|
SCIENCE
AND INNOVATION STRATEGY 2001
Contents
Complete
document (131Kb)
DTI Science and
Innovation Strategy
Annex A: "Promoting
enterprise, innovation and increased Productivity"
Annex B: "Making
the most of the UK's science, engineering and technology"
Annex C: "Developing
strong, competitive markets within a regulatory framework which
promotes fairness and sustainability"
Annex D: White
Paper commitments for science and innovation
Annex E: The
place of science and innovation in the UK
Annex F: Departmental
issues affecting science and innovation policy
Tables on DTI
science, engineering and technology expenditure

DTI
Science and Innovation Strategy 2001
1.1 The Department of Trade and Industry's
high-level objectives are fundamental to its strategy for science
and innovation. The majority of DTI's science, engineering and
technology (SET) expenditure (see Figure 1)
is devoted to (a) funding the UK's science and engineering base
and (b) supporting the development and use of science and technology
in industry, for the benefit of the economy as a whole. Unlike
other Departments, the DTI devotes only a relatively small proportion
of its total SET expenditure to scientific R&D in support of statutory,
regulatory or policy obligations. The Department also promotes
innovation and enterprise in a broader sense, although this strategy
focuses on DTI support for science and technological innovation.
(1)
1.2 The DTI's strategy towards science
and innovation has been taken a major step forward through policy
commitments and initiatives made in two recent White Papers (2),
which are being monitored through published implementation plans.
The DTI's Science and Innovation White Paper (3),
published last year, set a framework for the Government's role
as the key investor in the science base; the facilitator for collaboration
between universities and business; and the regulator for innovation,
including the promotion of public confidence in science. The recent
White Paper on Enterprise, Skills and Innovation (4)
emphasised the importance of science and innovation to regional
(and national) economic growth, with the need to raise skills
as a key issue; again a number of initiatives were announced to
invest in innovation and new technologies, including e-business;
and foster an environment for enterprise.
The DTI aim, objectives
and science and innovation priorities
| 1.3 The DTI's overall aim is
to increase competitiveness and scientific excellence in order
to generate higher levels of sustainable growth and productivity
in a modern economy. |
1.4 To achieve this, the Department
has four high-level objectives (5), three of
which are key to taking forward the DTI's science and innovation
strategy, according to the priorities set out here. Many of these
priorities cut across all three objectives, since there are common
challenges to building strong science and innovation in the UK:
the importance of investment in the science base and new technologies;
the need to translate this through exploitation and business innovation;
and to make sure that this is underpinned by a strong and transparent
framework. Details on the Department's activities to take forward
these priorities are set out in Annexes A-C.

| Objective I: To promote enterprise,
innovation and increased productivity: |
DTI strategic science and innovation
priorities are to:
- Promote awareness of innovation
and create a favourable business climate for businesses
to innovate in the UK;
- Encourage business innovation,
particularly by facilitating collaboration and exploitation
of research, with an emphasis on regional growth;
- Encourage the adoption of technology
and business best practice, both domestically and
internationally, to improve the way companies develop new
products, processes, services and markets.
- Support the development of new
technologies for growth industries of the future.
Activities are tailored towards specific
needs within individual industry sectors, regions, and at a national
level. Particular attention is paid to addressing regional priorities
and facilitating regional networks, working in partnership with
Regional Development Agencies, the Small Business Service and
Government Offices, as well as taking into account the needs of
small business.
| Objective II: To make the
most of the UK's science, engineering and technology: |
DTI strategic science and innovation
priorities are to:
- Invest in the science base
to reverse years of decline, particularly:
- investing in the science
research infrastructure;
- funding basic SET research
that advances knowledge for its own sake, playing to the
UK's strengths and for the UK's long-term interest, and
is also sufficiently flexible for future science and technology
options;
- increasing the pool of talented
people trained by and working in the science and
engineering base, while raising skills and increasing expertise.
- Create incentives and build capacity
for knowledge transfer to maximise the contribution of
the science and engineering base to economic development and
quality of life.
Activities are focused towards the
Government's role as the lead investor in scientific infrastructure,
basic scientific research and the education and skills which influence
the strength of the science base. Collaboration between higher
education institutes and business is also a priority, to ensure
that scientific advances are fully exploited. As in objective
1, there is a strong emphasis on the importance of science, engineering
and technology to regional growth and on ensuring that the framework
is in place for scientists and businesses to make international
links.

| Objective III: To develop
strong, competitive markets within a regulatory framework
which promotes fairness and sustainability: |
DTI strategic science and innovation
priorities are to:
- Build public confidence in
science by ensuring the Department's legal and regulatory
work follows the Guidelines (6)
on the use of scientific advice in policy-making;
- Administer Intellectual Property
Rights to ensure that national, European and international
systems encourage innovation and competition;
- Create an infrastructure for
information and communication technologies which gives all
firms and individuals convenient and economical access to broadband
services, to foster the growth of e-business and an integrated
networked society;
- Promote the development and deployment
of safe and sustainable energy technologies;
- Maintain the UK's National
Measurement System and ensure that it meets the needs of
UK trade, industry, innovation and public policy;
- Support the development of technical
standards for products, services and quality management,
which underpin regulation and which remove technical barriers
to trade;
- Access existing evidence
and procure new research where necessary to improve the Department's
understanding of the impact or potential impact of DTI regulatory
activity on individuals (e.g. consumers), businesses and the
economy as a whole.
These priorities relate to the regulatory
framework which is needed to underpin science and innovation,
so that firms and the economy can benefit from technological developments,
and to ensure that there is public confidence in science.
1.5 In undertaking activities to
take forward these priorities, the Department will focus on:
- customer-oriented delivery;
- outcomes, and meeting clear targets;
- and value for money.
These activities will not be taken
in isolation: international developments in science, technology,
markets and industrial and economic policy will be taken into
account.
1.6 The DTI strategy will be used
to ensure that the targets and priorities for science and innovation
are met, to help deliver DTI objectives, with the ultimate objective
of higher productivity and economic growth.
1.7 The Department's priorities and
support for science and innovation are currently being reviewed
through two DTI reviews announced by the Secretary of State in
June 2001 (DTI's priorities and structure review and DTI business
support review).
Department of Trade and Industry
August 2001

Annex
A - "Promoting Enterprise, Innovation and Increased Productivity"
Introduction
1.1 Scientific and technological
innovation is vital to the future competitiveness of many industrial
sectors in the UK. There is a continual need for companies to
adapt and change to meet competitive pressures in an increasingly
global market. To do so companies need to be innovative in the
way they supply and develop markets, manage their business, become
more resource efficient, and produce products and services.
1.2 Many of DTI's activities affect
innovation in one way or another. While the wider policy and regulatory
environment has a huge impact on the climate for and promotion
of innovation and growth, this strategy focuses on support for
science and technological innovation, and here, business innovation.
Similarly, some aspects of innovation lie within the responsibility
of other Departments, for example the R&D tax credit for small
firms, and the importance of macro-economic stability to encourage
businesses to innovate.
Current objectives
for supporting business innovation
1.3 DTI's key strategic science and
innovation priorities are to:
- Promote awareness of innovation
and create a favourable business climate for businesses
to innovate in the UK;
- Encourage business innovation,
particularly by facilitating collaboration and exploitation
of research, with an emphasis on regional growth;
- Encourage the adoption of technology
and business best practice, both domestically and
internationally, to improve the way companies develop new
products, processes, services and markets;
- Support the development of new
technologies for growth industries of the future.
1.4 While the main thrust of the
Department's expenditure for business innovation is directed at
the first of the DTI objectives i.e. "to promote enterprise, innovation
and increased productivity", it is not exclusive to it and makes
a contribution across the other Departmental objectives. Many
activities are closely linked with work to promote the exploitation
of science and pull through the work of the science base into
industry (see Annex B). This includes supporting
new technologies for use in industries of the future, for example,
genomics, basic technologies (nanotechnology, sensors, quantum
computing), biotechnology, e-science and e-business, green technologies,
aerospace and space (again, some of these, such as the communications
infrastructure and green technologies are fundamental to the DTI's
third objective, at Annex C). The Department
works closely with other key sectors, such as cars and chemicals,
where the adoption of new and existing technologies and best practice
can help companies to compete and grow.
1.5 A technical, legal and design
infrastructure is maintained - including the Patent Office, the
National Measurement System, support for the setting of technical
standards, and the Design Council - which underpins business confidence
in innovation (see Annex C). These regulatory
functions are in fact fundamental to promoting innovation. The
system of intellectual property (IP) law, for example, exists
to stimulate innovation, enterprise and competition. As well as
keeping this purpose at the centre of IP policy formulation, the
Patent Office seeks to ensure that the availability of IP rights
provides the maximum stimulus to UK innovation in practice. This
is done through measures intended to make it as easy as possible
to register and enforce rights, and by increasing awareness and
understanding of IP in society.

