| I am delighted to be speaking here today – especially
since I’ve been a supporter of Fathers Direct since it began. .
Ten years ago, I gave what I think was the first public lecture on
fatherhood in Britain. In those days, fathers were almost entirely absent
from the debate about families – except in their role as absent fathers
who had to be chased for money by the Child Support Agency.
Today, we have woken up to the fact that children do best when they
have the love and practical support of both their parents, whether or not
their parents are living together. The attendance here today – nearly 1000
delegates – reflects the fact that a modern family policy has to include
policies for fathers as well as mothers.
Last Friday, in my constituency surgery, I saw a young woman who’s
expecting her first baby in August. She told me her employer was giving
her six months’ off, paid, and another six months unpaid – and that she’d
be going back to work part-time. (I couldn’t resist telling her that last
year we’d changed the law to give her those rights – and I was thrilled to
get a hug from her in return.)
The personal is political.
Talking to my constituent reminded me of that old feminist slogan –
which I see was the title for the first session of your conference this
morning.
But there’s a paradox here.
After all, what could be more intimate than finding a partner and
starting a family? What could be more personal than working out how you’re
going to manage, looking after children, earning a living, even finding a
bit of time for yourself?
No wonder each family feels they’re having to find their own solutions
– personal answers to personal problems.
But the personal choices that we each make – including the decision
whether and when to become a parent - depend so much upon what society
makes possible – or impossible.
It’s much harder in a country like the United States – where maternity
leave only arrived with the Clinton Administration, and even then it’s
only 12 weeks and all unpaid.
It’s much easier in the Scandinavian countries with childcare as much
part of the social fabric as our National Health service, and paid time
off for fathers as well as mothers.
And it’s not surprising that Sweden is one of the few European
countries where birth rates are rising.
So parenthood is an entirely personal choice – but it’s also a
political challenge.
Politicians don’t always find it easy to talk about families.
Traditional Tories think women should stick with traditional roles –
and stay home when children are young.
And in our desire to help lone parent families out of poverty, and make
sure women get a fair deal in the workplace, we’ve sometimes given the
impression that the sooner a mother goes back to work, the better.
So let me spell out what I believe to be the foundation of a modern
family policy.
It is not government’s job to tell parents how to lead their lives.
Parents know for themselves what’s best for them and their children.
It is government’s job to help. Not to impose one-size-fits-all
policies, but to give parents more choice by giving them more support. Not
dictating government, but enabling government.
Ask mothers how they want to look after their young children – and most
say they want to do it themselves, or share it with their partner, or get
some help from a grandparent. Today’s fathers are doing far more childcare
– and all the evidence is that they’d like to do more still.
Those parents need government’s help – so they can reduce their hours
of work, or take a break. Mothers need to know that, if they do take time
off, they won’t be condemned to a less-skilled job, lower pay and a lower
pension for the rest of their lives. Fathers need to know that they won’t
be written off or laughed at if they say they want to share the care of
their children.
Other families need childminders and day-care, particularly as the
children get older.
They need government’s help too – to make sure there’s enough good
quality childcare that parents can afford.
Some want a bit of both.
And we’ve started to deliver both.
In our first term, we began investing in childcare.
Since 1997, more than 920,000 new childcare places have been created,
benefiting over 1.6 m children
524 Sure Start local programmes are now up and running
We have reformed the ways in which the tax and benefit system supports
families with children and those on low incomes.
So that by 2004-05 financial support for children through tax credits,
Child Benefit, and other benefits will have increased by £10.4 billion in
real terms from its 1997 level. A rise of 72 per cent.
In our second term, we introduced the biggest ever package of legal
changes to help parents balance work and family.
And today, we can celebrate the first anniversary of
paid paternity leave
the biggest increase to statutory maternity pay since it was introduced in
1948 and it increased again yesterday.
maternity leave doubled to a year
the right to request flexible working - for fathers, as well as mothers
Many of you helped us put those changes in place, including Fathers
Direct.
We brought large and small businesses, trade unions, the Equal
Opportunities Commission, family groups together to work out a package
that they could all support.
