This snapshot taken on 05/03/2008, shows web content selected for preservation by The National Archives. External links, forms and search boxes may not work in archived websites.

Alan Johnson MP

FABIAN SOCIETY PAMPHLET LAUNCH - "RAISING LAZARUS: THE FUTURE OF ORGANISED LABOUR"

Alan Johnson MP

LONDON


Wednesday, December 7, 2005


Other speeches
    (Click picture for biography)
CHECK AGAINST DELIVERY

This is an excellent pamphlet that makes a vital contribution to an important debate.

The first step to resolving a problem is recognising that it exists. This report provides a thorough diagnosis of the challenges facing the union movement.

I agree with many of the points that David makes in his detailed yet readable analysis. He displays the astute judgement that I grew to respect when he was a senior official at the TUC.

Like Government, Unions have to recognise that the world is going through the most profound change, with significant effects - economically, socially and demographically.

In Asia - unprecedented rates of growth. In our universities - unprecedented technological advances. In our society - huge demographic change with a falling birthrate and an aging population.

We have to face up to the implications and challenges of this changing world and help the people we represent to adapt and prosper.

There are three areas where I think the Trade Union movement needs to reform.

First it needs to move on from the “male, pale and stale” stereotype of trade unionists, towards a trade union base that represents a mix of people, and properly reflects today’s diverse workforce. It’s a welcome and important development that for the first time the majority of union members are women.

Our movement needs to reflect the issues and concerns of that changing membership. They want help balancing the pressure of modern life and equipping themselves with the skills and training they need to succeed.

The Warwick agreement is a big agenda that matters to millions of people who will benefit from our commitments on bank holidays, family friendly policies and the need to concentrate attention on the most exploited and vulnerable workers.

We will bring all of this together by laying out our Labour Market Strategy for this parliament in a paper that we’ll publish early next year.

Second, an old style focus on “struggle, strikes and strife” as David puts it in his pamphlet, can turn off those employees who don’t want to be at war with their employer but do want to understand their rights and obligations in the modern workplace.

Unions should be the enthusiastic champions of the new Information and Consultation legislation. It is an opportunity to work with employers constructively and build up trust through co-operation. An opportunity to carve out a new role and demonstrate their value as the collective voice of the workforce.

To help we’ve introduced the Union Modernisation Fund which aims to help unions to meet the challenges of changing labour markets. We see I&C as an integral part of this picture. Collaborative working is part of modern, high performance workplaces.

There will be no return to the days of non-ballotted strike action or the closed shop. Workers will no longer accept that rights at work only come with a union card.

This Government is delivering basic, decent minimum standards in the workplace for all workers whether unionised or not. From the National Minimum Wage to the right to request flexible working – these will change Britain’s employment landscape forever.

Finally, Unions need to extend their reach into new areas, new sectors, industries and companies. Not only to stem downward trends in membership but also to ensure they are delivering help to the most vulnerable.

Today we have a common purpose in making sure that the rights we have introduced are properly enforced. Making sure, together, we tackle exploitation and abuse in the kind of sectors that don’t normally appear on the radar - the hidden parts of British industry, where some of the most vulnerable members of our society work.

Changes in union structures that reflect changes in industry can only be welcomed. I led a union through a merger myself, but the number of unions is not the key issue. What matters is the overall size of Trade Union membership.

Let me close by congratulating David on his report. These are difficult issues. But, as the report says, it’s time we opened the “too difficult to think about” box.


Top of page
 
Back to index