How objectives
are met
1.6 DTI activities in support of
these objectives are tailored towards specific needs, either at
a national level, or within individual sectors or regions. There
is a strong emphasis on activities to address regional issues,
the needs of SMEs and on improving skills. The Enterprise, Skills
and Innovation White Paper (7) set out a new
approach to regional policy to help all regions to respond to
change through innovation and enterprise. It also emphasised the
need to close the skills gap, particularly in IT and technical
skills, and to ensure that all businesses, both large and small,
have access to technology and are encouraged to innovate. The
Department works closely with other Departments in taking forward
these objectives, in particular the Department for Transport,
Local Government and the Regions (DTLR), the Department for Education
and Skills (DfES) and the Department for Environment, Food and
Rural Affairs (DEFRA).
1.7 In April 2000, DTI established
the Small Business Service (SBS) to be the focus for the provision
of business support to SMEs. In England, Regional Development
Agencies (RDAs) have been set up and have been developing regional
innovation strategies. In June 2001, the DTI took over sponsorship
responsibility for the RDAs from the then Department of Transport,
Environment and the Regions. Within DTI, the Business Competitiveness
Group is responsible for delivering innovation support to business,
working in partnership with these new bodies, to provide support
in a way which addresses customer needs. This also involves working
closely with the Office of Science and Technology on activities
to encourage knowledge transfer from the science base to industry,
as set out in Annex B.
1.8 The DTI is also setting up cross-functional
teams with a broad membership drawn from within and outside the
Department, including the regions, to pilot new ways of identifying
and tackling barriers to growth. These teams will target practical
and measurable improvements in long-term performance against international
competitors - using indicators like growth, market share, and
intensity of innovation.
1.9 From April 2001, the Department
is adopting a more consistent breakdown of activities within the
Business Competitiveness Group's budgets along the following lines:
(i) Industrial exploitation of
science (through knowledge transfer, collaborative R&D and
technology demonstration);
(ii) Support for competitiveness (including best practice
and e-business);
(iii) Space
(iv) Technical and design infrastructure (see Annex
C)
(v) Expert Advice and other expenditure.
Programme budgets for some SBS activities,
such as Smart, were transferred to the Chief Executive of the
SBS from 1 April 2001. The balance of expenditure between these
budgets is shown in Figure 2.

Main Programme
areas
(i) Industrial exploitation of
science
1.10 One of the key features of a
modern economy is that firms and sectors need to master an increasingly
wide range of technologies. Whilst some support for R&D is focused
on the needs of particular sectors, other support is focused on
cross-sectoral issues such as materials and IT.
1.11 DTI support is mainly through
knowledge transfer programmes. Programmes aimed at creating
partnerships between the science and engineering base and businesses,
such as Faraday Partnerships, the Higher Education Innovation
Fund and the TCS (Teaching Company Scheme) are often jointly funded
by the Business Competitiveness Group and the OST through the
Science Budget (see Annex B).
1.12 LINK, which is managed by OST,
is the Government's principal mechanism for supporting collaborative
R&D between UK industry and the science base. It is mainly
managed through programmes covering discrete technology or generic
product areas. In response to priorities identified by Foresight,
five new LINK programmes, a stand alone project and the Foresight
Fund have been announced since September 1999. These include the
largest ever LINK programme, Applied Genomics - a £15 million
programme to assist healthcare companies to benefit from advances
such as the Human Genome Project.
1.13 The CARAD programme supports
the aeronautical industry through pre-competitive research
and technology demonstration to maintain and enhance the UK's
position as a world-leading aerospace manufacturer. Increasing
emphasis is being given to research to ensure the future environmental
sustainability of the industry, with particular emphasis on emissions
and noise. The aeronautics sector is a good example of where the
UK's success depends crucially on industry's ability to exploit
effectively our science and technology base. Major examples of
how CARAD has achieved this aim include: Airbus UK's position
as the designer and supplier of wing sets for all Airbus aircraft
- a business now worth around £1billion annually to the UK trade
balance, and the dominance of Rolls-Royce's Trent aeroengines
in their class.
1.14 In the Enterprise, Skills and
Innovation White Paper, it was announced that the DTI would be
seeking to maintain the UK as the leader in Europe in biotechnology
by supporting the harnessing of genomics and promoting a supportive
regulatory and fiscal environment in the UK and EU. To complement
the Research Councils' basic technologies programme, the White
Paper announced £25 million to encourage the exploitation of basic
technologies. The DTI is also to provide support to promote commercial
exploitation of research focusing on e-science.
1.15 Programmes to support the construction
industry aim to secure an efficient market in the industry, with
innovative and successful UK firms that meet the needs of clients
and society and are competitive at home and abroad. The Construction
Research and Innovation Programme supports research and innovation
projects which take forward the ideas and principles set out in
Rethinking Construction (the report of Sir John Egan's
Construction Task Force (8)) and Building
a better quality of life, the Government's strategy for sustainable
construction (9). It is implemented through
work commissioned from the Building Research Establishment (BRE)
under framework arrangements agreed at the time of the privatisation
of BRE, through the Partners in Innovation scheme which provides
around £7 million per annum in support of collaborative projects,
and through joint sponsorship of LINK schemes with the Engineering
and Physical Sciences Research Council.
1.16 There is a strong regional
dimension to DTI's aim to increase competitiveness. The Department
works through regional organisations to promote enterprise, innovation
and increased productivity taking account of regional differences.
Business development is often strongest when businesses cluster
together, through the stimulation and transfer of innovation,
knowledge, shared values and competitive pressures. But the requirements
for and provision of science and innovation capacity vary both
between and within regions. Promotion of the overall climate for
innovation and development of specific initiatives to enhance
capabilities or address particular weaknesses must be conducted
in the context of these variations. The advent of the RDAs and
development of their regional innovation strategies offers a chance
to bring a much greater coherence to the range of public and private
sector initiatives, intermediaries, support organisations and
networks.
1.17 For each region, an overall
framework is provided by the Regional Innovation Strategy (RIS)
developed by the RDA in conjunction with a range of regional and
sub-regional parties. Typical features of a RIS may include recognition
and stimulation of:
- industrial sectors of particular
significance to the region.
- networks that exist within the
region to foster collaboration, exchange of good practice etc.
- the role of universities and
research institutions, and the means by which their expertise
is made accessible to business, particularly SMEs and those
businesses unfamiliar with accessing such capabilities.
1.18 For activities developed specifically
at the regional level, the Regional Innovation Fund, valued at
£50m/year for the three years FY 2001/02 to FY 2003/04, offers
the main source of funding. This funding stream offers the RDAs
considerable flexibility to address regional and sub-regional
needs in the area of business incubation and local or regional
innovative clubs and networks.
1.19 Alongside national expenditure
programmes, DTI provides assistance to UK industry and academia
to participate in European collaborative research programmes such
as the EU Framework programme and the EUREKA scheme and to exploit
this for UK benefit. The EU's Framework R&D programmes are currently
worth about £9.5 billion over four years, some 5% of the total
public R&D expenditure across Europe.

(ii) Support for competitiveness
1.20 The Department supports a wide
range of activities, at both a national and regional level, aimed
at helping industry become more innovative through accessing existing
best practice and adopting existing and new technology
from both home and abroad. Much of this activity is targeted at
individual industry sectors or supply chains. For example, the
Department is expanding the network of Industry Forum Adaptation
initiatives, started by the Society of Motor Manufacturers & Traders'
Industry Forum, to address skills enhancements, adoption of new
technologies and supply chain efficiencies across a range of industry
sectors. These activities contribute to the Fit for the Future
national best practice campaign, run jointly with the CBI, helping
more companies achieve world-class performance. Consultancy studies
analysing the competitiveness of the main UK industrial sectors
and sub-sectors help determine which areas to support. The Department
aims to complete a fresh round of studies by March 2002.
1.21 Best practice is promoted across
all industries, including the construction industry. "Rethinking
Construction" focuses on bringing change in general construction,
in housing and in central and local government construction procurement.
DTI also supports the Construction Best Practice Programme which
provides a range of information and services to firms wanting
to change.
1.22 To achieve the goal of making
the UK the best place in the world to trade electronically, efforts
are being made to increase the use of information and communications
technologies by business, particularly among SMEs. The Enterprise,
Skills and Innovation White Paper announced new UK Online for
Business activities to enable increasingly sophisticated use of
e-business models and a Next Wave Technologies and Markets programmes
has been launched to stimulate the development of intelligent
appliances. The Department is also keen to take action to accelerate
the take-up of broadband technology and boost the UK market for
digital television.
1.23 An important aspect of competitiveness
will be the development of green technologies, products and services.
The DTI will continue, through its Sustainable Development Strategy,
to work with business to make the UK an international leader in
these markets. The Department is working jointly with DEFRA to
improve the environment and the sustainable use of natural resources,
including by reducing greenhouse gas emissions by 12.5% from 1990
levels and moving towards a 20% reduction in CO2 emissions by
2010.
1.24 Within the small firms'
sector, the importance of science, technology, design and innovation
are emphasised as part of a coherent approach to business development.
The SBS's strategy is to ensure that both existing SMEs and those
wishing to start in business have access to the help and expertise
that they need to develop and successfully implement a forward-looking
and challenging business development plan. Smart provides grants
to help individuals and small businesses in England research and
develop technologically innovative products and processes.
1.25 With the help of other departments,
the DTI has also been instrumental in introducing a new Government-wide
programme, the Small Business Research Initiative (SBRI), which
will open up government R&D procurement programmes to small firms.
Each participating department will aim to source at least 2.5%
of its relevant research procurement requirements from small firms,
with an overall target of procuring £50m of research under these
programmes from small firms. An example of a programme being opened
up in this way is the DTI's £40m per annum expenditure on measurement
science under the National Measurement System (see Annex C). As
part of the SBS National Gateway service (10),
firms will be able to obtain details on SBRI by calling the SBS
National Call Centre, by visiting the SBS website or by contacting
the Business Link Information and Advice Service (11).

