Pacificorp and The Energy Group Plc: A Report on the
proposed acquisition
Summary of report (html format)
Full text (pdf format)
Adobe Acrobat Reader can be downloaded from http://www.adobe.com
Summary
On 1 August 1997 the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry (the
Secretary of State) asked us (see Appendix 1.1) to investigate and report
on the proposed acquisition by PacifiCorp of The Energy Group plc (TEG).
We were also asked to examine whether there was already in existence a
merger between PacifiCorp and TEG: but we found this not to be the case.
The PacifiCorp group is an electricity utility which operates primarily
in the western USA and in Victoria, Australia. TEG is the parent company
of Eastern Group plc (Eastern Group), whose subsidiary Eastern Electricity
plc (Eastern Electricity) distributes electricity in the east of England,
supplies electricity in that area and elsewhere in the UK and is the fourth
largest generator of electricity in the UK. PacifiCorp currently has no
activities in the UK and the merger does not have any direct effect on
competition in the UK.
Eastern would be the eighth regional electricity company (REC) to be
owned by a US parent company, but we saw no reason to expect adverse effects
to result from foreign owner-ship in itself. Concern was expressed to
us about the effect of the merger on the availability of information necessary
for the effective regulation of the licensed activities of Eastern Electricity,
but we found the existing provisions of Eastern Electricity's licence
sufficient to ensure availability of adequate information to the Director
General of Electricity Supply (DGES). There was also concern about the
extent to which information about Eastern Electricity would be publicly
available: but we concluded that such problems did not arise from the
merger and could be appropriately addressed elsewhere, for example in
the interdepart-mental review of utility regulation currently being carried
out.
Our main area of concern was the effect of the intended financial arrangements
for the acquisition, which would be financed to a large extent by borrowing.
The higher the level of gearing (the ratio of debt to debt plus equity),
the greater the likelihood of financial pressures on a firm in servicing
debt in the event of adverse economic conditions. The gearing of Eastern
Electricity itself would not be increased by the merger, but Eastern Group's
new holding company?PacifiCorp Acquisitions?would initially be almost
entirely debt financed, and would rely heavily on the dividends paid to
it from Eastern Group to service that debt. Although we do not expect
financial difficulties to arise, we believe that, in the absence of adequate
controls, the high level of gearing resulting from the merger would give
rise to a significant risk of finan-cial pressure on the holding companies
of Eastern Electricity, potentially leading to a require-ment for higher
cash flows from Eastern Electricity than would otherwise be the case,
and to under-investment, poorer service standards and/or higher prices
for electricity in the longer term as a consequence.
However, Eastern Electricity's existing licence conditions include a
number of provi-sions designed to `ring-fence' its licensed activities
from those of the group of which it is a member, and to ensure that it
has adequate financial resources to undertake these activities. In our
view, the existing controls, which include the provisions of the Electricity
Act 1989 (Electricity Act) subsuming the enforcement powers of the DGES,
and Eastern Electricity's licence, together with licence amendments previously
agreed in principle between PacifiCorp and the DGES, are sufficient to
address the risk that Eastern Electricity would be adversely affected
by any such financial pressures. The DGES should therefore be in a position
to ensure that investment and service standards can be maintained, without
higher prices resulting from the merger.
We have therefore concluded that the proposed merger may not be expected
to operate against the public interest.
Full text
Contents
|
Part I
|
Summary and Conclusions
|
| Chapter 1 |
Summary |
| Chapter 2 |
Conclusions |
Part II
|
Background and evidence
|
| Chapter 3 |
The companies and the merger situation |
| Chapter 4 |
The electricity markets in England and Wales and the
regulation of Eastern Electricity |
| Chapter 5 |
Investment, quality of supply and customer service |
| Chapter 6 |
Views of the DGES and the DTI |
| Chapter 7 |
Views of other third parties |
| Chapter 8 |
Views of PacifiCorp and TEG |
| |
List of signatories |
Appendices
|
|
| (The numbering of the appendices indicates
the chapters to which they relate) |
| 1.1 |
The reference and background |
| 2.1 |
Detailed conditions of the licence |
| 3.1 |
PacifiCorp: consolidated balance sheets, 1992 to 1996 |
| 3.2 |
PacifiCorp: sources and applications of funds, 1992 to
1996 |
| 3.3 |
TEG: corporate structure |
| 3.4 |
Eastern Group: corporate structure |
| 3.5 |
TEG: balance sheets, 1995 to 1997 |
| 3.6 |
TEG: summary of sources and applications of funds, 1
October 1996 to 31 March 1997 |
| 3.7 |
Eastern Group: consolidated balance sheets, 1993 to 1997 |
| 3.8 |
Eastern Group: summary of sources and applications of
funds, 1993 to 1997 |
| 3.9 |
PacifiCorp Acquisitions: financial projections, sensitivity
analysis (US GAAP) |
| 3.10 |
Eastern Group: financial projections, sensitivity analysis
(US GAAP) |
| 4.1 |
PES licence for Eastern Electricity: current and proposed
conditions on ring-fencing, resources, disposal of assets
and information |
| 8.1 |
Extract from a letter of 24 October 1997 from Messrs
Stoel Rives, Attorneys to PacifiCorp |
| Glossary |
|
Back to the top
|