Cabinet Office News Release (CAB/008-06)
A review set up to look at how the UK puts EU legislation into practice is calling for evidence of over-implementation.
The review is calling for business and other sectors to come forward with instances where 'goldplating' - adding unnecessary burdens as EU measures enter UK law - may be creating excessive red tape in the UK .
Neil Davidson QC, the former Solicitor General for Scotland , was appointed by the Chancellor in November 2005 to lead an independent review to look not only at 'goldplating', but at the broader issue of over-implementation.
Supported by the Cabinet Office, the review aims to identify - and consider ways to simplify - any unnecessary burdens created by over-implementation, and will report with recommendations to Government by the end of 2006.
The review is looking at the whole process by which EU legislation is given effect in the UK , from transposition (writing EU legislation into national law) to enforcement. It adopts a broad definition of over-implementation and welcomes examples of:
Neil Davidson QC, said:
'Around half of all new legislation that impacts on business derives from rules agreed by governments at the EU level - so it is important that the Government and society are confident that EU rules are written into the UK statute book as simply and effectively as possible.
'Today I am publishing a call to evidence to give everyone the chance to put forward examples of EU implementation they think ought to be independently scrutinised and perhaps revisited by the Government.
'The purpose of my Review is not to catalogue whether various sectors of society like or dislike certain rules agreed by governments at the EU level. The Review will focus on areas of over-implementation - where the UK has regulations that are stricter or more burdensome than required by EU law - and consider whether these could be simplified.'
Welcoming the review, Cabinet Office Minister Jim Murphy said:
'This Government is committed an ambitious regulatory reform agenda in the UK and the EU, and as a part of that Neil Davidson will carry out important work to analyse how EU legislation is implemented in the UK.
'We have strengthened scrutiny of EU regulations, publishing best-practice guidance for policy-makers in the 2005 budget. This review will ensure that the principles we set out are applied to the stock of laws originating from Europe that may not have been transposed in the least burdensome way possible.'
What the Review is looking for:
The Review will evaluate a sample of EU-derived legislation for evidence of 'over-implementation', including smarter implementation by other Member States. It will complement the work of government departments to reduce their regulatory burdens by helping them to identify further proposals to include in upcoming simplification plans.
The review team is also interested in hearing about areas where EU-derived regulation is enforced more strictly in the UK by comparison to other parts of the EU; and examples where the higher regulatory standards resulting from over-implementation justify the extra costs.
To download the pdf document which sets out the examples we are interested in hearing about, alongside further details about the scope and timing of the review, please go to : www.cabinetoffice.gov.uk/regulation/davidson_review.
The call for evidence will last for 12 weeks. If you have evidence relevant to the review, please email or post any views or evidence to BRE-Davidson.Review@cabinet-office.x.gsi.gov.uk by 25th May 2006.
The contact details for the review team are:
Davidson Review of Implementation of EU Legislation
Cabinet Office, 22 Whitehall
London , SW1A 2WH
Tel: 020 7276 1751
Cabinet Office Press Office 70 Whitehall , London SW1A 2AS
Press Officer: Campbell McDonald
Tel: 020 7276 0311 - Fax: 020 7276 0618