(iii) Space
1.26 Public civil space activity
within the UK is co-ordinated by the British National Space Centre
(BNSC), an organisation led by DTI, and embracing Government,
industry and the academic community, including PPARC and NERC
(which are also covered in Annex B). DTI
spends around £90m per annum on space R&D activities in support
of national programmes and programmes through the European Space
Agency.
1.27 The UK Space Strategy for the
UK (12) was launched in August 1999, and describes
detailed objectives and targets for each policy area together
with the actions which will be pursued to achieve them.
1.28 Throughout BNSC's space activities,
there is increasing scope for public-private partnerships and
co-funding of commercially oriented space programmes is increasingly
the norm. The space sector has long been dominated by public spending,
but in 1996, international commercial expenditure exceeded government
spending for the first time and continues to grow. There are now
large commercial opportunities for the UK in the international
markets for space-based telecoms and navigation services which
are expected to be worth some $150bn a year by 2010. Today's challenges
are winning that business, providing affordable services to scientific
researchers and adapting the institutional structure of government
support to promote maximum success in both.
(iv) Expert Advice
1.29 DTI innovation support also
includes a small area of expenditure on expert advice and other
ad hoc issues. This primarily consists of a Consumer Safety Programme
which is aimed at protecting the consumer and ensuring products
sold on the market are safe, together with the run-out of the
support for the Sector Challenge programme. Through a separate
budget, DTI also supports activities to deepen the Department's
understanding of what industry needs in order to improve its competitiveness.
To help develop future thinking, the Department has recruited
24 industrial secondees into its Future and Innovation Unit. They
provide a valuable role in understanding and working with business,
in particular in developing the linkages between innovators and
providers of finance, and between industry and education.

Annex
B - "Making the most of the UK's science, engineering and technology"
Introduction
1.1 The science and engineering base
has a key contribution to make to the UK economy and way of life
through its generation of new ideas and techniques, and the development
of skilled people. The UK benefits from having a strong science
and engineering base. The Government's strategy in recent Spending
Reviews has been to invest in the science and engineering base
to ensure that it is placed to achieve standards of international
excellence and maximise its contribution of long-term economic
development and the quality of life in the UK. This investment
provides access to the global collaboration that is the driving
force of scientific advance.
Science Budget
objectives
1.2 The key DTI strategic science
and innovation priorities are to:
- Invest in the science base
to reverse years of decline, particularly:
- investing in the science research
infrastructure;
- funding basic SET research
that advances knowledge for its own sake, playing to the
UK's strengths and for the UK's long-term interest, and
is also sufficiently flexible for future science and technology
options;
- increasing the pool of talented
people trained by and working in the science and
engineering base, while raising skills and increasing expertise.
- Create incentives and build capacity
for knowledge transfer to maximise the contribution of
the science and engineering base to economic development and
quality of life.
The Science Budget's strategic priorities
largely relate directly to the excellence of the science base
and using knowledge transfer to maximise the contribution of the
science base to the wider economy.
The science and
engineering base and the dual support system
1.3 The UK science and engineering
base is largely made up of universities, research institutes and
the Research Councils. Its role is to conduct scientific research,
produce highly qualified scientists and engineers, and contribute
to UK's wealth creation and quality of life. The science and engineering
base is mostly funded by Government through the 'dual support
system' i.e. the Science Budget and funding through educational
Departments. The two legs of the dual support system have a different
emphasis but are complementary:
(i) the Science Budget (see Figure
3) which is managed by the Office of Science and Technology
(OST) provides grant in aid to the seven UK Research Councils:
- the Biotechnology and Biological
Sciences Research Council (BBSRC);
- the Engineering and Physical
Sciences Research Council (EPSRC);
- the Economic and Social Research
Council (ESRC);
- the Medical Research Council
(MRC);
- the Natural Environment Research
Council (NERC); and
- the Particle Physics and Astronomy
Research Council (PPARC).
- the Council for the Central Laboratory
of the Research Councils (CCLRC - not grant-awarding, rather
the custodian of large science facilities used by the research
communities of the other Councils.)
The Research Councils are Non-Departmental
Public Bodies (NDPBs), originally established by Royal Charter
by virtue of an Order in Council under the Science and Technology
Act 1965 and responsible to the Secretary of State for Trade and
Industry. The objectives of the Councils are defined in their
Royal Charters.
(ii) funding provided by the Department
for Education and Skills (DfES) and the Education Departments
of the devolved administrations through the Higher Education Funding
Councils, in support of block grant funding for the higher education
infrastructure.

How the Objectives
are met
Science Base
1.4 The Haldane recommendations of
1918 represent the real foundation of the science research system.
The essence of the Haldane principles is that Government is responsible
for science funding policy at the national level, but the initiative
for selecting particular research programmes comes from the academic
community.
1.5 OST has responsibility within
Government for preparing the case for the Science Budget in wider
public spending reviews. Following such reviews, it is the responsibility
of the Director-General of Research Councils, after consultation
with the wider scientific community, to recommend to the Secretary
of State how funds should be allocated to the individual Councils.
Funding is provided for the promotion of high quality basic, strategic
and applied research, and related postgraduate training through
grant-in-aid to the seven UK Research Councils. Some important,
but smaller programmes are administered by the Royal Society and
the Royal Academy of Engineering.
1.6 The importance of science to
a modern economy and the impact of globalisation demand that we
develop further our understanding of the impact of these issues
on science policy. How should international factors be balanced
against national or regional priorities? How do we manage exploitation
in a global market place? Most importantly, how do we ensure excellence
remains at the heart of all aspects of our science policies?
1.7 To illuminate these issues the
Government intends to commission further work that takes account
of the cross cutting review of science in the Spending Review
2000 and the Higher Education Funding Council for England's recent
work. It intends to review, in the light of the above factors,
how science priorities should be set, how the dissemination of
the outputs of the science and engineering base should be encouraged
and how the outputs and outcomes should be measured.
1.8 The Government has also initiated
a quinquennial review of the six grant-awarding Research Councils
and, following stage 1 of a separate quinquennial review, is setting
in place new funding arrangements for the Central Laboratory of
the Research Councils. These reviews will ask whether the Research
Council structure is optimised to get the best from the science
and engineering base. They will be complemented by the current
review of Foresight and the outcome of the transparency review
of university funding.
1.9 To meet its objectives concerning
the people in the science and engineering base, government is
increasing PhD stipends dramatically and, jointly with the Wolfson
Foundation, funding a scholarship scheme to enable universities
to recruit, reward, and develop researchers of outstanding achievement
and potential.
1.10 Universities have a growing
mission to play an active role in the economy in terms of developing
people with the right skills for the job for the future and encouraging
commercial applications for research. The Government is substantially
increasing - and placing on a permanent footing - funding for
knowledge transfer activities aimed at creating a closer partnership
and better diffusion of ideas between the science and engineering
communities, industry, commerce, charitable sectors and Government.

Knowledge Transfer
1.11 The Science Budget is used to
actively support the commercial exploitation of scientific research
findings, which it encourages within the broader context of the
process of knowledge transfer from the universities out into the
wider community. One of the primary means by which knowledge transfer
is achieved is by the movement of postgraduate students from academia
to the business community, and thus the application of knowledge
gained in the course of research training. The Government has
established a new Higher Education Innovation Fund (HEIF) which
will be the basis of a permanent third stream of funding for universities'
knowledge transfer activities. Other programmes have been established
to encourage entrepreneurial activity alongside scientific research,
including the Science Enterprise Challenge for the development
of centres for entrepreneurship training and University Challenge
which provides seed-corn funding for the exploitation of intellectual
property arising from academic research. To address concerns that
the supply of skilled scientists and engineers may not match business
needs, the Government has launched an independent study into the
provision of skilled scientists and engineers in the UK, led by
Sir Gareth Roberts, which is to be completed by February 2002.
1.12 The Research Councils and Government
Departments are working jointly to improve commercialisation of
research. The new Faraday Partnerships, supported jointly by DTI,
DEFRA, EPSRC, PPARC, NERC and BBSRC offer opportunities to universities,
firms and independent research organisations to work together
to bring research ideas for new products and processes to the
market more quickly.
Priorities for
the future
1.13 The UK needs to maintain its
world lead in the fields where it is strongest and develop a lead
in new areas, while maintaining the capacity to do science which
is recognisably world class across the board. Over the next few
years, there are a number of key opportunities for the UK science
and engineering base, in particular the following, all of which
have a high profile with the Foresight Panels, and have been identified
as priorities for funding from the new funds made available under
the SR2000 Science Budget settlement. These are relevant also
to increasing business innovation and will be key to the growth
industries of the future (see Annex A).
- Post-genomic research.
The next stage of scientific research following the decoding
of the human genome is to identify the function of genes. This
will be a key step in understanding many diseases, including
cancer and heart disease. The UK has a strong industrial base
from which to exploit research results in this area.
- E-science for e-business and
informatics. There is an urgent need for radically new hardware
and software solutions to permit the processing, communication,
storage, analysis and visualisation of the huge expansion of
data now being produced by global teams of scientists. This
new generation of 'e-science' infrastructure will underpin the
next generation of e-business technology used across the board
later this decade.
- Basic technology. This
combines elements both of pure research and the early stages
of technological development. It covers that R&D which contributes
to both scientific knowledge and useful technological knowledge.
In many cases it provides a stage in the process by which scientific
advances lead to novel products and processes but often involves
the development of the skills and technologies which underpin
future research. Currently basic technology embraces areas such
as nanotechnology, quantum computing, photonics and sensors,
each of which will form the basis of new industries of the future.
Basic technology is usually multi-disciplinary involving more
than one Research Council community.
International collaboration
1.14 To play a full part in modern
science and to bring its benefits to the UK we also have to co-operate
internationally. The UK is committed to creating closer contacts
and stronger links between researchers and research organisations
internationally. We are doubling the network of science and technology
attaches in Embassies abroad. The EU proposals to create a European
Research Area (ERA) offer new opportunities to strengthen our
ability to compete, as a union, in global markets. The OST leads
for the UK on ERA and is playing a key role in shaping international
negotiations on the next EU Framework Programme of R&D (Framework
6 2002-2006) which will be a key tool for its realisation. The
Council of Ministers and European Parliament are currently negotiating
the next Programme, based on a Commission proposal for a 17.5
billion Euro investment, that is due to begin in 2002. The bulk
of this Community money will be given a welcome degree of focus.
It will aim to create a critical mass in a small number of crucial
areas, for example biotechnology, nanotechnology, information
technology and cleaner energy technologies, which will be key
to the EU's ability to compete on the world stage in these prosperity-generating
areas.

