This snapshot, taken on 03/08/2004, shows web content selected for preservation by The National Archives. External links, forms and search boxes may not work in archived websites.

Evaluating Impact - Education Research Paper No. 35, 1999, 262 p.

[Previous Page] [Table of Contents] [Next Page]

5. TRAINING TEACHERS AS RESEARCHERS

5.1 Helping teachers to develop competence criteria for evaluating their professional development
5.2 Combining the teaching of research methods with an assessment of project impact

5.1 Helping teachers to develop competence criteria for evaluating their professional development

Alan Peacock
School of Education
University of Exeter


Alan Peacock's paper discusses ways of helping teachers to develop competence criteria for evaluating their professional development. He discusses interventions in South Africa and Sri Lanka in which teachers collaboratively developed competence criteria for evaluating their professional development and improving their performance. He elucidates various stages of the process through which detailed sets of criteria are developed. In the final stage outlined in this paper, he shows how the training is put to practice in their classroom situation. He argues that the reflection underlying this process enabled teachers to become aware of the need to establish levels of achievement in any given skill area. In practice this means that teachers are given the responsibility to develop their own competence, and this has a number of positive spin-offs for teaching practice. The paper includes details about teaching and skills indicators which have been developed by teachers, as well as an observation schedule which is used for monitoring the progress of teaching.


1 Introduction

The paper draws from our experience in three current projects which are supported by the University of Exeter School of Education. These are:

· The Primary Science Programme in Madadeni District, Kwazulu-Natal, South Africa1

· The Sri Pada College of Education Project, in Sri Lanka2

· The Limpopo School Empowerment Project, in the Tshakuma District, Northern Province, South Africa3

In each of the above projects, the primary aim was to enhance the capacity of teachers (or teacher trainers) to evaluate their performance through the development of criteria of effectiveness or competence. The underlying rationale for participation in each of the three projects relates to notions of transfer of responsibility, empowerment, collaboration, relevance and communicative effectiveness (Fullan 1989; Dalin 1994; Shaeffer 1994; Good & Brophy 1995; Showers & Joyce 1996). Over the past seven years, Exeter in partnership with local teachers, developed sets of criteria of teaching competence.

The criteria which we developed collaboratively reflect teachers' competencies in the following areas:

· Planning
· Communicating
· Managing
· Evaluating

Detailed criteria, calibrated into four levels of competencies, were generated for each of the above-mentioned areas. The four levels of competence coincide with the four stages of the initial training of teachers. The following is a summary of The Dimensions of Teaching from the University of Exeter (1997).

The Dimensions of Teaching

Dimension

Level 1

Level 2

Level 3

Level 4

Planning


Plans episodes for a group showing

· aims for learning

· organisation

· relevant subject knowledge

· teacher's role
· resources.

Plan lessons for a class, showing

· clear appropriate aims and expectations for learning

· appropriate subject matter knowledge, related to the National Curriculum (N C) programmes of study

· means of differentiation

· practical organisation for teaching and learning

· deployment of resources

Plan a short programme of work for a class, showing:

· clear objectives and content which is appropriate to the subject and the pupils

· interesting and challenging tasks, including homework where appropriate

· clear targets, building on prior attainment (by using assessment data)

· clear differentiation, with identification of pupils with Special Educational Needs (SEN)

· attention to cross-curricular skills, and pupils' broader development

· an appropriate use of the whole class groups and individual teaching

· detailed attention to own progress as a teacher.

Plan schemes of work for a class, showing:

· a balanced development of children's knowledge, understanding and skills

· assessment strategies

· imaginative activities and resources

· a clear relation to developing class ethos

· attention to own developing practice.

Communicating

(a) Demonstration and instruction

· Attract children's interest and attention.

· Give clear, audible instructions.

· Inform, describe and explain.

· Sustain children's attention.

· Demonstrate skills and processes clearly.

· Inform, describe & explain with clarity and coherence.

· Ask question to focus attention.

· Convey interest and enthusiasm.

· Adapt instruction to pupils' understanding and engagement.

· Ensure engagement and participation with good pacing of lessons.

· Demonstrate with clear commentary.

· Show good awareness of audience. Summarise clearly and concisely, emphasising key ideas.

· Use effective questioning to ensure participation.

· Use appropriate vocabulary.

· Choose concepts and examples strategically (with a deep knowledge of subject matter and children's interests and understanding in mind).

· Communication so as to inspire pupils' interest in subject.

(b) Interaction

· Engage in interaction.

· Listen and respond sympathetically.

· Check understanding via questions.

Interact and question so as to:

· listen carefully to pupils

· focus pupils' ideas

· sustain their thinking

· prompt them to check errors

· respond to individual differences

Mediate learning through discussion so as to:

· help to remedy pupils' misconceptions

· stimulate intellectual curiosity

· explore ideas, giving attention to pupils' boarder development

· prompt reasoning and argument

· relate learning to authentic and work related examples.

· Foster democratic procedures and rational discussion.

· Chair discussions effectively whilst remaining neutral.

· Show sensitivity and judgement about contentious issues.

· Defend individuals from unfair peer pressures.

(c) Facilitation

· Monitor practice tasks, checking accuracy and providing help.

Initiate some independent practice and problem-solving.

· Provide feedback to support independent learning.

· Exploit opportunities to improve basic skills and study skills.

· Encourage some autonomy in pupil choices of the means of ends of learning.

· Facilitate knowledge use in pupil-led investigation.

· Facilitate pupils' individual and collaborative study skills.

· Promote authentic activities and the development of autonomous learning.

· Facilitates pupils' independent attempts at research.

Managing

(a) Managing order

· Operate established procedures for order with a group.

· Attempt to sustain purposeful work.

· Deal with minor misbehaviours.

· Communicate assertively to gain attention.

· Maintaining a good working atmosphere.

· Operate a framework of rules consistently.

· Give due attention to issues of safety and pupil welfare.

· Signal and manage transitions effectively.

· Draw on support where appropriate.

· Manage and sustain a flow of work and activities effectively.

· Detect problems of order early meet them with firmness.

· Set and maintain agreed rules and values.

· Set high expectations for pupils' behaviour.

· Attempt to assimilate difficult children.

· Maintain and improve order by purposeful work and shared values.

· Involve children appropriately in taking responsibility.

· Work systematically with difficult children to improve their learning and adjustment to life in school.

(b) Managing resources

· Provide and manage materials for a group.

· Display work (after advice).

· Organise tidying of the classroom.

· Provide appropriate resources for lessons.

· Managing the distribution and collection of materials effectively.

· Display pupils' work effectively.

· Ensure care of resources and safe environment.

· Arrange appropriate seating.

· Make use of visual aids.

· Make effective use of time.

· Select and make good use of textbooks, IT and other learning resources.

· Work or improving the learning environment.

· Use displays to stimulate learning.

· Manage own and pupils use of time effectively.

· Use adult assistants effectively.

· Develop and experiment with new resources.

· Design, produce and use novel curriculum materials.

· Sustain long-term resourcing for class, or subject.

· Encourage pupils to manage resources independently.

· Develop the effectiveness of adult assistants.

Evaluating


· Show awareness of children's engagement work.

· Mark children's work (with advice).

· Write summary evaluations of episodes of teaching.

· Assess work in relation to objectives and NC (with help).

· Use observations and questioning to asses understanding.

· Diagnose problems and provide feedback.

· Relate assessment to future planning and teaching.

· Keep records of pupils' work.

· Write evaluation using, for example, agendas, conferences and university based-work.

· Use a variety of formal and informal assessment techniques.

· Mark and monitor pupils' class and homework.

· Provide constructive feedback and set targets.

· Assess and record each pupil's progress systematically, using NC levels, school records and comparative data to inform planning and teaching.

· Be familiar with statutory assessment and reporting requirements.

· Know how to prepare and present reports to parents.

· Identify and assess SEN in line with relevant codes of practice.

· Demonstrate awareness of own development as a teacher.

· Consider alternative analyses of teaching and learning.

· Assess pupils' progress critically and effectively.

· Take part in staff development programmes.

· Undertake research in to own professional practice.

· Develop own theoretical and practical ideas.


2 Stages in developing competence criteria

The process through which the The Dimensions of Teaching went was a lengthy one and it took several years and numerous trial versions before a pro forma which satisfied all partners in the process was agreed upon.4 In each case, teachers participated in the generation of the criteria. They engaged in a process which was characterised by the following four stages:


1. Identification

Participants identified their perceived needs or the competencies which related to their required roles. The participants in this stage included teachers, teacher trainers, and leader teachers.


2. Categorisation

Participants categorised or classified identified criteria for evaluation under specific category headings.


3. Revision

Participants refined criteria in order to ensure that they would be utilisable when incorporated into the instrument or working tool. This is done by

· making statements operationalisable
· identifying relevant evidence
· categorising and establishing levels of competence.


4. Utilisation

Participants evaluated tools within an ongoing programme of classroom support.


The first three stages of this process of development are conducted in the early stages of a project, usually during workshop sessions in which all teachers, trainers and leader teachers participate. We realised that it would be far more cost effective for us merely to present the Exeter Dimensions of teaching as a model or template. If we had done that we could have (by eliminating the first three stages) shortened the time which teachers need to generate their own criteria. While this would certainly have allowed Exeter to capitalise on the effort and expense which went into their original development, it would not have permitted teachers to generate (and therefore 'own') those competencies which are relevant to their own distinctive cultural/pedagogical contexts. The 'handing down' of externally developed criteria would deny teachers the opportunity to participate. in the stages which are necessary for their own professional development. In fact, we believe that the process of defining notions of effective teaching (stage 1) and the consequential collaborative development of the competence criteria (stages 2 and 3) are crucial stages for enabling teachers' professional development. The only role that project leaders or consultants should play in these initial phases is one involving the facilitation and scaffolding of workshop processes (Tharp 1993; Good & Brophy 1995).

2.1 Stage 1: Initiation of the process of identifying competencies

The following list describes four ways of initiating the process of identification of competencies in stage 1:

· Teachers can initially be asked questions like What is literacy? What is science? How can you build onto pupils experiences? What makes a good teacher of mathematics?

· Facilitators can provide examples of good classroom practice by using, for example, a video recording of lessons drawn from a range of specific teaching subjects and then requesting the group to analyse what they see and then discuss issues like What is the teacher doing that is effective?

· Teachers can share and analyse their school policy documents in an attempt to identify where there may be consensus about characteristics of effective teaching. They could be asked to think about questions like (for example) What is important about monitoring pupils work?

· In subsequent sessions, teachers can be asked to identify changes in their practice which have been inspired by input from earlier workshops and support. They can be asked to expand their understanding of good practice by extending their newly acquired understanding to their own subject areas and classroom contexts. Thus, for example, they might be asked How can group discussions be used in the teaching of science?

2.1.1 Participants' responses to the question What do student teachers in Year 1 need when they first go into school?

WHAT?

WHY?

1. professional commitment

knowledge, attitudes, skills depend on this

2. how to know pupils needs

always necessary for teachers (relevance and motivation)

3. subject knowledge

teachers have to know the requirements of the syllabus

4. communication skills

to give guidelines to pupils for presentation, description, summarising

5. how to choose learning and teaching materials suitable for pupils

so they have pupils' attention

5. punctuality

for orga