![]() |
![]() |
| HOC 47/98 | 23 SEPTEMBER 1998 |
| THIS CIRCULAR IS ABOUT: | NEW POWERS FOR YOUTH COURT |
| FROM: | JUVENILE OFFENDERS UNIT |
| EXPIRY DATE | N/A |
| IMPLEMENTATION: | 30 SEPTEMBER 1998 |
| THIS CANCELS HOC: | N/A |
| FOR MORE INFORMATION CONTACT: | PAUL MORRISON
JUVENILE OFFENDERS UNIT HOME OFFICE ROOM 309 50 QUEEN ANNE'S GATE LONDON SW1H 9AT TEL: 020 7 273 2933 |
Introduction
1. The Crime and Disorder Act 1998 (the 1998 Act) contains a number of new provisions to simplify procedures in the youth court to reduce delay in dealing with cases involving children and young people. A number of the measures give effect to recommendations made by the Review of Delay in the Criminal Justice System (the Narey Report); others were proposed in the consultation paper Tackling Delays in the Youth Justice System. The measures were summarised in Chapter 7 of the White Paper No More Excuses: a new approach to tackling youth crime in England and Wales.
2. The new provisions covered by this circular are as follows:
Implementation
4. The Crime and Disorder Act was given Royal Assent on 31 July 1998. The new arrangements set out in this circular will be implemented on 30 September 1998.
i) Remitting cases to the adult magistrates’ court when the defendant turns 18
5. Section 47(1) of the 1998 Act provides
the youth court with a discretionary power to remit a young person to an
adult magistrates’ court for trial, or for sentence, once he or she reaches
the age of 18. The court may use this power at any time before the start
of the trial, or between conviction and sentence. The intention is to allow
the courts to ensure that young people are dealt with in the most appropriate
way, according to their maturity, attitude and offending history, while
avoiding unnecessary delay.
| When it is considered appropriate, the youth court may remit a young person reaching the age of 18 to the adult magistrates’ court for trial, or for sentence. |
6. Section 47(3) of the 1998 Act reverses
the Court of Appeal judgement in the case of R v Khan (1994), in
which it was held that "...save in exceptional circumstances, the youth
court which sends a young person for trial at the Crown Court should postpone
sentence in respect of other, ex hypothesi, less serious offences,
until after the more serious matter has been dealt with." The 1998 Act
removes the presumption that cases should be adjourned for these reasons
alone to avoid any risk of unnecessary delay.
| Where a young person is committed to trial at the Crown Court, the Youth Court need not delay passing sentence for any less serious offences until after the more serious offence has been dealt with. |
7. In November 1996, under the auspices
of the Criminal Justice Consultative Committee, the Magistrates’ Association
and the Justices’ Clerks’ Society issued advice that in the Youth Court,
the requirement to consider the welfare of the individual set out in the
Children and Young Persons Act 1933 may be justification for departing
from the practice of seeking to tie up all outstanding cases against a
defendent and proceeding immediately to sentence, even though other defendents
remained to be tried. The 1998 Act allows the court to deal immediately
with cases in such circumstances, avoiding the risk of unnecessary adjournments,
and consequent delay.
| Sentencing in the youth court need not be delayed to tie up all outstanding cases against a defendant. |
iv) Where the child or young person is committed to the Crown Court on related cases
9. Section 47(6) of the 1998 Act amends
the Magistrates’ Courts Act 1980 in order to provide that, where a youth
court commits a child or young person for trial at the Crown Court for
a grave crime under section 53 of the Children and Young Persons Act 1933,
it may also commit him or her for trial at the same time for any related1
indictable offences. This reduces the scope for delays which had been caused
by the fact that the youth court did not have the power to commit related
charges to the Crown Court and was compelled to await the outcome of the
Crown Court proceedings before dealing with any lesser charges remaining
within its jurisdiction. This measure gives effect to recommendation 32
of the Review of Delay in the Criminal Justice System.
| When a child or young person is committed for trial at the Crown Court for a grave crime, any related offences can be dealt with at the same time. |
v) Removal of the requirement for an hour's interval between adult and youth court hearings
11. Section 47(7) of the 1998 Act amends
the Children and Young Persons Act 1933 to abolish the requirement that
there should be an hour's interval between a magistrates’ court and a youth
court sitting in the same courtroom. The objective of the change is to
reduce inefficiency in the use of court time. However, to protect the young,
section 31 of the Children and Young Persons Act 1933 will continue to
require that juvenile defendants do not associate with adult defendants
whilst awaiting hearing. If the hour's interval is no longer set, courts
will need to provide separate waiting areas when youth courts are in session
to give effect to this requirement. This amendment gives effect to recommendation
33 of the Review of Delay in the Criminal Justice System.
| The requirement to delay for an hour between the sitting of the adult magistrates’ court and the youth court is abolished. |
12. Section 48 of the 1998 Act amends Schedule
2 to the Children and Young Persons Act 1933 to enable metropolitan stipendiary
magistrates - those sitting in Inner London or the City of London - to
sit alone in the youth court. An amendment to the Youth Court (Constitution)
Rules 1954 makes an equivalent provision for provincial stipendiary magistrates.
The intention of these measures is to remove the current restrictions on
the role played by stipendiary magistrates in the youth court. However,
those youth courts served exclusively by lay magistrates will be unaffected.
This measure gives effect to recommendation 31 of the Review of Delay
in the Criminal Justice System and may be used, where appropriate,
to ensure that delay is kept to a minimum. For example, in necessarily
lengthy trials where the availability of lay magistrates may unnecessarily
prolong proceedings.
| Stipendiary magistrates may sit alone in the youth court. |
13. Enquiries relating to this circular should be addressed to Paul Morrison, Juvenile Offenders Unit, Home Office, Room 309, Queen Anne's Gate, SW1H 9AT (020 7 273 2933).
Crime and Disorder Act front page