Annex
C - "Developing strong, competitive markets within a regulatory
framework which promotes fairness and sustainability"
Introduction
1.1 The Department's science and
innovation activities can contribute to creating strong and competitive
markets, while at the same time strong competitive markets can
themselves stimulate science and innovation activities in industry.
It is important also to have a strong and transparent framework
for science and technology. This is directly related to building
public confidence in science, without which it will be difficult
for society and the economy to fully benefit from science. The
overall framework is also vital, from using the intellectual property
rights system to foster innovation, to providing measurements
and standards support, and creating the right infrastructures
for technologies of the future, such as communications and energy
(see Annex A also).
Objectives
1.2 The key DTI strategic science
and innovation priorities are to:
- Build public confidence in
science by ensuring the Department's legal and regulatory
work follows the Guidelines on the use of scientific advice
in policy-making;
- Administer Intellectual Property
Rights to ensure that national, European and international
systems encourage innovation and competition;
- Create an infrastructure for
information and communication technologies which gives all
firms and individuals convenient and economical access to broadband
services, to foster the growth of e-business and an integrated
networked society;
- Promote the development and deployment
of safe and sustainable energy technologies;
- Maintain the UK's National
Measurement System and ensure that it meets the needs of
UK trade, industry, innovation and public policy;
- Support the development of technical
standards for products, services and quality management,
which underpin regulation and which remove technical barriers
to trade;
- Access existing evidence
and procure new research where necessary to improve the Department's
understanding of the impact or potential impact of DTI regulatory
activity on individuals (e.g. consumers), businesses and the
economy as a whole.
Scientific advice
1.3 The revised Guidelines on
the use of scientific advice in policy making (13)
place greater emphasis on the need to involve stakeholder groups
in the development of scientific evidence-based policy and the
need to be open about the degree of uncertainty attached to a
piece of advice. Other key messages are the early identification
of issues, obtaining advice from a wide range of sources, and
publication of the scientific advice and relevant papers. A Code
of Practice for scientific advisory committees is also under
development, to ensure that committees maintain both their independence
and high levels of transparency in carrying out their work. DTI
is committed to following these guidelines and to assessing, managing
and communicating risk (14) as part of the
policy-making process.
Intellectual Property
Rights
1.4 The Patent Office (15)
is an executive agency of the DTI, responsible for administering
and developing a clear and effective framework of Intellectual
Property Rights (IPR) domestically and at European and international
levels. The rapid pace of scientific and technological change
poses enormous challenges to the IPR system - are the traditional
boundaries for what is patentable and what is not still right?
where do the boundaries lie between scientific discovery and technological
invention? how is copyright enforced in the internet era? In addressing
these strategic issues it is essential to keep sight of the fundamental
aim of the IPR system - to stimulate innovation, enterprise and
competition.
1.5 Patent information offers a wealth
of scientific and technological information. The accessibility
and use of this information is a key issue for further stimulating
innovation. The Patent Office is also taking forward work to simplify
and reduce the costs of patent procedures in the UK, and internationally
to make it easier and cheaper to obtain and enforce patent rights.
1.6 Priorities for the Patent Office
for the future include:
- reviewing existing consultation
processes and explore new ways to reach the widest possible
range of interests (16);
- the introduction of an affordable
Community patent;
- ratifying an international treaty
to harmonise and deregulate the formal requirements for the
acquisition and enforcement of patent rights;
- working for early introduction
of a world wide system for electronic trading in IPR and invest
in IT to automate the UK IPR system; and
- working with the Small Business
Service to ensure SMEs have ready access to information to help
them obtain the protection they really want.

Communications
Infrastructure
1.7 The development of an efficient
and effective information and communications infrastructure is
essential if UK business is to be competitive in an increasingly
global marketplace. The Government's recent White Paper "A New
Future for Communications"(17) sets out proposals
for a new regulatory framework for the electronic communications
sector. The central proposal is to create a new unified regulator
(OFCOM) responsible for the communications sector which will replace
several existing regulators. The objectives of the new regulatory
framework are:
- to make Britain home to the most
dynamic and competitive communications and media market in the
world;
- to ensure universal access to
a choice of diverse services of the highest quality;
- to ensure that citizens and consumers
are safeguarded.
1.8 DTI's overall aim on e-commerce
is to make the UK the best place in the world to trade electronically.
This is being measured by the cost of Internet access and the
extent of business-to-business and business-to-consumer transactions
carried out over e-commerce networks. The Department's targets
for the period 1999-2002 which relate directly to e-commerce are
to increase the number of UK SMEs wired up to the digital market
place from 350,000 to 1.5 million by 2002 and to make the UK the
best place in the world to trade electronically by 2002.
1.9 The Department, in dialogue with
industry, is developing a Next Wave Technologies and Markets programme.
'Next Wave' technologies comprise a host of intelligent appliances
that can communicate with each other and the outside world and
will create new markets for products and services tailored to
the individual. The centrepiece of the programme will be an Interdisciplinary
Research Centre for manufacturers and researchers to explore the
possibilities and characteristics of intelligent appliances.
Energy markets
1.10 Investment in the development
and deployment of safe and sustainable energy technologies is
vital to ensure the long-term provision of secure, diverse and
sustainable supplies of energy in the UK, both in terms of our
environmental emissions commitments and the likely long-term decline
in the availability of fossil fuels. The importance of which became
more than apparent during last year's fuel crisis. The Energy
Group within DTI will launch a consultation exercise on future
policy for energy-related technology development in 2001. The
themes of the proposed consultation are reflected in the strategy
outlined below. The strategy for funding will be designed to set
the direction and scope for R&D and related activities over the
longer term, and will aim to be sufficiently dynamic to respond
to changes in political priorities and energy market requirements.
1.11 The UK energy sector has many
strengths on which to build; there are, however, a number of weaknesses
across the sector that, if not addressed, could seriously limit
options for developing future energy policy and fully exploiting
business opportunities at home and overseas. These include low
levels of R&D funding and subsequent exploitation by both Government
and industry, high level of investment required in ageing infrastructure,
rapidly reducing expertise in nuclear plant design and construction.
1.12 Climate change concerns should
be seen as a major business opportunity, and there is a need to
reduce the environmental impact of using energy across all sectors
to contribute to the UK's emissions targets. The UK is, however,
facing a number of threats, such as higher investment levels overseas
and over-dependence on gas imports, that could impact on its ability
to capture an appropriate share of available UK and global business.
This could limit the scope for Government to develop policy options
to ensure long term energy security and low costs to consumers.
1.13 In the current financial year
the Energy Group is forecast to spend over £40 million in supporting
sustainable research and technological development in the areas
of new and renewable energy, cleaner coal, oil & gas extraction
and in the nuclear industry. In addition, the Cabinet Office Performance
and Innovation Unit is currently investigating options for the
allocation of the £100m funding for renewable energy announced
by the Prime Minister earlier in the year.
1.14 In addition to funding referred
to above, energy-related R&D activity attracts funding through
the Science Budget, primarily through the Engineering and Physical
Sciences Research Council (EPSRC). Between £15-37 million per
annum of the EPSRC budget spend is on energy-related topics. Funding
for energy-related technology developments is also available through
LINK programmes and the Smart scheme on a project by project basis,
and through various European programmes such as Framework 5. There
are also a number of generic programmes supported by DTI that
may impact on a number of Energy Group programmes e.g. materials
issues.
1.15 Recent studies by the International
Energy Agency suggest that energy technology policies should recognise
two distinct phases in bringing technology developments to commercial
maturity. The first phase is direct R&D support to initiate research
on uncertain technology options, which present a high investment
risk; the second is public pre-competitive demonstration expenditure
to seed the industry R&D process.
1.16 With hindsight, the UK has arguably
not focused sufficient attention on the second phase, i.e. the
need to follow through successful R&D with effective deployment
programmes. This is in large part due to the not-inconsiderable
public funds required to support demonstration and related deployment.
While the UK has not got the resources to do everything, there
is a need to ensure that support for priority areas includes both
R&D and deployment activities in order that the full benefits
of investment and the potential commercial opportunities may be
fully exploited UK industry. Given that support for demonstration
and deployment of energy technologies has substantial implications
for public expenditure, a key aspect of the Energy Group's strategy
in this area is the requirement for a rigorous review of options
to encourage deployment, in addition to grant aid support on a
case by case basis.
1.17 For renewable technologies,
the way forward for assisting deployment is through a combination
of an obligation on electricity suppliers to utilise renewables
and capital grants for the less commercial renewable technologies,
such as offshore wind. However, lessons learnt from overseas deployment
and demonstration programmes would suggest that support for demonstration
projects does not necessarily lead to commercialisation of technologies
and other market barriers to deployment are equally, if not more
important, to address.

