This snapshot, taken on 01/03/2005, shows web content selected for preservation by The National Archives. External links, forms and search boxes may not work in archived websites.
 
Home Office
Crime - Let's bring it Down
 
THE CRIME AND DISORDER ACT


 
HOC 47/98 23 SEPTEMBER 1998
THIS CIRCULAR IS ABOUT: NEW POWERS FOR YOUTH COURT
FROM: JUVENILE OFFENDERS UNIT
EXPIRY DATE N/A
IMPLEMENTATION: 30 SEPTEMBER 1998
THIS CANCELS HOC: N/A
FOR MORE INFORMATION CONTACT: PAUL MORRISON 
JUVENILE OFFENDERS UNIT 
HOME OFFICE 
ROOM 309 
50 QUEEN ANNE'S GATE 
LONDON SW1H 9AT 

TEL: 020 7 273 2933

 
NEW POWERS FOR YOUTH COURTS

Introduction

1. The Crime and Disorder Act 1998 (the 1998 Act) contains a number of new provisions to simplify procedures in the youth court to reduce delay in dealing with cases involving children and young people. A number of the measures give effect to recommendations made by the Review of Delay in the Criminal Justice System (the Narey Report); others were proposed in the consultation paper Tackling Delays in the Youth Justice System. The measures were summarised in Chapter 7 of the White Paper No More Excuses: a new approach to tackling youth crime in England and Wales.

2. The new provisions covered by this circular are as follows:

3. This circular has been prepared to provide information to magistrates and justices’ clerks on the implementation of the new arrangements.

Implementation

4. The Crime and Disorder Act was given Royal Assent on 31 July 1998. The new arrangements set out in this circular will be implemented on 30 September 1998.

i) Remitting cases to the adult magistrates’ court when the defendant turns 18

5. Section 47(1) of the 1998 Act provides the youth court with a discretionary power to remit a young person to an adult magistrates’ court for trial, or for sentence, once he or she reaches the age of 18. The court may use this power at any time before the start of the trial, or between conviction and sentence. The intention is to allow the courts to ensure that young people are dealt with in the most appropriate way, according to their maturity, attitude and offending history, while avoiding unnecessary delay.
 

When it is considered appropriate, the youth court may remit a young person reaching the age of 18 to the adult magistrates’ court for trial, or for sentence.
 
ii) Where a child or young person is committed for trial on related, and unrelated matters, to the Crown Court

6. Section 47(3) of the 1998 Act reverses the Court of Appeal judgement in the case of R v Khan (1994), in which it was held that "...save in exceptional circumstances, the youth court which sends a young person for trial at the Crown Court should postpone sentence in respect of other, ex hypothesi, less serious offences, until after the more serious matter has been dealt with." The 1998 Act removes the presumption that cases should be adjourned for these reasons alone to avoid any risk of unnecessary delay.
 

Where a young person is committed to trial at the Crown Court, the Youth Court need not delay passing sentence for any less serious offences until after the more serious offence has been dealt with.
  
iii) Where a child or young person is charged with other unrelated offences

7. In November 1996, under the auspices of the Criminal Justice Consultative Committee, the Magistrates’ Association and the Justices’ Clerks’ Society issued advice that in the Youth Court, the requirement to consider the welfare of the individual set out in the Children and Young Persons Act 1933 may be justification for departing from the practice of seeking to tie up all outstanding cases against a defendent and proceeding immediately to sentence, even though other defendents remained to be tried. The 1998 Act allows the court to deal immediately with cases in such circumstances, avoiding the risk of unnecessary adjournments, and consequent delay.
 

Sentencing in the youth court need not be delayed to tie up all outstanding cases against a defendant.
 
8. The new arrangements described at ii) and iii) above do not limit the scope of magistrates to adjourn cases, but remove the requirement that they must adjourn cases in the circumstances described above. The decision to adjourn cases in all circumstances remains at the magistrates’ discretion, and the magistrate will wish to have regard to the benefit that a reduction in delay will bring to children and young people, and to the principal aim of the youth justice system. Of relevance to this decision will be the advice contained in the 1997 inter-departmental circular Tackling delays in the Youth Justice System on reducing the number of adjournments.

iv) Where the child or young person is committed to the Crown Court on related cases

9. Section 47(6) of the 1998 Act amends the Magistrates’ Courts Act 1980 in order to provide that, where a youth court commits a child or young person for trial at the Crown Court for a grave crime under section 53 of the Children and Young Persons Act 1933, it may also commit him or her for trial at the same time for any related1 indictable offences. This reduces the scope for delays which had been caused by the fact that the youth court did not have the power to commit related charges to the Crown Court and was compelled to await the outcome of the Crown Court proceedings before dealing with any lesser charges remaining within its jurisdiction. This measure gives effect to recommendation 32 of the Review of Delay in the Criminal Justice System.
 

When a child or young person is committed for trial at the Crown Court for a grave crime, any related offences can be dealt with at the same time.
 
10. Taken together the provisions described at ii) iii) and iv) will ensure that, where a case is committed to the Crown Court for trial, related cases are committed at the same time and unrelated cases are dealt with in the youth court without delay.

v) Removal of the requirement for an hour's interval between adult and youth court hearings

11. Section 47(7) of the 1998 Act amends the Children and Young Persons Act 1933 to abolish the requirement that there should be an hour's interval between a magistrates’ court and a youth court sitting in the same courtroom. The objective of the change is to reduce inefficiency in the use of court time. However, to protect the young, section 31 of the Children and Young Persons Act 1933 will continue to require that juvenile defendants do not associate with adult defendants whilst awaiting hearing. If the hour's interval is no longer set, courts will need to provide separate waiting areas when youth courts are in session to give effect to this requirement. This amendment gives effect to recommendation 33 of the Review of Delay in the Criminal Justice System.
 

The requirement to delay for an hour between the sitting of the adult magistrates’ court and the youth court is abolished.
 
vi) Enabling stipendiary magistrates to sit alone in youth courts

12. Section 48 of the 1998 Act amends Schedule 2 to the Children and Young Persons Act 1933 to enable metropolitan stipendiary magistrates - those sitting in Inner London or the City of London - to sit alone in the youth court. An amendment to the Youth Court (Constitution) Rules 1954 makes an equivalent provision for provincial stipendiary magistrates. The intention of these measures is to remove the current restrictions on the role played by stipendiary magistrates in the youth court. However, those youth courts served exclusively by lay magistrates will be unaffected. This measure gives effect to recommendation 31 of the Review of Delay in the Criminal Justice System and may be used, where appropriate, to ensure that delay is kept to a minimum. For example, in necessarily lengthy trials where the availability of lay magistrates may unnecessarily prolong proceedings.
 

Stipendiary magistrates may sit alone in the youth court.
 
Enquiries

13. Enquiries relating to this circular should be addressed to Paul Morrison, Juvenile Offenders Unit, Home Office, Room 309, Queen Anne's Gate, SW1H 9AT (020 7 273 2933). 



1The definition of "related" for this purpose is whether the offences could be joined in the same indictment. This reflects the existing definition of a related indictable offence in section 38A of the Magistrates' Courts Act 1980. The current test is whether the offences are founded on the same facts or form or are part of a series of offences of the same or similar character.


Links to Other Home Office Circulars

Crime and Disorder Act front page

Home Office front page



 © Crown Copyright 1998
Updated 8th March 1999