 |
| 
|
| Section Links: |
|
| |
|
What is e-Business? |
|
|
The subjects discussed in this guide, and the terminology used,
often prompt a good deal of confusion. In the field of e-Business,
a number of terms seem to be used interchangeably or with little
thought as to their meaning – e-Commerce, e-Business, e-Procurement
etc.. In a fast changing environment it is not surprising that one
of the fastest areas of growth is in the creation of new “buzz
words”. On the whole it is not necessary to worry unduly about
the different terminology. However, there is one distinction which
is worth making; for the purposes of this guide, we take the phrases
e-Commerce and e-Business to mean:-
|
| |
-
e-Commerce is the electronic conduct of buying and selling
activity and is usually associated with web sites from which
consumers purchase goods or services (known as b2c – business
to consumer), but it is also used in relationships between businesses,
often employing private networks (b2b – business to business).
In the defence sector, the MOD in particular, we are largely
concerned with this latter category of e-Commerce – although
the former may have some relevance, for example when using the
GPC.
|
-
e-Business is a broad term, embracing all of the individual
“e” tools and techniques. It is usually taken to
mean the integration of electronic processes beyond buying and
selling activities, e.g. full integration into organisations’
ERP (Enterprise Resource Planning) systems or equivalent business
tools to conduct transactions by electronic communications end-to-end.
|
| In the defence environment
a number of tools and techniques are available which, collectively,
add up to a full range of e-Business capabilities. Some examples
are shown below:-
|
| e-Mail
e-Procurement
e-Commerce
e-Process
e-Working
Full e-Business! |
| Benefits & Risks
|
[top]
|
e-Business must be about delivering benefits. It is not about applying
electronic techniques just to be fashionable. Many of the benefits
will be articulated in subsequent chapters where individual subjects
are addressed. However, there are some generic benefits to be realised
which fit broadly into the SMART Acquisition philosophy of “Faster,
Better, Cheaper.”
|
-
Faster: The application of e-Business techniques enable the
realisation of business process re-design, using electronic
tools to speed up processes, often by means of automation;
-
Better: Working electronically enables people to be liberated
from routine, non value-adding tasks. It makes the computers
do the drudgery, freeing up the power of human intellect and
creativity. Working electronically also offers improvements
in traceability and audibility;
-
Cheaper: Automation and taking manual intervention out of
the equation can lead to reduced costs.
|
There are also broader,
governmental benefits to adopting e-Business techniques. The Prime
Minister stated that he wished the UK to provide the best environment
in the world for e-Trading . In that context, public sector procurement
organisations can act as an exemplar, using their purchasing power
to encourage the adoption of e-Business techniques, and thereby
assisting the development of the UK marketplace. In order to encourage
Government Departments to engage in this process, the Government
has set down the aim of undertaking all service provision electronically
by 2005. Ultimately, however, decisions on the application of particular
techniques have to be based upon the business value that these techniques
deliver.
|
Working in this new environment
is not without its risks. In the defence sector, in particular,
the UK is working on the boundary of new developments, pushing the
agenda forward. For that reason, we are encountering new issues
well ahead of other areas. Individual chapters of this guide will
address risks as well as benefits in respect of particular subjects.
Nevertheless, there are also some generic risks. Perhaps the biggest
of these is that, unlike most manual business processes, e-Business
is very often supported by one or more third parties, who are not
part of the usual business relationship, for example providers of
exchange services like the Defence Electronic Commerce Service (DECS)
and EXOSTAR. The existence of these third parties has to be recognised
in business relationships and there has to be clarity about which
parties are responsible for particular risks and who bears liability
for them.
|
While there are new risks
to be addressed as a result of implementing e-Business, merely from
the use of electronic transactions, all the normal rules, legal
principles and rules of business in a non-electronic environment
continue to apply.
|
e-Business in Defence
|
[top]
|
The Ministry of Defence
and those of its suppliers who are its major Industrial partners
are committed to employing e-Business techniques in their trading
and collaborative relationships. The Department has published an
e-Business strategy and many of the major defence industries also
have strategic visions of how they are employing or intend to employ
e-Business.
