This snapshot taken on 14/02/2006, shows web content selected for preservation by The National Archives. External links, forms and search boxes may not work in archived websites.
DTI Home
Department of Trade and Industry
SearchSearchHome
 

Text only


Welsh version
 
 

PUBLIC CONSULTATION ON COMMISSION PROPOSAL FOR A DIRECTIVE ON THE WORKING CONDITIONS OF TEMPORARY (AGENCY) WORKERS

Following the break down of social partner negotiations on a framework agreement on temporary agency work (TAW) in May 2001, the European Commission had been working on a proposal for a directive on TAW. The Commission published its proposal on 20 March 2002. It has the broad aim of improving the quality of TAW by requiring that temporary agency workers be treated no less favourably than comparable permanent workers in the user enterprise to which the temporary worker is assigned. It also aims to establish a European framework for the use of TAW.

The purpose of this document is to give interested parties an opportunity to comment on the Commission proposal. The proposal is now being considered by the Council of Ministers (of which the UK, like all other EU member states, is a member) and the European Parliament. In particular the government is interested in what temporary work agencies, employers and agency workers and those representing them believe the impact of the proposal will be on temporary agency work in the UK. This information can contribute to an assessment of the likely effects of the proposal on the UK labour market.

A brief summary of the main requirements of the Commission proposal and a summary of the Regulatory Impact Assessment (RIA) on the draft proposal are contained in this document. You may wish to study the proposal itself or read the Explanatory Memorandum pdf (16Kb) and full RIA pdf (102Kb) on the proposal.

The proposal is subject to the co-decision procedure – that is, it must be agreed by the Council of Ministers and the European Parliament if it is to become law. If the proposal is accepted as a directive, then a transposition date will be set which would give member states, including the UK, a certain period of time (usually at least 2 years) to pass appropriate legislation.

Your response to this consultation document may be made publicly available in whole or in part at the Department's discretion. If you do not wish any of your response (including your identity) to be made public, you must state in the response which parts you wish us to keep confidential. Where confidentiality is not requested, responses may be made available to any enquirer or published by any means.

A Welsh language version of this consultation paper is available and we can provide large print and taped versions too – please contact Anita Thomas if you need these.

Comments on the Commission proposal should be sent as soon as possible and no later than 18 October 2002 to:

Anita Thomas                                                   E-mail: Anita.Thomas@dti.gsi.gov.uk

Department of Trade and Industry                       

UG82, Europe and Flexibility Branch

Employment Relations Directorate

1 Victoria Street

London SW1H 0ET

 

The Commission proposal

The proposal takes a similar approach to existing directives, negotiated by the EU Social Partners, on Part-Time Work and Fixed-Term Work. The stated aims of the proposal are to improve the quality of temporary agency work by applying an equal treatment principle to temporary agency workers and to establish a suitable framework for the use of temporary agency work in the EU. It applies to workers employed by temporary work agencies and posted to client companies to work under the supervision of those client companies.

The main requirements of the proposal are that: 

  • An agency worker assigned to work under the control of a client company should not be given less favourable basic employment conditions than a similar permanent worker in that client company, unless this is objectively justified.

  • The basic employment conditions set out in the directive are: the duration of working time, rest periods, night work, paid holidays and public holidays; pay1; work done by pregnant women and nursing mothers, children and young people; and action taken to combat discrimination on the grounds of sex, race or ethnic origin, religion or beliefs, disabilities, age or sexual orientation.

  • Member states can chose not to apply this equal treatment requirement where temporary agency workers are employed on permanent contracts (these would be where temporary agency workers are paid by the agency in between assignments), where temporary agency workers are covered by collective agreements, or where temporary agency workers’ assignments can be accomplished in six weeks or less.

  • Member states should periodically review restrictions on the use of temporary agency workers and take specified measures to make it easier for them to find permanent jobs.

  • User companies should give agency workers access to ‘social services’ provided to permanent workers.

  • Agency workers should be informed of permanent vacancies in the user company.

  • Clauses banning or having the effect of preventing the conclusion of contracts between an agency worker and a user company at the end of the worker’s assignment should be null and void.

  • Companies using agency workers would need to provide information on the use of TAW when providing information on the employment situation in the company to worker information and consultation bodies.

 
Agency Work in the UK

In the UK there are estimated to be 700 000 agency workers on temporary assignments at any given time, i.e. around 2.8% of the workforce. Agency work has been in existence since the beginning of the last century and is regulated by the Employment Agencies Act 1973 and the Conduct of Employment Agencies and Employment Businesses Regulations 1976 (which are currently under review). These are enforced by the DTI’s Employment Agency Standards Inspectorate. In addition, certain basic employment rights such as the national minimum wage, working time regulations and health and safety legislation have been specifically applied to agency workers and other statutory rights may apply, depending on the nature of the relationship between the agency and the worker.

The Commission proposal would require significant changes to the current UK legislation, principally to incorporate the non-discrimination obligation. At present the pay and conditions of agency workers are set by the agency according to market principles or collective agreements, generally without reference to conditions in the enterprise to which they are temporarily assigned.

The Commission argues that the directive would improve the working conditions of agency workers and therefore increase the supply of agency workers. The Government is concerned that the directive should not cause a decrease in demand for agency workers, with negative consequences both for agency workers and user enterprises in terms of employment opportunities and flexibility in the labour market. Agency work can provide a useful way into the labour market, particularly permanent jobs, for workers. It can increase labour market flexibility in ways which benefit both business and workers. It can also offer workers who want to control or vary their patterns of work greater choice than permanent work. The present UK regulatory framework offers a balance between flexibility and protection for agency workers, which the Government would wish to ensure the proposed directive is broadly compatible with.

