Better Regulation Executive

Related Links

• Government News Network

Feedback

• Website feedback
• Email updates
• Send to a friend

Penalties Review - rogue businesses should redress the harm they cause

A review of the penalties for regulatory non-compliance lead by Professor Richard Macrory published its final report today. The report 'Regulatory Justice: Making Sanctions Effective' found that reliance on criminal prosecution failed to give regulators adequate means to effectively deal with many cases in a proportionate and risk based way.

It also found that the use of criminal prosecutions can be a disproportionate response in many instances of regulatory non compliance and that penalties handed down by the courts often failed to act as a sufficient deterrent or reflect the economic benefit gained.

Professor Richard Macrory said:

'A flexible and transparent set of regulatory sanctions will reduce the burden on legitimate business by dealing effectively with the rogues and reducing the need for inspection. Criminal prosecution has an important role to play but regulators need the flexibility to deal with individual cases appropriately. In some cases rogues find it cheaper to ignore regulations and take the penalty than comply, these proposals will end this situation.'

The review proposes a broad 'toolkit' of administrative penalties for regulators to promote and enforce regulatory compliance. It recommends that the Government pilot schemes involving restorative justice whereby those most effected by a regulatory wrongdoing can come together to address the harm and prevent a recurrence.

The report also recommends the extension of flexible administrative monetary sanctions and the strengthening of statutory notices to work alongside the criminal law in combating non-compliance.

Regulators will only get access to the new toolkit when they have demonstrated to the Panel on Regulatory Accountability that they are compliant with the Hampton and Macrory principles.

The Government accepts all the recommendations of the Macrory Review of Penalties. Government will carefully consider the implications of the Macrory recommendations for a tribunal to hear appeals against sanctions for regulatory non compliance particularly any funding implications and how they might best be addressed in taking forward the review's recommendations.

Notes to Editors

1. Copies to the report can be obtained from the Macrory Review pages
2. Richard Macrory is a Barrister and Professor of Environmental Law at University Collage London. In September 2005 he was asked by the Government to lead this comprehensive review of regulatory sanctions.
3. The review was commissioned on the recommendation of the Hampton review on regulatory inspections and enforcement published in the Budget 2005. The Hampton principles of risk based enforcement are set out in Philip Hampton's report Reducing administrative burdens: effective inspection and enforcement
4. The Better Regulation Task Force five principles of good regulation can be viewed on the BRC website.

Cabinet Office Press Office, Press Officer: Stephen Coomber

Tel: 020 7276 0317
Fax: 020 7276 0618

www.cabinetoffice.gov.uk