This snapshot, taken on 02/09/2009, shows web content selected for preservation by The National Archives. External links, forms and search boxes may not work in archived websites.
Department for Business, Innovation and Skills logo

Looking further afield for specialist Scientific Advice and Evidence

  • Science Reviews[1] [2] are an important quality assurance mechanism available to the GCSA[3]; in 2008 there has been an anticipated[4] independent review of this policy instrument after five years.
  • The Guidelines(40 KB)(40 KB) apply best practice for the natural sciences to contribute alongside all analytical disciplines to ensure the full range of relevant expertise is made available from internal and external resources. Standards of propriety should also be adhered to[5].

Scientific Advisory Committees (SACs) are an important source of expert independent advice[6] on significant policy issues and are the subject of a comprehensive Code of Practice(2 MB)(2 MB)(2 MB) (CoPSAC) revised in December 2007.

  • The advice contained covers: Role and remit, including options for reporting into departments; membership, recruitment and cooption; ethical issues and working practices; chairmanship; role of the Secretariat; remuneration; transparency and publication policies; and reporting on risk and uncertainty.
  • CoPSAC(2 MB)(2 MB)(2 MB) includes three core policy references - the Universal Ethical Code(107 KB)(107 KB)[7], the Seven Principles of Public Life (Nolan Principles)[8] and the Six Consultation Criteria(188 KB)[9].
  • PDF this page
  • Print this page
  • RSS