The Effects of 1,3-Butadiene on Human Health
- Evidence of the hazard of 1,3-butadiene comes from
two main sources: firstly, studies of human populations
exposed in the workplace and, secondly, from
investigations carried out in laboratory rats, mice and
monkeys. The Panel put greatest weight on data derived
directly from human studies; however, compared with
benzene, fewer human data are available and greater
emphasis has had to be placed on results from laboratory
investigations. The animal data are consistent in showing
1,3-butadiene to be a potent carcinogen and to act,
through another chemical to which it is converted in the
body, on the genetic material of cells as a genotoxic
carcinogen.
- The Panel recognise that extrapolation from the
results of animal experiments to effects in man is
difficult and involves uncertainties. There are also
difficulties in extrapolating from studies of workers
exposed in the past to the general population of today.
The levels to which workers may be exposed are very much
higher than those in ambient air; for example, a worker
could be exposed intermittently to levels of up to 10,000
ppb (the United Kingdom workplace maximum exposure limit)
compared with an hourly average of about 20 ppb during a
severe short-term atmospheric pollution episode in a
city. There is no feasible study in man which will show a
measurable effect on health of the relatively low levels
occurring in the general atmosphere.
- The data on absorption, distribution, metabolism
(that is, biological and/or chemical breakdown) and
elimination of 1,3-butadiene in humans are limited but
some information is available from laboratory studies on
animals and it is possible to draw some general
conclusions. Inhalation studies have indicated that
1,3-butadiene is absorbed through the lungs and can be
detected in all tissues which have been examined. Studies
comparing uptake in mice, rats and monkeys have shown
uptake to be greatest in mice and least in monkeys.
1,3-Butadiene and the main chemical to which it is
converted in the body, an epoxide (1,2-epoxybut-3-ene),
are eliminated in exhaled air of mice and rats.
- The metabolism of 1,3-butadiene has been studied in
several animal species, and also in tissues derived from
them. Differences exist between species and the formation
of the dangerous chemicals to which it is converted
(epoxides) is most rapid in mice. Laboratory studies have
shown that human tissues can produce epoxide metabolites;
however, at low doses, the relative capacity of tissues
from different species to metabolise 1,3-butadiene is
unknown.
- Short-term human exposures to very high
concentrations (several million ppb) of 1,3-butadiene,
including experimentation on volunteers conducted in the
1940s before its carcinogenic potential was suspected,
have caused irritation of the eyes, nose, throat and
skin. Investigations of workers in Eastern Europe exposed
occupationally to high concentrations of 1,3-butadiene
have shown them to have been at risk of a variety of
disorders, including diseases of the blood and nervous
system. These studies did not take account of other
possible harmful factors. The general public in the
United Kingdom would be exposed to much lower
concentrations, although for longer periods.
- The effect of long-term exposure which is of most
concern is the induction of cancers of the lymphoid
system and blood-forming tissues, lymphomas and
leukaemias. An increase in the risks of developing these
types of cancers has been reported in groups of workers
in the United States from the 1,3-butadiene manufacturing
industry and from the styrene-butadiene rubber
manufacturing industry. Exposures of rats and mice to
high inhaled concentrations of 1,3-butadiene for all or
most of their lifetimes have shown similar effects, as
well as an increased mortality from other types of
malignant disease. Species differences in susceptibility
to the development of malignant disease have been
demonstrated; mice, particularly females, are sensitive
to the carcinogenic effects of 1,3-butadiene with an
increase in tumours being noted after long duration
exposure to levels of, and in excess of, 6,250 ppb. This
increased susceptibility may, in part, be due to the
differences in uptake and metabolism of 1,3-butadiene in
mice as compared with other animals which were noted
previously.
- Various laboratory studies examining the mode of
action of 1,3-butadiene and some of its metabolites have
been carried out. 1,3-Butadiene damages the genetic
material of cells in various ways and these genotoxic
effects indicate that it may cause malignant disease
after very small exposures. The Panel have taken the
view, as with benzene, that while this could be strictly
interpreted as meaning that there is no safe level to
which people can be exposed, a more realistic view is
that the risks become progressively smaller as the
cumulative exposure of an individual is reduced and that
there is a level at which increased risks attributable to
1,3-butadiene are exceedingly small and unlikely to be
detectable by any practicable method.
