My thoughts on the BBC's obsession with digital services at the
expense of mainstream TV channels

Dear Sirs,

I understand from the BBC website that you are compiling
input from the public about the BBC's digital services.  I
have a few comments to make:-

*	It is iniquitous to exclude the vast majority of
licence payers by putting new programmes onto a digital
channel first, before they appear on mainstream channels.  
*	It would be much fairer to use digital channels to
repeat output, but under no circumstances is it justified to
put the initial showing onto digital first.
*	Many homes have more than one television, so even if
they have invested in a new digital TV or digibox, it is
unlikely that all their viewing opportunities will enable
them to use digital equipment.  So even, when homes are
counted in the 'able to view digital services' totals, it is
extremely likely that much of their viewing time (in bedroom,
kitchen, playroom, etc) will exclude the digital experience.
Therefore, your assumptions about numbers able to use the new
digital services are flawed and distorted.
*	BBC digital channels should not be offered free of
charge, except to educational establishments.  
*	There should be a pay for viewing digital system in
homes.  At present, all licence payers are subsidising the
very few digital viewers.
*	The BBC should come clean about it's advertising
policy.  The Corporation spends many hours each day, between
every single programme, advertising their own programmes and
services.  This is advertising.  The BBC should charge the
relevant programme providers accordingly.  Especially as many
of these programme providers are independent bodies.  While
charging for these adverts, the BBC could also add in other
adverts and charge for them.  This would be a much more
honest policy.
*	Instead of giving free access to their very good
website, the BBC should also charge for this, by allowing
reputable advertisers to take space.

I hope these comments are included in your review.
Regards 
Brenda Butler