Technical and Design Infrastructure
1.18 Measurement technology is an
indispensable component of a modern economy and a building block
of the globalisation of commerce. The United Kingdom National
Measurement System (UK NMS) is the infrastructure of laboratories
(18) and services which ensures that users
can be confident that their measurements and those of their customers
and suppliers are consistently traceable back to nationally and
internationally accepted primary reference standards - and are
therefore both valid and fit for purpose.
1.19 The UK NMS is underpinned by
the DTI funded NMS Research Programme (approx. £40m per annum)
to meet the needs of UK trade, industry, innovation, and public
policy. Much of the research is long-term and aimed at improving
accuracy in the expectation that both industrial and regulatory
measurement will become more demanding. Some is more directly
applicable to improvements in instrument or sensor technology.
Part of the DTI funding is spent on dissemination programmes aimed
at the spread of best measurement practice. The Department also
funds legal metrology and international programmes to promote
research collaboration and inter-comparison between national institutes.
Current NMS research programmes cover a wide range of measurement
topics, for example - electrical, time & frequency, chemical,
biological, ionising radiation, acoustics, mass, length, flow,
optical, thermal, and materials testing.
1.20 Technical standards cover
a wide range of specifications that are used for manufactured
products, services and quality management. They make a vital contribution
to improving UK competitiveness and the dissemination of technical
and other innovations and best practice. Public standards co-exist
with private specifications (such as consortia or industry standards).
Whilst standards development is primarily market driven, the Government
seeks to ensure both prioritisation of that activity and a balance
of stakeholder interests (so that no one interest can predominate
or make the activity exclusive). Standards are also used to underpin
regulation - indeed they help simplify regulation and reduce regulatory
burdens; and for public procurement. Standards are a key to removing
technical barriers to trade and thus also contribute to the Department's
third objective to create strong and competitive markets.
1.21 Technical standardisation is
facilitated in the UK by the British Standards Institution (BSI),
a Royal Charter body independent of Government. BSI is the UK's
representative in the international and European standards bodies:
its participation is determined by priorities set by BSI's major
stakeholders, especially business. DTI provides direct funding
to BSI itself as well as supporting volunteer participants in
standards development.
1.22 The wider and better use of
design throughout the UK economy is promoted by the Design
Council, a Non-Departmental Public Body with a Royal Charter,
which is funded by grant-in-aid from the DTI (£6.6 million in
2001-2002). It is the Design Council's mission to inspire British
business to understand the central role design can play in the
development of world-class goods and services, and to enable business
to do so.
Evidence-based policy
1.23 Across all of its legal and
regulatory activities it is important that policy-makers draw
on existing evidence and procure new research where necessary
to improve their understanding of the impact or potential impact
of DTI regulatory activity on individuals businesses and the economy
as a whole e.g. this is already done in consumer affairs. Making
best use of appropriate and timely scientific and technological
evidence clearly has an important role to play, and is an area
the Department will take a fresh look as it strives to fulfil
its commitment to evidence-based policy.

Annex
D - White Paper commitments for science and innovation
The Government has made a number
of commitments relevant to science and innovation in two recent
White Papers: the Science and Innovation White Paper "Excellence
and Opportunity - a science and innovation policy for the 21st
Century", July 2000; and the Enterprise, Skills and Innovation
White Paper "Opportunity for all in a world of change", February
2001. A number of these commitments have already been completed
- details of the state of play of each can be found in the respective
implementation plans:
Science and Innovation White
Paper Implementation Plan - www.dti.gov.uk/ost/whatsnew
Enterprise, Skills and Innovation
White Paper Implementation Plan - www.dti.gov.uk/opportunityforall
I. INVESTMENT
Science and Innovation White Paper
commitments:
- invest in a new £1 billion programme
(in partnership with The Wellcome Trust) to renew the infrastructure
for science;
- give a £250 million boost to research
in key new areas that will shape life in the 21st century: genomics,
e-science and basic technologies;
- provide additional funding to
increase (over three years) the basic support for post-graduate
research students to £9,000 a year;
- launch (in partnership with The
Wolfson Foundation and The Royal Society) an initial fund of
£4 million a year to assist in the recruitment of up to 50 top
researchers;
- make 2001/2002 Science Year and
run a new Science Ambassadors Programme to capture children's
imagination and encourage them to take-up careers in science
and engineering.
Enterprise, Skills and Innovation
White Paper commitments:
- provide a further £90 million
(to complement recent investment) to promote the commercial
exploitation of research focusing on genomics, basic technologies
and e-science.

II. FACILITATION
Science and Innovation White Paper
commitments:
- establish a Higher Education
Innovation Fund of £140 million over three years (incorporating
the Higher Education Reach-Out to Business and the Community
fund) to build on universities' potential as drivers of growth
in the knowledge economy;
- launch a new Foresight fund, initially
up to £15 million, to get the best ideas from Foresight 2000
put into action fast;
- run one further round of the
University Challenge competition to provide seed venture funding
for knowledge transfer;
- double the number of new starts
for Faraday Partnerships, from four to eight a year, to link
the science base to business networks;
- put £15 million more into Science
Enterprise Centres to bring business skills into the science
curriculum;
- create new Regional Innovation
Funds worth £50 million a year to enable Regional Development
Agencies to support clusters and incubators and new clubs of
scientists, entrepreneurs, managers and financiers;
- support 20 Business Fellows who
will lead their academic colleagues in working with business;
- publish Science and Innovation
Strategies for Government departments;
- introduce a Small Business Research
Initiative to open up to small firms R&D procurement worth up
to £1 billion, with a target of procuring £50 million of research
from them;
- change the rules for Government
funded research so that research bodies own the Intellectual
Property Rights; issue new guidelines on incentives and risk-taking
for staff in public sector research establishments; and provide
£10 million to commercialise research done in the public sector,
including the NHS;
- double the number of International
Technology Promoters from 8 to 16 and link their work closely
with British Trade International and other UK agencies overseas
to help UK universities and businesses make new partnerships
across the world; extend the network of science attachés in
embassies abroad.
Enterprise, Skills and Innovation
White Paper commitments:
- establish new University Innovation
Centres and Technology Institutes in the regions to boost research
and development, innovation and technology transfer and to provide
the regions with skills in ICT and high technology;
- boost enterprise in all regions
by launching a new £75 million Incubator Fund and developing
£50 million of new funding to provide early stage money for
new and growing businesses;
- give special support to the manufacturing
industry by establishing a new Manufacturing Advisory Service;
- promote the growth of successful
clusters;
- remove constraints to growth by
inviting Regional Development Agencies to develop strategies
for success in their regions;
- accelerate the take-up of broadband
technology by businesses and households and, as a first step,
is providing £30 million for innovative schemes to meet local
requirements;
- take action to boost digital
TV which will transform the communications services available
in the home and open-up new markets and service opportunities;
- take action to stimulate the
development of content for digital technologies;
- provide a further £30 million
to increase awareness and understanding among all businesses
of the challenges and opportunities of e-business;
- encourage development and take-up
of more resource efficient and environmentally friendly products
and energy systems by promoting markets for new technologies
which reduce waste and by embarking on a major initiative with
industry and others to achieve a UK Solar Photovoltaic Demonstration
Programme in line with those of our main competitors.

III. REGULATION
Science and Innovation White Paper
commitments:
- implement stronger guidelines
from the Chief Scientific Adviser on how scientific advice should
be used in drawing up Government policy;
- publish a Code of Practice for
all Scientific Advisory Committees committing them to high levels
of openness and transparency in their work.
Enterprise, Skills and Innovation
White Paper commitments:
- significantly relax insolvency
rules;
- adopt a more commercial approach
to company rescue proposals put to Government by companies in
short-term financial difficulties;
- give the Office of Fair Trading
a new pro-competitive role to spot existing and proposed regulations
which hold back dynamic and competitive markets;
- drive forward the Small Business
Service strategy "Think Small First".