|
Joined-up government
|
[top]
|
The MOD works closely with
other government departments and agencies to ensure that its application
of e-Business takes into account wider government interests. The
Department’s e-Business strategy is approved by the Government’s
e-Envoy, with whom it has a close working relationship. MOD also
works closely with the e-Commerce Team at the Office of Government
Commerce (OGC) and are represented on a number of the OGC’s
“e” committees. The OGC has the policy lead in central
civil government for e-Commerce. Both the e-Envoy and the OGC are
represented on a defence e-Business committee, which reports to
the Commercial Policy Group.
|
MOD and Industry working together
|
[top]
|
There are a number of committees,
organisations and initiatives in the e-Business arena demonstrating
the desire of MOD and its Industrial partners to work together for
mutual benefit. For example, the UK Council for e-Business (UKCeB)
sponsors a number of Working Groups that each look in detail at
specific aspects of e-Business, such as Information Management and
the Export Control of Intangibles. In the context of commercial
issues, a working group has been formed under the auspices of the
Commercial Policy Group. The e-Business working group is jointly
chaired by representatives of the MOD and Defence Industry and is
composed of stakeholders from Defence Industry, e-Business service
providers as well as MOD itself and other central government organisations,
such as the e-Envoy and the OGC. The purpose of the working group
is to drive forward the development of commercial policy on the
application of e-Business, ensuring that the commercial approach
takes account of risks and liabilities and allocates these appropriately.
It is also a forum for new ideas and an opportunity for Industry
representatives to influence MOD thinking and keep up to date with
new developments. Organisations represented on the working group
are as follows:-
|
| Defence Logistics Organisation |
Confederation of British Industry |
Ultra SBS |
| Defence Procurement Agency |
Office of Government Commerce |
Smiths Group |
| Director General Information |
United Kingdom Council for e-Business |
BAE SYSTEMS |
| Defence Estates |
Society for British Aerospace |
Sun Microsystems |
| Legal Advisor |
Lockheed Martin |
British Telecom |
| Aerosystems |
International Rolls Royce |
Xcel UK |
| TRW Systems |
Mass Consultants |
Thales Optronics |
| Chemring Countermeasures |
Cap Gemini Ernst & Young |
|
| Enterprise Integration Programme Coherence
Team |
General Dynamics |
|
|
|
Key to the commercial implementation
of e-Business is the development of a portfolio of standard contract
conditions that facilitate the agreement of contracts that enable
MOD and Industry to take advantage of e-Business techniques. e-Business
is a challenging subject, and the more we can work from a standard
tool-set of conditions, with obligations, risks and liabilities
already scoped, at least at an outline level, the quicker we can
get to contract. Of course, being realistic, this is an area of
business where things can move very quickly, so we will never have
all of the commercial issues completely worked out.
|
This Guide
|
[top]
|
Within the chapters of
this guide, we hope to explain the various applications and techniques
that are in use or could be used in commercial relationships between
the MOD and its Industrial partners. Each chapter tries, in so far
as is possible, to outline these in straightforward language, to
explain the commercial significance, and to provide pointers to
further information and contact points. Due to the dynamic nature
of the subject, and the fact that the guide references other, sometimes
more detailed documents, this cannot be regarded as a fully comprehensive
guide to Defence e-Business. However, we believe that it does represent
the first overview of the subject from a commercial perspective.
|
Acknowledgements
|
[top]
|
This guide could not have
been produced without the following, who have contributed sections,
ideas or commented upon the drafting: Jean Keay, Gwen Beale, Colin
Sinkins, Denise Savage, Mary Shoobridge, Jack Danpure, Robert Miller,
Jim Ayres, Julian Campbell, Anne MacFarlane, Ian Rooney, Jerry Fathers,
Rick Evans, Alan Brown, Brian Duffy, Peter Farmer, Andy Carpenter,
Paul Newman, Tim Lam, Simon Dunford, Graham Sturgess, Patrick Curry.
I owe a particular debt to Grant Lovett, for providing valuable
and extensive support in the editing process. Grateful thanks are
also due to David Scillitoe, my co-Chair on the Commercial Policy
e-Business Working Group, and to other members of the Working Group.
Any errors or omissions are, of course, entirely the responsibility
of the editor. |
By Simon Lydiard
MOD Commercial Policy Adviser on e-Business & Guide Editor
|
|
 |