- Further problems in extrapolating risk from groups of
industrial workers to the general population relate to
the size and make-up of the industrial group studied. In
the work reported in the medical literature, the
industrial groups (often called 'cohorts', that is
defined groups of workers followed forward over time in
order to estimate their risks of death from various
diseases) have ranged in size from about 2,500 - 12,000.
Lymphomas and leukaemias are relatively uncommon in the
general population of the United Kingdom, occurring in
about 1 person in 2,800, and it is often difficult (on
present knowledge) to exclude the possibility that small
excesses of cases are chance occurrences. Thus, the
smaller the cohort, the greater the disease-causing
effect has to be in order for it to be detected. However,
in one of the cohorts the exposure histories of workers
who had died of lymphoma or leukaemia were compared with
those of control workers without these diseases, matched
for factors such as age, year of employment and factory.
The results showed those who had died of lymphoma or
leukaemia to have had a substantially greater
occupational exposure to 1,3-butadiene than had the
control workers.
- An important point the Panel have considered in
recommending a Standard concerns the differences between
past industrial cohorts and the general population. The
former generally comprised fit males, young and
middle-aged, whereas the general population also includes
children, pregnant women, the elderly and the sick, some
of whom may be particularly sensitive to toxic chemicals.
Industrial workers are potentially exposed to relatively
high concentrations for perhaps 8 hours per day, five
days weekly for 40 years, whereas the general population
is exposed to much lower concentrations, but throughout
their lifetimes.
- The Panel have examined published reports of studies
of lymphomas and leukaemias in groups of workers exposed
to 1,3-butadiene. None of these provided information on
measured exposures of workers who had died from these
cancers; however, attempts have been made to categorise
workers' exposure using job description data (see
Table 2). Exposure data for people currently exposed
to 1,3-butadiene and doing jobs having the same job
description as those identified as being at particular
risk from 1,3-butadiene were also available (see
Table 3). Current exposures in these jobs are likely
to be lower than in the past owing to changes in work
practices and improved controls. For example, the
American Conference of Governmental Industrial
Hygienists' threshold limit value3
for exposure to 1,3-butadiene over an 8-hour working day
in a 40-hour working week was, until 1984, 1,000,000 ppb
(as a time-weighted average), as compared with the
present value of 10,000 ppb and a proposal that it should
be further reduced to 2,000 ppb. Assuming that the job
description applied to the same type of work being done
now as formerly and given that current workplace levels
are lower than in the past, thus providing an inbuilt
safety factor, the Panel used the current exposure data
to obtain a level of exposure for the groups of workers
identified as probably not having been at increased risk
of developing these cancers. Consideration of these data
led the Panel to conclude that it was unlikely that an
excess risk of lymphomas or leukaemias would be
detectable at exposures below about 1,000 ppb. We note,
however, the relative weakness of the available
information on human exposures, even compared with that
available for benzene, and therefore acknowledge the
uncertainty surrounding this figure.
