Justification of an Air Quality Standard for Ozone
- The Panel accept the clear evidence from the medical
literature that ozone has irritant effects on the lungs,
resulting in certain circumstances in cough or discomfort
on deep breathing. In experimental and epidemiological
studies there is evidence that inflammation of the inner
surface lining of the lung's airways and impairment of
ventilatory capacity may occur on exposure to
concentrations of ozone higher than about 100 ppb,
usually for several hours. Smaller effects can be
detected in individuals undertaking intermittent exercise
at concentrations of about 80 ppb over periods of 6.6
hours. There is, however, no evidence to date that such
effects cause any long term damage to the airways or
contribute to chronic lung disease at the levels of ozone
likely to occur in the United Kingdom.
- The Panel recognise that the main factors determining
rises in tropospheric ozone concentrations are the
coincidence of sunlight and traffic pollution, and that
the highest levels of ozone are likely to be encountered
some distance downwind of the source of precursor
pollutants. This means that excursions of ozone
concentrations above a Standard may occur in
circumstances outside the complete control of any one
nation. Moreover, such excursions may occur purely as a
consequence of the natural phenomenon of stratospheric
air penetrating to the troposphere, and during the months
of October to March such natural increases in ozone
concentrations may occur. Thus any health-based Standard
set may be expected to be exceeded from time to time, and
will be exceeded more frequently in the south of the UK than
in the north and in rural areas rather than in towns.
- The Panel have decided to recommend an Air Quality
Standard for ozone in terms of a concentration with a
specified averaging time. We have chosen a level of 50
ppb - appreciably lower than the concentration at which
effects have been detected experimentally, in order to
include a margin of safety. The Panel recommend that the
50 ppb level be measured as a running 8-hour average,
since this most closely represents the exposures likely
to be harmful to human health. This recommendation should
not be taken to imply that ozone concentrations vary only
slowly, indeed the opposite is often the case, with
variations between consecutive hourly means of up to a
factor of two being recorded. For each day there will be
a continuous eight hour period for which the mean
concentration is higher than for any other similarly
continuous period. The World Health Organisation (WHO)
chose a fixed set of 8-hour periods, 00.00 -7.59, 08.00
-15.59 and 16.00 -23.59, so clearly peak concentrations
recorded on this basis will be slightly lower than those
on the running average basis for a given ozone exposure.
The 50 ppb maximum 8-hour running average employed here
Is equivalent to 37- 48 ppb on the rigid and arbitrary
definition of averaging periods used by WHO. The WHO
equivalent value appears as a range because of the
variability of ozone concentrations both between sites
and at the same site on different days.
- Our examination of levels of ozone recorded in the United Kingdom
leads us to recognise that the Standard may be exceeded (Figure
7) and that when this occurs 8-hour ozone concentrations may be
considerably greater than 50 ppb. The highest 8-hour concentration
recorded in a year has been shown (Figure
8) to increase with the number of times that the recommended Standard
(50 ppb, running 8-hour average concentration) is exceeded. We note
that if the recommended Standard is exceeded on less than 10 days
per year, at any one site, one would not expect, in most years, the
highest 8-hour concentration to exceed 100 ppb (Figure
8).
- Present ozone concentrations show exceedences of a running 8-hour
average of 50 ppb at some sites in the order of 80 days per year (Figure
7), and, in recommending such a Standard, the Panel recognise
that its achievement will require continued determined action to reduce
the major sources of primary pollutants in the United Kingdom and
the rest of Europe.
[ Previous ] [ Contents
] [ Next ]
Published 29 October 1998
Expert Panel on Air Quality Standards
Index
Air and Environmental Quality Index
Defra Home Page
|