UK Trade and
Investment
The UK is an open economy. More than many countries,
our living standards and the competitiveness of our industry
depend on our ability to trade and invest freely.
·
We are the world’s sixth largest exporter of goods (£ 188 billion
in 2003) and second largest exporter of services (£ 88 billion
in 2003). Charts 1-3 below show the trend in the value of UK trade
since 1990, the main locations the UK trades with and the principle
goods and services traded by the UK.
·
Exports are equivalent to more than one-quarter of GDP
·
We have the highest ratio of inward and outward investment to GDP
of any leading economy
As an open economy we benefit from a liberalised
world trade system. It is in our interests that the achievements
from past liberalisation are not lost and that the momentum
of liberalisation is maintained.
Trade and Investment: how the UK benefits
Maximising the opportunities for international trade is in our
best economic interests. Trade allows countries, and the firms
and individuals within them, to specialise in economic activities
which best allow them to exploit their relative strengths, abilities,
resources and expertise, and to buy from and sell to other countries
doing likewise. In this way trade:
·
Means lower prices and wider choice for consumers.
·
Benefits industry through better access to competitive sources of
components and materials, boosting their performance at home
and abroad.
·
Stimulates competition and innovation, and provides a conduit for
the transmission of ideas, know-how and technology across borders.
·
Promotes economic growth in developed and less developed economies,
and helps generate the resources to promote higher standards
of employment and environmental protection.
·
Helps underpin political stability throughout the world.
Gains from liberalisation
Trade has brought real benefits in the post-war
era. The world’s politicians agreed to establish the GATT and
work for trade liberalisation after witnessing the damaging
and tragic effects of widespread protection during the 1930s.
Since then, average industrial tariffs of developed
countries have fallen from nearly 40% to less than 5% through
eight rounds of multilateral trade liberalisation. This has
gone hand-in-hand with a more than twenty-fold increase in world
trade and a more than six-fold increase in world incomes. A
more liberal investment environment has facilitated increased
overseas investment. By 2002 the world stock of foreign direct
investment was equivalent to 22% of world GDP compared with
6% in 1982.
Although there is no simple formula for economic
success, and trade liberalisation alone is no panacea, over
the past thirty years those countries with the highest levels
of integration in the world economy have achieved the fastest
growth in living standards.
There is significant scope for further gains.
In OECD countries tariffs higher than 15% remain in sectors
such as clothing textiles, footwear and motor vehicles. In non-OECD
countries tariffs in excess of 15% typically cover as much as
three quarters of tariff lines. A number of estimates have been
made of the potential impact of further trade liberalisation.
They are not directly comparable because of differences in assumptions
made and methods of estimation. A 1999 study published by the
European Commission concluded that an ambitious package of liberalisation
could boost world prosperity by nearly $400bn pa.
Protection is costlyThe folly of protection
has been confirmed by a range of studies from around the world.
These indicate that that it has brought few benefits but imposed
substantial costs. Protection has proved an ineffective means
of sustaining employment. Trade barriers in the form of tariffs
distort domestic markets, pushing up the prices faced by consumers
and insulating inefficient sectors from competition. They penalise
foreign producers and encourage the inefficient allocation of
resources both domestically and globally. There are no rich
closed economies.
Developing Countries & TradeTrade doesn’t just benefit
UK. Developing countries also have much to gain. The available
evidence suggests that open economies have faster growth rates
than closed economies. Although the precise figures obtained
from studies may be open to challenge, there is no evidence
to suggest that closed economies grow faster than open ones.
Gains for developing countries do not come solely
through improved access for their exports. Liberalisation by
developing countries themselves is just as, if not more, important.
Competitive domestic markets are a necessary condition for improving
their rate of growth.
Trade liberalisation does not automatically imply
higher growth. It will have little benefit if the domestic policy
environment is inadequate. Weak economies need to build simultaneously
the institutional and human infrastructure to take advantage
of trade opportunities. Hence, the need for a coherent approach
amongst the international organisations to best enable them
to do that.
Developing countries have much to gain from further
liberalisation. On average manufacturing exports from developing
countries to developed countries face an effective tariff 4
times higher than that on exports between developed countries.
They would also gain from lower tariffs on trade between themselves,
which are currently far higher than those in developed countries.
In a study published by the EU Commission, of the $400 billion
gains from liberalisation, developing countries would gain $140bn
a year; more than the EU ($92bn) and the US ($45bn).
Research shows that trade liberalisation generally
helps to alleviate poverty. Trade openness can have beneficial
effects on productivity, the adoption and use of new technology
and investment. It is through these channels that trade stimulates
economic growth and provides the resources necessary for reducing
poverty. If poverty increases after trade liberalisation, it
is because of failures in the domestic market and the best policy
is to correct those. The virtue of trade liberalisation is as
part of a package of measures to strengthen markets - promoting
greater use of the market, more stable and less arbitrary policy
intervention, stronger competition and macro-economic stability.
Studies acknowledge that some can lose in the short run from
liberalisation. The plight of the losers should not be ignored,
but the right way to alleviate their hardship is through social
safety nets and job retraining rather than abandoning reforms
that benefit most people.
Annex
Chart 1, UK Exports and Imports between 1990
and 2003

Chart
2, Main UK trading (exports and imports) partners in 2003

Chart
3, Principle UK exports and imports in 2003

Source:
National
Statistics
Contact:
Chris Alexander
Tel: 44 (0)20 7215 4225
Fax: 44 (0)20 7215 4520
E-mail: chris.alexander@dti.gsi.gov.uk
Last
revised on 29 April 2004