Table 2 Summary of recent
1,3-butadiene epidemiological studies
|
Authors
|
Study
|
Number of subjects
|
Cancer type*
|
Number of deaths
|
SMR**
|
95%CIý
|
|
Downs, Crane & Kim 1987 updated by Divine
1990
|
1,3-Butadiene production plant, Port Neches,
Texas process workers 1943-1979 (cohort study)
|
2582
|
Lymphatic and haematopoietic
|
25
|
130
|
84-192
|
|
(Lymphosarcoma and reticulosarcoma)
|
(9)
|
(229)
|
(104-435)
|
|
Meinhardt et al. 1982
|
Styrene-butadiene rubber facility, Port Neches,
Texas, production workers, Plant A, 1943-1976
(cohort study)
|
1662
|
Lymphatic and haematopoietic
|
9
|
155
|
71-295
|
|
(leukaemia, aleukaemia)
|
(5)
|
(203)
|
(66-472)
|
|
All deaths occurred in men first employed
between 1943 and 1945 after which the process
changed from batch to continuous feed operation
|
|
Meinhardt et al. 1982
|
Styrene-butadiene rubber facility, Port Neches,
Texas, production workers, Plant B, 1950-1976
(cohort study)
|
1094
|
Lymphatic and haematopoietic
|
2
|
78
|
10-283
|
|
(leukaemia, aleukaemia)
|
(1)
|
(101)
|
(3-563)
|
|
Matanoski, Santos-Burgoa & Schwartz 1990
|
Styrene-butadiene rubber facilities, United
States and Canada, 1943-1982 (cohort study)
|
|
|
production workers:
|
3124
|
All lymphopoietic (other lymphatic)
|
19
(9)
|
146
(260)
|
88-227
(119-494)
|
|
maintenance workers:
|
3271
|
14
(2)
|
75
(39)
|
41-126
(5-141)
|
|
utility workers:
|
457
|
5
(2)
|
203
(313)
|
66-474
(62-695)
|
|
others:
|
2867
|
12
(2)
|
87
(54)
|
45-152
(7-196)
|
|
Cowles et al. 1994
|
1,3-Butadiene production plant, Deer Park
Manufacturing Complex, interrupted production;
production workers, 1948-1989 (cohort study)
|
614
|
Lymphatic and haematopoietic
|
0
|
-
|
-
|
|
Authors
|
Study
|
Number of subjects
|
Cancer type*
|
Number of deaths
|
OR**Ý
|
95%CIý
|
|
Santos-Burgoa et al. 1992
|
Styrene-butadiene rubber facilities, United
States and Canada, 1943-1982 (nested case-referent
study)
|
59 cases matched with 193 controls
|
All lymphohaematopoietic
|
59
|
2.12
|
0.86-5.18
|
|
(leukaemia)
|
(26)
|
(7.39)
|
(1.32-41.3)
|
|
* Despite the diversity of terms listed here all
of them refer to different categories of lymphomas
and/or leukaemias. The descriptions and figures in
parentheses represent sub-groups of the main
category.
** SMR: Standardised Mortality Ratio, the ratio
of the observed number of deaths in the
occupationally exposed cohort to the expected
number of deaths in a control group of this size of
unexposed persons multiplied by 100. For control
groups the studies have used either the national
populations or workers in other industries.
Ý OR: Odds Ratio, the odds in favour of
exposure amongst cases to the odds in favour of
exposure amongst controls. Values above 1.0
indicate a greater risk of exposure to
1,3-butadiene in the cases.
ý CI: Confidence Interval, the 95% CI is
the range in which, allowing for variability in
study populations, there is a 95% chance of the
true result falling. If, in the Table, the value
100 is not included in the 95% CI shown for the SMR
then there is only a 1 in 40 chance that the
increase in leukaemia/lymphoma deaths is an
erroneous result (p < 0.025). Similarly,
if the value 1.0 is not included in the 95% CI
shown for the OR then there is only a 1 in 40
chance that the greater exposure of the cases is an
erroneous result.
|
Table 3 Exposure profiles (1990)
of U.S. workers in 1,3-butadiene production identified in
the epidemiological studies as not being at increased risk
of developing lymphomas or leukaemias*
|
Industry
|
Worker category
|
Percentage exposed to:
|
|
<1000 ppb
|
<2000 ppb
|
<5000 ppb
|
|
Crude 1,3-butadiene production
|
Maintenance
|
85%
|
91%
|
96%
|
|
1,3-Butadiene monomer production
|
Maintenance
|
85%
|
91%
|
96%
|
|
1,3-Butadiene polymer + other
|
Maintenance
|
85%
|
91%
|
96%
|
|
|
Utilities
|
93%
|
96%
|
100%
|
|
* Compiled from Department of Labor,
Occupational Safety and Health Administration,
1990.
|
3
The threshold limit value is the concentration to
which it is believed that nearly all workers may be
repeatedly exposed under the defined conditions without
adverse health effects. It is not intended for use outside
the industrial workplace.
[ Previous ] [ Contents
] [ Next ]
Published 29 October 1998
Expert Panel on Air Quality Standards
Index
Air and Environmental Quality Index
Defra Home Page
|