This snapshot, taken on 11/03/2005, shows web content selected for preservation by The National Archives. External links, forms and search boxes may not work in archived websites.
Cabinet Office   Cabinet Office  
Regulatory Impact Unit
Code of Practice on Consultation - Guidance
 
Home

ACCESSIBILITY

Writing an accessible consultation document

It is best practice to use your department’s template or the Cabinet Office template when writing a consultation document.

You should check with your departmental consultation co-ordinator whether your department has a particular house style.

A clearly written and legible consultation document benefits everyone. In particular, people who have very little time to read the document, people with visual impairments, people with a learning disability or literacy difficulty or those whose first language isn’t English. Moreover if the text is easy to read, you will hold your readers’ concentration for longer.

A persistent criticism of government departments is that they appear too detached. In consultation documents it is important to adopt a user-friendly and accessible tone of voice. This refers to the language, vocabulary, structure, syntax and viewpoint of the writer. For guidance on writing in plain English go to: www.plainenglish.co.uk

When writing a consultation document, remember to:

  • be concise; people are deterred by long documents
  • use short sentences with the minimum punctuation necessary
  • write in language which will be understood by the intended audience, avoiding overly technical language for a general audience
  • avoid jargon
  • only abbreviate words in tables; otherwise spell out in full. However note that some organisations are only known by an abbreviation, for example IBM, BT
  • avoid acronyms, where they are unavoidable, include a glossary of terms
  • number paragraphs so that the respondent can refer to specific paragraphs in their reply
  • avoid brackets for qualifying text within sentences; use a new sentence instead
  • provide a brief outline of the background to the policy in the consultation and give web references where more detail can be found

It is important to avoid language that confirms stereotypes. Many organisations provide guidance on acceptable terminology to use to describe people:

Legible print increases access to documents for people with a visual impairment. It includes type face size, the arrangement of text on the page, minimal underling and colour contrast. However this will not make your document accessible to all people with visual impairments. For guidance on writing for people with a visual impairment refer to the See it Right pack at: www.rnib.org.uk

The document should be available in different formats on request.

When you put your consultation document on the web ensure that you make it available in different document formats. Remember that respondents may not have the latest equipment. Consider your use of large colourful diagrams which may take a long time to download or may not be clear if printed in black and white. Consider putting the executive summary separately for espondents to download first, to decide whether they need to download the larger document.

The main alternative formats for documents are: Braille, floppy disks, audio tapes and large print. The internet is increasingly useful as a format for deaf people and blind and partially sighted people. Of particular relevance are text to speech readers, screen magnification and flexibility to print. Other formats that could be considered include signed and subtitled videos, radio, and advertisements.

If a leaflet summarising the consultation document is being published, it should be available from the outset in a range of formats – one format is unlikely to suit everyone.

The Disability Discrimination Act 1995 requires government departments, as service providers, to take reasonable steps to ensure that all printed material and marketing material are accessible for disabled people.

Pilot written consultation documents

Before publishing a consultation document it is worth finding out:

  • if the draft is clearly written
  • if the key proposals are transparent and can be found quickly
  • whether the questions are clear and come across as intended
  • if the document complies fully with the code of practice on consultation

Test a draft consultation document:

  • with colleagues who are not familiar with the policy area
  • with potential responders to the document. A draft could be shown to members of an advisory panel or people who attended an earlier discussion forum
  • with equality groups for advice of the use of language, the presentation of the document, whether further questions on diversity could be included and if the proposed means for responding are appropriate
  • with your departmental consultation co-ordinator