We are therefore seeking views, particularly from temporary agency workers, agencies, employers and associations representing employers and workers on the impact the proposals might have on the use and availability of temporary agency work in the UK. When giving us your views, please indicate whether you represent agency workers, agencies, employers or others. In particular, we would welcome:

  • Views on and evidence of the impact of the proposals on the UK labour market as a whole;

  • Evidence of the likely impact of the proposals on employment rates, opportunities for work seekers and the working conditions of agency workers;

  • Views on and evidence of their impact on current UK practice, including examples or case studies if possible.

  • Any evidence of problems with temporary agency work in the UK

  • Views on whether there are any alternatives to regulation that would satisfactorily meet the objectives of the directive or any other perceived problems with temporary agency work.

 

Employment Relations Directorate

Europe and Flexibility Branch

DTI

 

Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the Working Conditions for Temporary (Agency) Workers — Regulatory Impact Assessment (RIA).

Summary2
 

Issue
The economic impact of the proposed EU Directive on working conditions for temporary agency workers.

 

Objectives
The Commission’s proposal is motivated by a concern that temporary agency workers may be less favourably treated than their permanent or fixed-term comparators.

 

The specific aims of the proposal are twofold:

  • to improve the quality of temporary agency work by applying the principle of non discrimination.

  • to establish a suitable framework for the use of temporary agency work to contribute to the smooth functioning of the labour market.

Numbers Affected
We estimate that about 700,000 people are working as temporary agency workers at any particular time in the UK.

Potential Labour Market Effects of the Directive        

  • The proposed Directive may result in better pay and other employment conditions for agency workers, depending on their individual circumstances and the precise terms of the Directive.

  • Therefore, more people may enter the labour market as agency workers, due to improved employment conditions.

  • But user enterprises could decrease their demand for agency workers, if agencies pass some of their higher costs onto user enterprises in the form of higher fees.

  • However, some user enterprises make an active choice to use temporary agency workers to maintain workplace flexibility, which may dampen the decrease in demand despite the higher cost of agency workers.

  • These demand and supply side effects may have flexibility implications.

  • We cannot quantify these effects and therefore cannot predict the overall effect on the labour market for agency workers. We would welcome further evidence of the likely effects.

Benefits3
We estimate that between 210,000 and 290,000 agency workers could benefit from the Directive through the following:

  • Non-discrimination in pay could benefit agency workers by between £164m and £226m per year4.

  • The financial benefit to agency workers of improved access to training is estimated to be between £21m and £29m per year5.

  • Likewise, it is estimated that training could lead to improved productivity for user enterprises at a value of between £98m and £272m per year.

  • It is estimated that 335 user enterprises could make savings of about £2.8m per year in total through improvements in vacancy filling.

  • It is estimated that agencies may receive between £21m and £45m per year in revenue from improved vacancy filling, if the proposed Directive were to increase the attractiveness of temporary agency work.

  • There are benefits to the taxpayer of between £41m and £57m per year from higher tax incomes and national insurance contributions on higher agency worker pay.

There may be other benefits, such as greater job security for agency workers and an increase in the attractiveness of agency work, that are difficult to quantify.

Costs
We estimate the total costs of the Directive as follows:

  • Non-discrimination in pay would cost agencies between £43m and £118m per year6.

  • The estimated increase in training costs to agencies might be between £2m and £6m per year, and to user enterprises of between £11m and £15m per year.

  • Losses in temp-to-perm transfer fee revenue is estimated to be between £35m and £70m per year, or 1%-3% of annual industry turnover7.

  • It is estimated that user enterprises would face higher fees due to cost pass-on from agencies of between £239m and £387m per year.

  • Employers would face a total of £0.8m from additional Employment Tribunal applications.

  • The Employment Tribunal Service would face an additional £0.2m from applications.

  • Agencies would face a one-off administrative cost of between £1.4m and £3.2m.

There may be other costs that are difficult to quantify, such as an increased turnover of agency workers, the crowding-out of permanent job opportunities, and greater job insecurity for permanent workers who work alongside agency workers.

Small businesses
The private employment agency industry in the UK is made up predominantly of small firms, therefore it is possible that the Directive may affect smaller agencies to a relatively greater extent than larger agencies. However, small agencies only make up about 1.5 % of small firms in the UK, therefore the effect on the small business sector as a whole will not be large. The users of agencies are disproportionately larger firms, therefore small firms would be affected to a relatively lesser extent by any cost increases.


1 The UK Government takes the view that, due to the exclusion in article 137(6) of the Treaty, the proposal cannot cover pay, due to its legal base. See the Government’s explanatory memorandum on the proposal.

2 A full version of this RIA pdf (102Kb) is available on the DTI website

3 For most of the measures proposed in the Directive, it is not possible to quantify costs and benefits.

4 This assumes that the Directive can cover pay. There is a question as to whether this is permitted by the Treaty (see Article 137(6)).

5 This assumes that Article 6.5 of the proposed Directive’s effect, in practice, would be that agency workers received the same amount of training as their comparators.

6 We estimate that between 20%-40% of agencies’ higher costs are not passed on to user enterprises.

7 It is possible that Article 6.2 of the Directive might prohibit or limit the use of ‘temp-to-perm’ fees.

 

 

Employment Relations home page  |  Search  |  Crown Copyright  |  Disclaimer
Top of page

Last updated 24 July 2002