And even then, we had the prophets of doom.
I’ve just re-read the press release from Ruth Lea when she was at the
Institute of Directors. ‘Black Sunday’ she called it a year ago.
Businesses would be threatened. Employers wouldn’t touch women of
childbearing age.
The fact is we’ve got more people in work than ever before – 28.3
million. And more women than ever before are in work (13 million).
And today I can report the results of the first twelve months of our
new laws – and, in particular, the new legal standards on family-friendly
working.
In the last year, nearly a million parents have asked for a change in
their working hours. That’s a quarter of all parents with children under
6.
Eight out of ten of those requests have been granted - by employers
large and small. And another one out of ten were partly accepted, or a
compromise reached.
We’ve cut by half the proportion of cases where the employer has simply
refused to consider a request for flexible working.
Nine out of ten employers say they have no significant problems with
the new right.
And seven out of ten said they would consider flexible working requests
from all staff.
So with today’s survey showing 900,000 new requests this year - and
with almost 800,000 of those accepted - this is a real success story.
Indeed, as more parents gain the confidence to use these new laws, and
even more employers see the benefits to themselves as well as their
employees, I believe that our working time reforms will stand alongside
the national minimum wage in the help they give to Britain’s families.
Where do we go next?
So can we stop there?
Of course not.
Too many parents are still struggling to balance work and family.
I have no doubt that, if we are re-elected, support for families and
support for children, will be at the heart of our third term.
They are certainly at the heart of our programme for transforming
public services. We want public services that are universal – but also
personal. Available to all, but tailored to the needs of each.
That’s what we’re starting to create in the National Health Service.
It’s the vision for our schools and for lifelong learning. And it has to
be the same for families. Not one-size-fits-all, but services and laws
that support parents’ choice.
I have no doubt, too, that, for many people, the most important issue
at the next general election will be which political party really
understands them and their families and can offer them the support they
need. It’s a vote-changing issue : the personal is political indeed.
So today, as I report on what we have already achieved in our second
term, I am also launching a debate about how we should approach our third
term.
This is not some headlong rush into further legislation. I made a
commitment that we will not make any changes to the 2003 employment laws
for three years – and we will stick to that.
But I want to start the conversation now. We need a national debate -
to hear what parents and employers are saying – and to build up our
evidence base.
All of us here have our own ideas about priorities. We’d all like to
wave a magic wand and have change happen overnight.
But we also know that we can’t do everything. And we certainly can’t do
everything at once. Legislation is not the only way to achieve change. We
can reinforce culture change by spreading best practice, supporting trade
unions, encouraging role models and giving a lead in the public sector, as
well as through legislation.
We’re going to have to face up to some tough choices. Let me mention a
few of them that we’re discussing through the Labour Party’s Big
Conversation.
We need to consider, for instance, how much we put taxpayers’ money
into extending and subsidising childcare – and how much we put it into
supporting parents at home, for instance by extending maternity pay to the
second six months.
We need to consider how we support fathers who want to spend more time
with their children. After all, only 1 in 10 fathers are asking for
flexible working – compared with nearly four times as many mothers. So
should we allow parents to divide the second six months’ of maternity
leave between them? Or should we follow the Scandinavian example and
create a ‘daddy month’ that only the father can take?
We also need to consider whether we go on giving priority to families
with young children – or whether it’s time to extend what we’ve done for
them to carers who are looking after elderly or disabled relatives.
And we need more men giving a lead. Isn’t it time we started asking men
in senior positions, and not just women, how they combine a career with
their family? Alan Milburn stepped out of the Cabinet to spend more time
with his young family. Gordon Brown took paternity leave. We need more men
at the top of business to do the same.
Through my department, we’re organising a series of round-tables around
the country – just as we did before 2001.
And I welcome very much the contribution that Fathers Direct is making
through the Charter for Father-Friendly Britain that you launched today.
So with today’s survey showing 900,000 new requests to work flexibly,
this year this is a real success story.
Our partnership is working. With this success behind us, we can go on
to achieve much more in making Britain better – for women, for men and
above all, for our children.
|