Government’s response comments on Sir Iain’s personal recommendation to reposition the Institute for Animal Health (IAH), based at Pirbright, as a new national Institute of Infectious Diseases. The Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC) will continue to fund the Institute for Animal Health so that it can provide world class research facilities that strengthen both livestock industries and our food security. DIUS expects the BBSRC to submit a business case soon for the redevelopment of the Pirbright site.

The Government’s full response to Sir Iain’s review is available at:

 

Notes for editors

1.         Sir Iain Anderson was asked by the Government to chair a review of the Government's reaction to the 2007 Foot and Mouth Disease Outbreak. Sir Iain conducted an inquiry into the 2001 outbreak, and was asked to review his lessons drawn from the 2001 outbreak and identify any others arising from the current outbreak.

End

Public enquiries: 08459 335577
News releases available on our website:
www.defra.gov.uk
Defra's aim is sustainable development

Page published: 3 February 2009

Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs