This snapshot, taken on 05/05/2010, shows web content selected for preservation by The National Archives. External links, forms and search boxes may not work in archived websites.
| Contact us | Help | Site map |

 

Casino Advisory Panel logo


Press Notices

Casino Advisory Panel Publishes List of Proposals

Tuesday, 04 April 2006

The Casino Advisory Panel announced today that 68 Local Authorities had submitted formal proposals to be considered by the Panel for one of the 17 new casino locations (1 regional, 8 large and 8 small):

Regional (27)
Blackpool; Brent; Cardiff; Chesterfield; Coventry; Dartford; Dudley; Glasgow; Great Yarmouth; Greenwich; Havering; Hull; Ipswich; Leeds; Manchester; Middlesbrough; Midlothian; Newcastle; Newport; Sheffield; Solihull; Southampton; Southend-on-Sea; Sunderland; Thurrock; Wakefield; West Dunbartonshire.

Large & Small (41)
Bath & NE Somerset ;Bournemouth; Bradford; Brighton & Hove; Cannock Chase; Canterbury; Carlisle; Chelmsford; Chester; Derby ; Dover; Dumfries & Galloway; East Lindsey; Falkirk; Harrogate; Hastings; Leicester; Luton; Maidstone; Mansfield; Milton Keynes; Newham; NE Lincolnshire; Peterborough; Renfrewshire; Restormel; St Helens; Salford ; Scarborough; Sefton; Sevenoaks; Shepway; South Tyneside; Surrey Heath; Swansea; Swindon; Taunton Deane; Torbay; Westminster, Woking; Wolverhampton. A number of authorities have requested more than one casino and a number of authorities have also indicated that they would be prepared to license a lower category of casino if they don’t secure their first choice. Chairman of the Panel, Professor Stephen Crow, said today, “These proposals represent a lot of hard work by the people that have prepared them, and, very often, a lot of difficult decision making also. They all deserve nothing less than fair and thorough examination. “Over the next few weeks all the proposals – and the evidence supporting them - will be considered very carefully to see how well they measure up. We expect that this process will last at least six to eight weeks and would ask for forbearance during this initial evaluation period. Each proposal must be studied in detail and this will take time. We will not be making any further announcements regarding the proposals during this period. If, however, we find we need additional information during this period, we shall ask for it. I would also like to make clear that written representations from any interested party may be made to the Panel at any time. “Once we have completed this initial phase of evaluation, selected proposals will then go forward for further examination over the summer months.”

back to top

Notes to Editors:

Further examination In addition to the seeking of further information in writing, the Panel will test the strength of selected competing proposals. This may be done either through the medium of public “round table” conferences based on the method of examination-in-public (EiP) or through the examination and consideration of written representations and other material. EiPs are likely to take place from the end of August to the end of September and will be limited to proposals for the regional casino. Proposals for large and small casinos will be examined on the basis of written evidence.

Subject to that, the Secretary of State has also asked the Panel;


back to top

Terms and Conditions | Crown Copyright | Accessibility
Department for Culture, Media and Sport © 2005 - 2007