|
home | strategy development | strategy
skills | site
index | access
keys
Analysing data - Organisational analysis
>
in practice
> template
Organisational analysis aims to generate an
understanding of the organisational structure and culture of the system
the project is looking at. This can help in understanding the ease or
difficulty with which new strategies can be adopted.
Resource Analysis
A resource audit should be carried out to identify the
quantity and quality of resources available to the organisations that will
be involved with the implementation of the new strategy. The key areas to
assess include:
- Availability of and sources of finance
- Skills: organisational, leadership, technical expertise
- Availability of physical resources e.g. buildings offices etc
- IT capacity
- HR capacity.
There are also some intangible organisational assets
which should be assessed such as:
- goodwill
- branding
- contacts
- image etc.
The audit should be comprehensive, but should
concentrate on identifying resources that are critical to the
organisation's capabilities.
It can also be helpful to conduct historical analysis,
looking at the deployment of resources of the organisation by comparison
with previous years. This can help identify any significant changes and
reveal trends which might not otherwise be apparent. Benchmarking
to other similar organisations both in the UK and other countries
can also help put the organisation into perspective.
Finally, it may be beneficial to undertake analysis as
to the extent to which the organisation's resources are balanced as a
whole. The three key aspects of resource balance analysis are:
- the extent to which various activities and resources of the
organisation complement each other
- the degree of balance of the people within the organisation in terms
of individual skills and personality types
- whether the degree of flexibility in the organisation's resources is
appropriate for the level of uncertainty in the environment and the
degree of risk the organisation is likely to take.
Cultural Mapping
The aim of cultural mapping is to understand how an
organisation's culture will affect its ability to change and adapt to
new policies or environments.
Faced with similar environments organisations respond
differently. The collective behaviour of managers and employees is
determined by frames of reference (the paradigm) which are created by the
culture of the organisation (deeper level of basic assumptions and
beliefs). The purpose of a cultural audit is to:
- understand that culture;
- understand how the culture contributes to the problem; and
- work out how it needs to change in order for the organisation to
deliver the strategy effectively.
The cultural audit analyses different aspects of the organisation's
cultural web:
See this culture
web template (pdf)
A cultural audit can be conducted through:
- Listening to people talk about their organisation
- Observing the organisation day to day operation
- Asking managers to undertake the audit themselves using a checklist
In addition, to identify the dominant culture of the
organisation as a whole it is helpful to analyse the way its strategies
have developed historically.
Checklist
Stories
- What core beliefs do stories reflect?
- How pervasive are these beliefs?
- Do stories relate to strengths or weaknesses, success or failures,
conformity or mavericks
- Who are the heroes and villains?
- What norms do the mavericks deviate from?
Routines and rituals
- Which routines are emphasised?
- Which would look odd if changed?
- What behaviour do routines encourage?
- What are the key rituals?
- What core beliefs do they reflect?
- What do training programmes emphasise?
- How easy are rituals/routines to change?
Symbols
- What language and jargon is used?
- How internal or accessible is it?
- What aspects of strategy are highlighted in publicity?
- What status symbols are there?
- Are there particular symbols which denote the organisation?
Organisational structure
- How mechanistic/organic are the structures?
- How flat/hierarchical are the structures?
- How formal/informal are the structures?
- Do structures encourage collaboration or competition?
- What type of power structures do they support?
Control Systems
- What is most closely monitored/controlled?
- Is emphasis on reward or punishment?
- Are controls related to history or current strategies?
- Are there many/few controls?
Power Structures
- What are the core beliefs of the leadership?
- How strongly held are these beliefs?
- How is power distributed in the organisation ?
- Where are the main blockages to change?
Overall
- What is the dominant culture?
- How easy is this to change?
- Are there any linking threads through the separate elements of the
web?
(Source: Exploring Corporate Strategy - Gerry Johnson,
Kevan Scholes)
Strengths
- Organisational analysis allows you to understand the ease or
difficulty with which new strategies can be adopted.
- Will help identify whether the organisation has the
resources/competencies to deliver the new strategic direction, once
identified.
- Will identify key areas of relevant expertise/knowledge within the
organisation. Policies can then be developed to capitalise on this
expertise.
- Feeds into change
management and implementation
planning
- Comprehensive assessment of organisational culture.
Weaknesses
- Time consuming and often neglected during the knowledge gathering
phase.
- Assessment may not be objective if conducted by the managers of the
organisation
References
Related Sections: comparison with other organisations -
see Benchmarking
Exploring Corporate Strategy, Gerry Johnson & Kevan
Scholes, Prentice Hall, 1993.
Analysing data - Organisational analysis
In Practice: A Local Authority
A workshop was held for three departments of a local
authority to explore the cultural barriers to introducing a new strategy
that was focused on the needs of local users. Each department was
represented by 4-5 managers. The managers were divided into groups and
given a blank cultural web diagram and asked to fill it in. The cultural
web produced by those from the Technical Services Departments, showed
that:
- There was a strong commitment to producing a high quality service
but that this was due to a focus on professional standards rather than
satisfy users of the service.
- Departments tended to be silos headed by chief officers who worked
closely with the elected members of the local government.
- There was a hierarchical and mechanistic approach to management with
a strong emphasis on structuring and budgeting
- The service was reactive rather than proactive
- There was a blame culture. If something went wrong blame someone
else.

The workshop concluded that the "culture was
managing the strategy". It was therefore very difficult to develop a
strategy that focused on local issues that crossed departments. The Group
then identified barriers to change, these included: firefighting,
departmental barons, the formality of management, stories of the good old
days and the blame culture. The group then re-mapped the cultural web with
behaviours that would be needed to support a new strategy. The team then
compared the two cultural webs, identified the changes that would be
required, assessed how difficult it would be to manage those changes and
identified those changes that would have a high impact.
|
^ top
|