Annex
E - The place of science and innovation in the UK
Introduction
1.1 Competitiveness represents the
ability of the UK to sustain a high and rising standard of living
while continuing to pay its way in the World. Given the increasing
globalisation of the World Economy and the growing intensity of
competition both from other advanced industrial countries and
those countries which are in the process of industrialisation,
we can only remain competitive if UK firms are constantly upgrading
their products and processes and vigorously exploiting new commercial
and technology opportunities.
1.2 The increased emphasis on time
to market has led to the concept of the "innovation system." This
is loosely defined as the interaction at local, national and international
levels of the specific actors involved in innovation (enterprises,
universities, the public sector), each of whom has an effect dependent
on their individual innovation performance. Globally, innovation
systems are adapting to needs of the knowledge economy. Strong
similarities are emerging between innovation systems in different
countries - a trend being re-enforced as administrations look
to the successful US system for examples of good practice.
1.3 The key factors in innovation
performance set the broad framework for most innovation systems:
- investment in knowledge creation;
- the transfer and exploitation
of scientific research, knowledge and know-how;
- entrepreneurial activity; and
- the supply of appropriate human
resources.
1.4 In addition we are seeing a growing
emphasis on regional economic development and the development
of networks linking regional clusters of innovation at national
and international levels. This development reflects the emerging
recognition that global competitiveness is increasingly based
on local co-operation, which distant rivals find hard to replicate.
1.5 No longer is it enough to encourage
investment in R&D. Increasingly, inefficiencies need to be addressed
in other parts of the innovation system arising from, for example,
inflexible institutions, communication gaps, lack of finance and
networks, or lack of mobile skilled labour.
1.6 It is often these complementary
changes which the UK has found difficult to achieve successfully,
which explains that while our performance at scientific research
and the development of novel technology appears excellent, our
record at innovation often falls short of that of our principal
competitors. The UK seems to generate plenty of new ideas, but
we are much less good at the difficult and often protracted task
of implementing them successfully.
UK Strengths and
weaknesses
1.7 There are widely recognised structural
and institutional strengths and weaknesses of the UK economy that
condition or affect directly the motives and ability of enterprises
to innovate effectively. The relative position of the UK can be
judged from comparative indicators such as:
- Managing National Innovation
Systems, OECD 1999;
- Stimulating Creativity and Innovation
in Europe, UNICE 2000;
- UK Competitiveness Indicators,
DTI 2000; and
- European Innovation Scoreboard,
CEC 2000.
1.8 UK strengths include:
- A world class academic science
base. With only 1 per cent of the world's population, the
UK funds 4.5 per cent of the world's science and produces 8
per cent of the world's scientific research papers;
- Many strengths in science-based
industries such as pharmaceuticals, financial services,
computer games, mobile telephone software and services;
- Well-developed communications
infrastructure placing us in a strong position for internet
development;
- A number of high-tech clusters
of importance, and the largest venture capital industry
in the EU;
- Strong inward investment
of an increasingly high-value, high-tech character;
- a world class national standards
body, as a source of technical knowledge for innovation.
1.9 However many weaknesses persist,
for example:
- Weak investment in R&D
compared to international competitors;
- Skills shortages in, for
example, the supply of trained craftsmen/technicians/IT specialists
and some other specialist groups;
- Qualified scientists and engineers'
apparent lack of certain management and leadership skills
due to over-specialisation in their specific field;
- Insufficient understanding
of the importance of science and technology amongst business
managers with a non S&T background;
- Lack of strategic commitment
to innovation and organic growth by larger UK companies and
weaknesses in the management of the innovation;
- Gaps in the capital market's coverage
of the financing needs of growth oriented SMEs. Despite
the strong venture capital industry, relatively little UK venture
capital goes into early-stage and technology-based investments
compared with Germany and the US.

Opportunities and Threats
1.10 As the stock of S&T knowledge
expands, its scope to be applied to less high-tech products
and markets increases. This offers a potential advantage to countries
like the UK who have a strong science and engineering base, providing
we can improve the ability of companies in these sectors to access
and exploit scientific knowledge.
1.11 Globalisation of S&T
and the rise of Internet trading (which will lower costs of accessing
new markets) plus earlier globalisation of trade, finance and
investment together with the emergence of developing economies
providing UK based firms with a massive expansion in business
opportunities overseas. The growth in internet usage in
the UK allows more and more companies access to huge amounts of
information and codified knowledge. The opportunities afforded
by rapid digitised knowledge transfer and e-commerce appear
immense.
1.12 Sustainability is set
to become a major business driver. Stricter environmental standards,
be they mandatory and/or consumer driven, have the potential to
provide a stimulus for domestic innovation, especially as many
UK companies are at the forefront of environmental technologies.
1.13 It is vital that UK firms, as
well as embracing developments in S&T and investing in the relevant
skills and knowledge, appreciate the need to change management
and organisational practices required to successfully adopt
new technologies and to thrive in a market place where consumers
and competitors have instant access to a wealth of critical market
information.
1.14 The globalisation of markets
and the rapid projected growth of E-commerce provide a great
competitive threat to many companies who have, to date, been used
to competing mainly with domestic (and a limited number of foreign)
rivals. Only if companies respond promptly will it be a positive
driver for UK innovation.
1.15 The UK is increasingly faced
with fierce international competition to produce the best research.
Other nations, such as USA and Japan, are systematically increasing
their investment levels in basic S&T, with the clear expectation
of reaping commensurate economic benefits. Inadequate understanding
of S&T and the inability to cope with technological change
may slow progress.
1.16 In developing policy for the
Science and Innovation White Paper published last year, the Department's
economists produced an assessment of the UK's innovation performance,
strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, threats and main problems.
A full summary of their analysis is available at http://www2.dti.gov.uk/tese/ecslist.htm.
1.17 The Foresight programme
(19), run by the Office of Science and Technology,
facilitates thinking across professional boundaries and is a key
tool in helping to identify opportunities and threats and build
shared visions of the future. In December 2000, the results of
the Foresight Panels' studies on key priorities for the UK were
published, listing key recommendations for action. The Foresight
Steering Group will shortly publish an over-arching report drawing
on the Panel reports to set out the key challenges facing the
UK over the coming decades. The focus from now until mid-2002
will be on implementation. Businesses will be supported in accessing
the programme, and in developing their own strategies for future
innovation and growth, through close collaboration between the
Small Business Service and Regional Development Agencies and the
Foresight programme. The Chief Scientific Adviser is currently
conducting a review of Foresight to ensure that the programme
builds on the work done so far and is properly focused to face
the challenges ahead. A clear vision for the future of Foresight
is expected by the end of October 2001, with implementation commencing
in April 2002.
Rationale for DTI support
1.18 Government should only be involved
where market failure inhibits the ability of firms to undertake
necessary or useful activities by themselves and where
the Government has the knowledge and capability to act effectively.
Market failure often occurs where research has no immediate commercial
return or where the costs are too high for 100% private investment.
Thus although the significance of innovation and technology development
in the economy as a whole is much greater than that of scientific
research, government's role in the latter is inevitably much greater
than in the former. Government funding of R&D is based on the
premise that social rates of return on some activities are higher
than private rates of return.
1.19 DTI strategy towards science,
technology and innovation should aim at securing a balanced allocation
of resources to these activities in society as a whole. In particular,
the Department needs to strike a balance between the funding of
scientific research to meet all our future needs with measures
to ensure that the UK is capable of exploiting the results.
1.20 The case of Government support
for science and innovation cannot rest on "market failure" alone.
Government must also be able to act effectively and with a reasonable
chance of getting value for the taxpayers' money. In addition
if we are to get the best value from DTI support for science and
innovation, it needs to be formulated in context of an overall
strategy. The criteria set out below have therefore been established
to test whether support is justified in specific circumstances:
- Funding should support the delivery
of the Department's policy aims and objectives;
- Funding should add to the scientific
knowledge base and/or contribute to wealth creation, productivity
and jobs;
- Discussions about R&D and other
funding should reflect themes or opportunities identified by
Foresight;
- All support for research should
pass the test of scientific and technological excellence. Second
rate scientific research is of little use to anyone;
- As far as possible the Department
should not support R&D and other activities which would otherwise
have been funded by the private sector in the same form and
within the same timescales;
- Wherever possible, and to our
advantage, the UK should seek to collaborate with other countries
in funding R&D in order to enjoy economies of scale and scope.
Unnecessary duplication of R&D being undertaken overseas
should be avoided.
- Funded projects and programmes
should state clearly how the results will be exploited, by whom
and in what form and timescale and how that exploitation will
contribute to wealth creation and social well being. As far
as possible they should incorporate a strategy for fostering
exploitation (20);
- All support should be subject
to appropriate monitoring and evaluation which should reflect
the view of users, and in the case of scientific research, peers.
1.21 In the case of support to industry
or for industry/university collaboration, compliance with these
criteria is set out in a ROAME (21) statement
which defines the mechanisms for new expenditure programmes. ROAME
statements are analogous with a business plan but reflect the
particular circumstances in which Government acts to support science
and industry.

