• Skip Navigation
• Help |
• Contact us |
• Access keys |
• Site map |
• A-Z

Independent reviews

Home >  Independent reviews >  Barker Review of Land Use Planning > Responses to the Call for Evidence (A-M)

• Home 
• Budget 
• Pre-Budget Report 
• Spending Review 

• Newsroom & speeches 
• Economic data & tools 
• Consultations & legislation 
• Independent reviews 
• • Barker Review of Land Use Planning  
  • Caio review of barriers to investment in next generation access  
  • Cave Review: competition and innovation in water markets  
  • Challenges and opportunities in identity assurance  
  • Cooksey Review  
  • Gowers Review of Intellectual Property  
  • Independent Audit of Spectrum Holdings (external website)  
  • Leitch Review of Skills  
  • Lyons Inquiry final report and recommendations  
  • Pomeroy Review of Christmas saving schemes  
  • Previously-published independent reviews  
  • Sainsbury Review of Science and Innovation  
  • Sir David Varney's Review of Tax Policy in Northern Ireland  
  • Sir David Varney's Review of the Competitiveness of Northern Ireland  
  • Stern Review on the Economics of Climate Change  
  • The Cox Review of Creativity in Business  
  • The Davidson Review on Implementation of EU legislation  
  • The Eddington Transport Study (DfT website)  
  • The Hampton Review  
  • The King Review of low-carbon cars  
  • The Poynter Review  
  • Thoresen Review of Generic Financial Advice  
  • UK Stem Cell Initiative  
  • Accelerating the SME economic engine: through transparent, simple and strategic procurement  
  • British Offshore Financial Centres  
  • Review of corporate governance of UK banking industry  

• Enterprise & productivity 
• Financial services 
• International issues 
• Public private partnerships 
• Public spending & reporting 
• Taxation, work and welfare 
• UK economy 
• The Euro 
• Invest to save budget (ISB) 

• About us 
• Careers 
• Other HMT sites 

Responses to the Call for Evidence (A-M)

The responses to the Barker Review of Land Use Planning are available in Adobe Acrobat Portable Document Format (PDF). If you do not have Adobe Acrobat installed on your computer you can download the software from the Adobe website. For alternative ways to read PDF documents visit the HM Treasury accessibility page.

Internal links

A - M

• PDF file of response from Accessible Retail
• PDF file of response from Advantage West Midlands
• PDF file of response from Aggregate Industries
• PDF file of response from Arnold Whites Estate Ltd
• PDF file of response from Association London Government
• PDF file of response from Association of British Insurers
• PDF file of response from Association of Consultant Architects
• PDF file of response from Association of Convenience Stores
• PDF file of response from AUDE University of Essex Estate Management Section
• PDF file of response from B&Q
• PDF file of response from BAA
• PDF file of response from Balfour Beatty
• PDF file of response from Barratt
• PDF file of response from Bedfordshire Councils Planning Consortium
• PDF file of response from Biffa
• PDF file of response from Birmingham City Council
• PDF file of response from Bond Pearce LLP
• PDF file of response from Boots
• PDF file of response from Bourne Leisure
• PDF file of response from Bradford Chamber of Commerce
• PDF file of response from Brethren Gospel Trust
• PDF file of response from Brighton & Hove City Council
• PDF file of response from Bristol Port Company
• PDF file of response from British Aggregates Association
• PDF file of response from British Chambers of Commerce
• PDF file of response from British Energy
• PDF file of response from British Holiday & Home Parks Association
• PDF file of response from British Land Company Plc
• PDF file of response from British Property Federation
• PDF file of response from British Retail consortium
• PDF file of response from British Urban Regeneration Association
• PDF file of response from British Wind Energy
• PDF file of response from Business in Sport & Leisure
• PDF file of response from Cambridgeshire County Council
• PDF file of response from Campaign to Protect Rural England (CPRE)
• PDF file of response from Canary Wharf
• PDF file of response from Capital Shopping Centres
• PDF file of response from Cardiff University
• PDF file of response from CBI
• PDF file of response from Centrica
• PDF file of response from Chartered Institute of Housing
• PDF file of response from Chartered Institution of Water and Environmental Management
• PDF file of response from Cherwell District Council
• PDF file of response from Chester Civic Trust
• PDF file of response from Church Commissioners for England
• PDF file of response from City of London Law Society
• PDF file of response from Civic Mediation Council
• PDF file of response from Commission for Architecture and the Built Environment
• PDF file of response from Construction Products Association
• PDF file of response from Country Land & business Association
• PDF file of response from County Surveyor Society
• PDF file of response from Cranfield Parish Council
• PDF file of response from Dartmoor National Park Authority
• PDF file of response from Dorset County Council
• PDF file of response from E.on UK
• PDF file of response from East Midlands Regional Development Agency
• PDF file of response from East Sussex County Council
• PDF file of response from Emerson Group
• PDF file of response from Energy Saving Trust
• PDF file of response from England Regional Development Agency
• PDF file of response from English Heritage
• PDF file of response from English Heritage Association
• PDF file of Local Government Archaeological Officers
• PDF file of response from English Historic Towns Forum
• PDF file of response from English National Parks
• PDF file of response from English Nature
• PDF file of response from Environmental Agency
• PDF file of response from Essex County Council
• PDF file of response from the Forestry Commission
• PDF file of response from Freight Transport Association
• PDF file of response from Friends of the earth
• PDF file of response from Gamesa Energy UK
• PDF file of response from Greater London Authority Economics response
• PDF file of response from Greater London Authority Mayors response
• PDF file of response from Green Issues Communications
• PDF file of response from Hampshire and Isle of Wight Chief Planning Officers Group
• PDF file of response from Hampshire County Council
• PDF file of response from Heritage Link
• PDF file of response from Historic Houses Association
• PDF file of response from Home Builders Federation
• PDF file of response from Horticulture Trades Association
• PDF file of response from House Builders Association
• PDF file of response from Housing Corporation
• PDF file of response from IKEA
• PDF file of response from Institute of Directors
• PDF file of response from Institute of Historic Building conservation
• PDF file of response from John Lewis
• PDF file of response from Kingsley Smith Solicitors
• PDF file of response from Lambert & Foster
• PDF file of response from Land Securities
• PDF file of response from Landscape Institute
• PDF file of response from LaSalle Investment Management
• PDF file of response from Lawrence Graham LLP Solicitors
• PDF file of response from Live/work Network
• PDF file of response from London Borough of Croydon
• PDF file of response from London Borough of Hackney
• PDF file of response from London First
• PDF file of response from London Green Belt Council
• PDF file of response from Manchester City council
• PDF file of response from Marks & Spencer
• PDF file of response from Mayfair Chambers
• PDF file of response from Merseyside Travel
• PDF file of response from Miller Homes Ltd
• PDF file of response from Mitchell´s & Butlers
• PDF file of response from Mobile Operators Association

Back to top

• Terms & conditions
• RSS Feed
• 
•