Annex
F - Departmental issues affecting science and innovation policy
Communication across
government and with stakeholders
1.1 As part of the Modernising Government
Agenda (22), DTI is firmly committed to open
communication both within Government and with its stakeholders.
A key role for the OST is maintaining contact with all relevant
departments and Research Councils involved in science and innovation
across Government. This is aided by the Chief Scientific Adviser's
Committee, where representatives from 15 departments and devolved
administrations meet regularly to discuss issues of common concern.
Right across DTI, officials regularly discuss both policy and
programme formation with a wide variety of individuals and organisations
across the business and scientific environment.
1.2 Overseas contacts also form an
important part of developing strategy and programmes. Strong bilateral
links are maintained with key overseas administrations to transfer
good practice and better inform national policy formulation. International
collaboration enables UK researchers to exchange ideas with research
teams in other countries and benefit from economies of scale and
scope, often permitting the UK scientific community to participate
in programmes whose costs to any one country might otherwise be
prohibitive. Creating the capabilities to exploit the results
of successful R&D carried out overseas is a key part of the UK
strategy.
1.3 DTI's information and communication
technology infrastructure was extensively updated in 1999-2000
and provides an effective tool for communication both across Government
and to the outside community. The Department remains on track
to meet its target for all key services to be electronically available
by 2005 and is working with a number of other departments and
bodies and contributing to central initiatives such as the UK
Online programme.
1.4 In partnership with the Wellcome
Trust, and with the assistance of a number of its stakeholders,
OST has undertaken a major review of science communication in
the UK, including a baseline survey of public attitudes to science
and engineering. The results of this work, published in December
2000 and entitled "Science and the Public - A review of Science
Communication and Public Attitudes to Science in Britain"(23)
will be of great value to those organisations involved in science
communication, not least the OST itself.
S&T expertise within the DTI
1.5 DTI's requirement for scientific
and technological expertise reflects the nature of its responsibilities
and the goals it is trying to achieve, and can be categorised
broadly as follows:
(i) the management of R&D and technology
procurement programmes;
(ii) the management of technology support programmes for business;
and
(iii) the provision of advice in relation to specific regulatory
tasks.
1.6 The weight of DTI's HQ requirements
for scientifically qualified staff falls in the first two categories,
i.e. for those who manage the activities of others, rather than
directly engaging in research or laboratory work. The main requirement
in these areas is for "technology generalists" who are able to
understand the nature of the S&T questions at issue, but do not
themselves need leading edge specialist knowledge.
1.7 The Department still has a large
cadre of scientifically trained staff well able to manage procurement
and technology support programmes, many of whom were originally
recruited to the Department's laboratories which were privatised
or contracted out in the mid-1990s. But, given that this channel
of recruitment has now ceased, the number is inevitably declining
as people retire. In the longer term the Department may therefore
have difficulty in maintaining a cadre of sufficiently qualified
staff. It will therefore need to keep under review the balance
of supply and demand and, if necessary, target such expertise
in future staff recruitment exercises.
1.8 In addition, over the last 10
years or so, DTI has participated in special fast stream arrangements
aimed at attracting those with S&T backgrounds. This has been
successful in recruiting staff with S&T backgrounds to help fill
the Department's needs for "technology generalists" - but not
for particular specialisms. The Department will keep this line
of recruitment under review to ensure that it sustains an element
of scientific and technical expertise in its future senior management.
1.9 There are however some jobs which
require specific expertise not available in present staff, for
which recruitment is sometimes difficult e.g. regulatory jobs
dealing with oil and gas production technologies, and reservoir
engineering. In these cases the Department seeks to recruit staff
from outside, either from other Government Departments or the
open market. The Department also has an extensive programme of
exchanges with private industry. This can also be used to fill
posts where special experience is needed and can be particularly
useful in fast-moving areas where up-to-date commercial experience
is needed (e.g. in the IT sector).

Commercial exploitation of departmental
research
1.10 DTI (excluding OST and the Research
Councils) no longer has any of its own research establishments
and therefore does not undertake any research itself. Only a small
proportion of DTI's total S&T spend is directed towards research
commissioned by the Department. This mainly relates to its support
for metrology under the National Measurement System (NMS). Of
the £40m annual expenditure, approximately 70% is spent on research
and development activities. The balance provides for maintenance
of standards, dissemination of knowledge and standards, and management
and formulation of programmes.
1.11 The National Physical Laboratory
(NPL) is the largest single supplier for the NMS programmes. Although
it remains Government owned, NPL is now operated on behalf of
the Secretary of State by a private sector contractor. Intellectual
property from NMS programmes at NPL is vested in the Secretary
of State as owner of the Laboratory. But the operating contractor
has a licence to exploit all past and future intellectual property
at NPL and the benefits of doing so accrue to the operating contractor.
In the case of other suppliers, intellectual property rights from
NMS programmes is formally vested in the Secretary of State in
accordance with the Department's standard terms and conditions.
But a duty is imposed on the suppliers to make their best efforts
to exploit intellectual property generated in the course of the
work. The benefits of exploitation accrue to the suppliers, though
subject to the Department having a right to a share in the proceeds.
Following an independent review of the NMS programme, in which
the needs of innovators were a key consideration, DTI believes
that there is considerable scope for improving the benefits derived
from the investment in this work. The Department is implementing
plans to ensure that DTI spending on research, development and
dissemination through the NMS programme contributes more to innovation
in the UK, for example improving the diffusion of NMS results
by direct involvement of industry when NMS programmes are being
drawn up and by pursuing more industrial partnerships.
1.12 The OST are currently working
with HM Treasury and the Patent Office to develop some guidelines
on intellectual property issues for Public Sector Research Establishments
(PSREs). This arises from a report by John Baker "Creating Knowledge,
Creating Wealth" (24), which recommended ways
of increasing the rate of exploitation of research undertaken
by PSREs. The report identified a lack of a more risk-taking culture
as being a serious deterrent to PSRE commercialisation. The Government
has accepted most of the report's recommendations and is working
on their implementation.
1.13 Other areas of DTI innovation
spend are intended to lead to successful exploitation to the benefit
of the UK economy, whether it is access for companies to new technology,
management best practice or business information. Standard offer
letters make this clear and officials clarify, in arranging the
support, how the results are intended to be exploited. When projects
have been completed, project officers are required to maintain
contact with the organisations concerned to ensure that exploitation
of the results occurs.
Evaluation
1.14 DTI has a well-established system
of evaluation, which starts with the genesis of a new initiative
and runs until some years after the initiative has ended. The
foundation of the system is the ROAME statement, which defines
the Rationale, Objective and Appraisal, Monitoring and Evaluation
mechanisms for expenditure programmes, and which attracts international
interest. Any programme involving significant resources, such
as total expenditure over £1m, must have an agreed ROAME statement
before expenditure can be incurred. Moreover, every proposal for
funding, however large or small, must include key factors likely
to be included in an evaluation. Evaluation work has several benefits:
most commonly, it helps improve and refine particular programmes
of support; occasionally, but quite rarely, it produces results
which lead to the abandonment or sharp curtailment of a particular
programme.
1.15 The main responsibility for
evaluating Science Budget funded research has been delegated to
the Research Councils. They conduct ex ante appraisal of
research proposals, a minority of which are funded, and then post
hoc evaluation of the outcome of research through examination
of end of project reports. At project and programme level, the
peer review system grades the scientific quality of research by
evaluation of final research reports. The Research Councils also
evaluate the research conducted at their own institutes. OST's
role is to ensure that such processes are in place, to evaluate
the outcome of central initiatives, and to monitor the overall
situation.
1.16 DTI's Strategic Evaluation Committee
(SEC) was set up last year to bring a greater strategic focus
to all DTI's evaluation activity. The aims of the SEC are:
- to ensure that the Department
takes a strategic and outcome focussed approach to evaluation
in order to help underpin policy, assist resource allocation
decisions and help to achieve the Department's objectives; and
- to draw out policy lessons and
promote better use of evaluation evidence in policy making,
in line with the Modernising Government agenda.
1.17 The SEC has drawn up plans to
develop an evaluation programme which focuses on assessing performance
against Public Service Agreement targets and compares the relative
effectiveness of different activities in meeting them. The SEC
will also be supported by a Cross Departmental Research Network,
which will provide an overview of research across different areas
of the Department. The aim is to ensure that knowledge is shared,
duplication is avoided, and that results with cross-cutting relevance
are drawn out and can be used effectively in the Department's
evaluation work and policy analysis.
Department of Trade and Industry
August 2001

Figure
1: DTI total S&T expenditure (excluding the Science Budget)
| Subject
area
£M |
1999/00
Outturn |
2000/01
Working Provision |
2001/02
Plan |
2002/03
Plan |
2003/04
Plan |
| Innovation Budget (of
which): |
172.5 |
201.0 |
- |
- |
- |
| Innovation Promotion & Support |
64.5 |
90.6 |
- |
- |
- |
| Knowledge Transfer & Collaboration |
36.1 |
42.5 |
- |
- |
- |
| Standards, Statutory & Regulatory |
61.2 |
61.6 |
- |
- |
- |
| Sector Challenge |
10.7 |
6.3 |
- |
- |
- |
| |
| Y2K Century Date Change |
14.8 |
0.5 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
| |
| Aeronautics |
19.8 |
19.7 |
- |
- |
- |
| |
| Space (of which): |
87.2 |
89.1 |
- |
- |
- |
| National Space Programme |
11.0 |
25.3 |
- |
- |
- |
| European Space Agency |
76.2 |
63.8 |
- |
- |
- |
| |
| Innovation Expenditure
(of which): |
- |
- |
338.1 |
343 |
345 |
| Industrial Exploitation of Science |
- |
- |
58.3 |
71 |
88 |
| Support for Competitiveness |
- |
- |
87.3 |
81 |
74 |
| Space |
- |
- |
90.0 |
90 |
90 |
| Technical & Design Infrastructure |
- |
- |
76.4 |
76 |
69 |
| Expert Advice & Other Expenditure |
- |
- |
3.8 |
3 |
3 |
| Construction industries |
- |
- |
22.3 |
22 |
21 |
| |
| Smart |
- |
- |
28.0 |
28 |
28 |
| |
| Future & Innovation Unit
(FIU) & Skills |
- |
- |
6.5 |
6 |
6 |
| |
| Non-nuclear Energy (of
which): |
16.3 |
18.1 |
24.3 |
29 |
29 |
| Offshore Oil & Gas |
|
|
|
|
|
| - Industrial/Technology Support |
0.7 |
0.8 |
0.8 |
1 |
1 |
| - Enhanced Oil Recovery |
1.1 |
1.2 |
1.2 |
1 |
1 |
| Renewables |
11.6 |
12.5 |
18.0 |
19 |
19 |
| Clean Coal Technology |
2.9 |
3.6 |
4.3 |
8 |
8 |
| |
| Nuclear Energy (of
which): |
17.9 |
17.9 |
18.3 |
18 |
18 |
| Fusion |
14.4 |
14.3 |
14.3 |
14 |
14 |
| Safety & Acceptability |
3.4 |
3.5 |
4.0 |
4 |
4 |
| |
| OST Administration |
6.6 |
6.8 |
7.0 |
7 |
7 |
| |
| TOTAL DTI S&T EXPENDITURE |
335.1 |
353.1 |
422.2 |
431 |
433 |
| |
| Launch Aid (net) |
-134.5 |
-98.8 |
14.6 |
20 |
147 |
Note 1: The Innovation Budget
has been abolished with effect from 31 March 2001 and some other
lines have moved to reflect the new structure for innovation expenditure.
From 1 April 2001, (i) Aeronautics is included within Industrial
Exploitation of Science; (ii) Space is a single line within Innovation
Expenditure; (iii) Smart, funded by the Small Business Service,
is shown as a separate line (previously included within Innovation
Promotion & Support); (iv) Future & Innovation Unit & Skills is
shown as a separate line (previously included within Innovation
Promotion & Support); and (v) Y2K Century Date Change Programme
was completed by 31 March 2001.
Note 2: Responsibility for
Construction passed to DTI in June 2001 (from the then DETR).
Expenditure on Construction S&T is currently shown as a single
line under Innovation Expenditure, but will later be merged into
the Industrial Exploitation of Science, and Support for Competitiveness
budgets.
Note 3: Figures are shown
on a cash basis up to 31 March 2001 and on a resource basis with
effect from 1 April 2001, following the Department's move to resource
accounting.

Figure 2: DTI Innovation Expenditure
(from April 2001)
| £ million |
2001/2
(resource)
|
2002/3
(resource)
|
2003/4
(resource)
|
Industrial Exploitation of
Science
(includes: CARAD (aeronautics), knowledge transfer, LINK,
international R&D) |
58.3 |
71.2 |
87.8 |
Support for
Competitiveness
(includes: technology transfer, best practice, environmental
technology, UK Online and e-commerce, sponsorship support) |
87.3 |
81.4 |
74.4 |
Space
(includes: national space programme, European Space Agency) |
90.0 |
90.0 |
90.0 |
Technical
& Design Infrastructure
(includes: materials metrology, National Measurement System,
design, standards) |
76.4 |
76.3 |
69.1 |
Expert Advice and other expenditure
(includes: support for consumer safety and residual Sector
Challenge projects) |
3.8 |
2.7 |
2.7 |
| Construction industries |
22.3 |
21.8 |
21.0 |
| TOTAL |
338.1 |
343.4 |
345.0 |
Note 1: This table shows DTI's
innovation activities as re-structured from April 2001. The figures
except for those for construction were first published in DTI
Expenditure Plans Report (Cm 5112), March 2001.
Note 2: Responsibility for
Construction passed to DTI in June 2001 (from the then DETR).
Expenditure on Construction S&T is currently shown as a single
line, but will later be merged into the Industrial Exploitation
of Science, and Support for Competitiveness budgets.
Note 3: Figures are shown
on a resource basis with effect from 1 April 2001, following the
Department's move to resource accounting.

Figure 3: Science Budget allocations
| |
1999-2000
|
2000-01
|
2001-02
|
2002-03
|
2003-04
|
| £million |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Total OST expenditure
on science |
1406.3
|
1603.1
|
1743.3
|
1887.3
|
2132.3
|
| of which:
|
| Biotechnology and
Biological Sciences Research Council (4) |
194.2
|
213.5
|
216.2
|
234.8
|
252.4
|
| Economic and Social
Research Council (4) |
70.9
|
71.8
|
73.6
|
83.0
|
91.7
|
| Engineering and
Physical Sciences Research Council (4) |
404.8
|
413.6
|
441.0
|
466.4
|
494.7
|
| Medical Research
Council (4) |
304.5
|
319.7
|
347.8
|
370.1
|
385.4
|
| Natural Environment
Research Council (4) |
176.7
|
185.4
|
187.9
|
200.4
|
211.8
|
| Particle Physics
and Astronomy Research Council (4) |
186.7
|
205.8
|
206.9
|
221.0
|
232.9
|
| Council for the
Central Laboratory of the Research Councils (4) |
2.0
|
4.1
|
4.3
|
5.0
|
6.9
|
|
|
| Research Councils'
Pensions Scheme |
21.3
|
25.6
|
27.0
|
28.5
|
29.7
|
| Royal Society |
23.9
|
24.6
|
25.9
|
28.7
|
29.2
|
| Royal Academy of
Engineering |
3.7
|
4.0
|
4.3
|
4.8
|
5.3
|
|
|
| DIAMOND Synchrotron |
-
|
4.1
|
20.0
|
20.0
|
20.0
|
| Joint Infrastructure
Fund |
1.6
|
88.1
|
125.0
|
-
|
-
|
| Science Research
Infrastructure Fund |
-
|
-
|
-
|
125.0
|
250.0
|
| Capital Yet to be
allocated |
-
|
0.9
|
-
|
34.0
|
34.0
|
|
|
| Science Enterprise
Challenge Scheme |
13.2
|
15.8
|
-
|
5.0
|
10.0
|
| Cambridge/MIT Institute |
-
|
10.1
|
14.0
|
14.0
|
14.0
|
| University Challenge
Fund (5) |
-
|
0.6
|
-
|
5.0
|
-
|
| Higher Education
Innovation Fund |
-
|
-
|
15.0
|
20.0
|
40.0
|
| Exploitation of
Discoveries at PSREs |
-
|
-
|
6.0
|
-
|
-
|
| Foresight Challenge |
-
|
-
|
-
|
3.0
|
5.0
|
| OST Initiatives |
3.0
|
8.2
|
5.5
|
3.1
|
3.4
|
| Exchange Rate and
Contingency Reserve |
-
|
|
22.8
|
15.5
|
16.0
|
Notes
1. 1999-2000 data
are cash based, and are taken from the Appropriations Accounts
and reflects net grant in aid.
2. 2000-2001 figures,
also cash based, are the net provision in the Spring Supplementary
Estimates and include Joint Research Equipment Initiative (JREI)
and Foresight Link allocations in the Councils' figures.
3. 2001-2002 onwards
figures are resource budgets (excludes EU attributed expenditure)
4. 2001-2002 onwards
figures include JREI
5. A resource provision
of £1,000 will be included in the 2001-2002 Main Estimate for
University Challenge, however, £10 million End Year Flexibility
carried forward from 1999-2000 is to be taken up at the Summer
Supplementary Estimate.
6. Non-voted expenditure
reserved for programmes in 2001-02 through End Year Flexibility
carry over.
Published in DTI Expenditure Plans
Report (Cm 5112), March 2001. See also "The Science Budget 2001/2
to 2003/4", November 2000, at www.dti.gov.uk/ost

FOOTNOTES
1.
As quantified in "SET Statistics 2000: a handbook of science,
engineering and technology indicators" (CM4902), published
November 2000, www.dti.gov.uk/ost/setstats/
2.
See Annex D
3.
"Excellence and Opportunity - a science and innovation policy
for the 21st century" (Cm4814), published July 2000, www.dti.gov.uk/ost/whatsnew
4.
"Opportunity for all in a world of change" - a White
Paper on enterprise, skills and innovation (Cm5052), published
February 2001, www.dti.gov.uk/opportunityforall
5.
The fourth is less directly related, and not included in the strategy
6.
"Guidelines 2000" on scientific advice and policy making,
July 2000, at www.dti.gov.uk/ost/aboutost/guidelines.htm
7.
"Opportunity for all in a world of change" - a White
Paper on enterprise, skills and innovation (Cm5052), published
February 2001, www.dti.gov.uk/opportunityforall
8.
"Rethinking Construction", Sir John Egan's report, July
1998, www.dti.gov.uk/construction
9.
"Building a better quality of life", April 2000, www.dti.gov.uk/construction
10.
www.sbgateway.com
11.
www.businesslink.org
12.
The UK Space Strategy 1999 - 2000: New Frontiers (URN 99/1012)
at www.bnsc.gov.uk
13.
Published by OST in its trans-departmental role "Guidelines
2000 - Scientific Advice and Policy Making", July 2000, at
www.dti.gov.uk/ost/aboutost/guidelines.htm
14.
Government policy on risk assessment was confirmed in its 1999
White Paper "Modernising Government". DTI is a member
of the Interdepartmental Liaison Group on Risk Assessment, chaired
by the Health and Safety Executive, which develops policy on and
promotes the practical application of risk assessment and risk
management.
15.
www.patent.gov.uk
16.
A new consultative body, the Intellectual Property Advisory Committee,
was announced by DTI on 1 August 2001
17.
www.communicationswhitepaper.gov.uk
18.
in particular, the National Physical Laboratory, the National
Egineering Laboratory and the Laboratory of the Government Chemist.
19.
www.foresight.gov.uk
20.
In the case of R&D programmes aimed purely at increasing scientific
knowledge this would be covered by the dissemination requirements
laid down by Research Councils
21.
Rationale, Objectives, Appraisal, Monitoring and Evaluation
22.
The first Modernising Government annual report, Citizens First,
was published on Wednesday 13 September 2000 - www.cabinet-office.gov.uk/moderngov/
23.
Marketing Dept, The Wellcome Trust Tel: 020 7611 8651 - ISBN 1
841290 25 4
24.
"Creating Knowledge, Creating Wealth - realising the economic
potential of public sector research establishments", August
1999, at www.hm-treasury.gov.uk

| index |
|